1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
|
From 1e3f407f3cacc5dcfe27166c412ed9bc263d82bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:11:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] net: dsa: first set up shared ports, then non-shared
ports
After commit a57d8c217aad ("net: dsa: flush switchdev workqueue before
tearing down CPU/DSA ports"), the port setup and teardown procedure
became asymmetric.
The fact of the matter is that user ports need the shared ports to be up
before they can be used for CPU-initiated termination. And since we
register net devices for the user ports, those won't be functional until
we also call the setup for the shared (CPU, DSA) ports. But we may do
that later, depending on the port numbering scheme of the hardware we
are dealing with.
It just makes sense that all shared ports are brought up before any user
port is. I can't pinpoint any issue due to the current behavior, but
let's change it nonetheless, for consistency's sake.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -999,23 +999,28 @@ static void dsa_tree_teardown_switches(s
dsa_switch_teardown(dp->ds);
}
-static int dsa_tree_setup_switches(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
+/* Bring shared ports up first, then non-shared ports */
+static int dsa_tree_setup_ports(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
- int err;
+ int err = 0;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
- err = dsa_switch_setup(dp->ds);
- if (err)
- goto teardown;
+ if (dsa_port_is_dsa(dp) || dsa_port_is_cpu(dp)) {
+ err = dsa_port_setup(dp);
+ if (err)
+ goto teardown;
+ }
}
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
- err = dsa_port_setup(dp);
- if (err) {
- err = dsa_port_reinit_as_unused(dp);
- if (err)
- goto teardown;
+ if (dsa_port_is_user(dp) || dsa_port_is_unused(dp)) {
+ err = dsa_port_setup(dp);
+ if (err) {
+ err = dsa_port_reinit_as_unused(dp);
+ if (err)
+ goto teardown;
+ }
}
}
@@ -1024,7 +1029,21 @@ static int dsa_tree_setup_switches(struc
teardown:
dsa_tree_teardown_ports(dst);
- dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int dsa_tree_setup_switches(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
+{
+ struct dsa_port *dp;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
+ err = dsa_switch_setup(dp->ds);
+ if (err) {
+ dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
return err;
}
@@ -1111,10 +1130,14 @@ static int dsa_tree_setup(struct dsa_swi
if (err)
goto teardown_cpu_ports;
- err = dsa_tree_setup_master(dst);
+ err = dsa_tree_setup_ports(dst);
if (err)
goto teardown_switches;
+ err = dsa_tree_setup_master(dst);
+ if (err)
+ goto teardown_ports;
+
err = dsa_tree_setup_lags(dst);
if (err)
goto teardown_master;
@@ -1127,8 +1150,9 @@ static int dsa_tree_setup(struct dsa_swi
teardown_master:
dsa_tree_teardown_master(dst);
-teardown_switches:
+teardown_ports:
dsa_tree_teardown_ports(dst);
+teardown_switches:
dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
teardown_cpu_ports:
dsa_tree_teardown_cpu_ports(dst);
|
