aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/ramips/dts/rt5350_nexx_wt1520-4m.dts
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* ramips: move dts-v1 statement to top-level DTSI filesAdrian Schmutzler2020-09-251-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "/dts-v1/;" identifier is supposed to be present once at the top of a device tree file after the includes have been processed. In ramips, we therefore requested to have in the DTS files so far, and omit it in the DTSI files. However, essentially the syntax of the parent mtxxxx/rtxxxx DTSI files already determines the DTS version, so putting it into the DTS files is just a useless repetition. Consequently, this patch puts the dts-v1 statement into the top-level SoC-based DTSI files, and removes all other occurences. Since the dts-v1 statement needs to be before any other definitions, this also moves the includes accordingly where necessary. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
* ramips: dts: use generic node name for flashSungbo Eo2020-05-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In DTS Checklist[1] we're now demanding proper generic node names, as the name of a node should reflect the function of the device and use generic name for that[2]. Everybody seems to be copy&pasting from DTS files available in the repository today, so let's unify that naming there as well and provide proper examples. While at it, remove unused m25p80 label. Tested on rt5350 (for spi-nor) and rt3662 (for cfi-flash). 1. https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches#dts_checklist 2. https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/master/source/devicetree-basics.rst#generic-names-recommendation Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run>
* ramips/rt305x: Name DTS files based on schemeAdrian Schmutzler2019-07-101-0/+48
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>