diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/generic/pending-3.18/080-06-fib_trie-Optimize-fib_table_lookup-to-avoid-wasting-.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/generic/pending-3.18/080-06-fib_trie-Optimize-fib_table_lookup-to-avoid-wasting-.patch | 343 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 343 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/pending-3.18/080-06-fib_trie-Optimize-fib_table_lookup-to-avoid-wasting-.patch b/target/linux/generic/pending-3.18/080-06-fib_trie-Optimize-fib_table_lookup-to-avoid-wasting-.patch deleted file mode 100644 index e84412687d..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/generic/pending-3.18/080-06-fib_trie-Optimize-fib_table_lookup-to-avoid-wasting-.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,343 +0,0 @@ -From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> -Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:55:54 -0800 -Subject: [PATCH] fib_trie: Optimize fib_table_lookup to avoid wasting - time on loops/variables - -This patch is meant to reduce the complexity of fib_table_lookup by reducing -the number of variables to the bare minimum while still keeping the same if -not improved functionality versus the original. - -Most of this change was started off by the desire to rid the function of -chopped_off and current_prefix_length as they actually added very little to -the function since they only applied when computing the cindex. I was able -to replace them mostly with just a check for the prefix match. As long as -the prefix between the key and the node being tested was the same we know -we can search the tnode fully versus just testing cindex 0. - -The second portion of the change ended up being a massive reordering. -Originally the calls to check_leaf were up near the start of the loop, and -the backtracing and descending into lower levels of tnodes was later. This -didn't make much sense as the structure of the tree means the leaves are -always the last thing to be tested. As such I reordered things so that we -instead have a loop that will delve into the tree and only exit when we -have either found a leaf or we have exhausted the tree. The advantage of -rearranging things like this is that we can fully inline check_leaf since -there is now only one reference to it in the function. - -Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> -Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> ---- - ---- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c -+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c -@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ typedef unsigned int t_key; - #define IS_TNODE(n) ((n)->bits) - #define IS_LEAF(n) (!(n)->bits) - -+#define get_shift(_kv) (KEYLENGTH - (_kv)->pos - (_kv)->bits) -+#define get_index(_key, _kv) (((_key) ^ (_kv)->key) >> get_shift(_kv)) -+ - struct tnode { - t_key key; - unsigned char bits; /* 2log(KEYLENGTH) bits needed */ -@@ -1281,7 +1284,7 @@ static int check_leaf(struct fib_table * - continue; - fib_alias_accessed(fa); - err = fib_props[fa->fa_type].error; -- if (err) { -+ if (unlikely(err < 0)) { - #ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS - this_cpu_inc(t->stats->semantic_match_passed); - #endif -@@ -1303,7 +1306,7 @@ static int check_leaf(struct fib_table * - res->prefixlen = li->plen; - res->nh_sel = nhsel; - res->type = fa->fa_type; -- res->scope = fa->fa_info->fib_scope; -+ res->scope = fi->fib_scope; - res->fi = fi; - res->table = tb; - res->fa_head = &li->falh; -@@ -1321,23 +1324,24 @@ static int check_leaf(struct fib_table * - return 1; - } - -+static inline t_key prefix_mismatch(t_key key, struct tnode *n) -+{ -+ t_key prefix = n->key; -+ -+ return (key ^ prefix) & (prefix | -prefix); -+} -+ - int fib_table_lookup(struct fib_table *tb, const struct flowi4 *flp, - struct fib_result *res, int fib_flags) - { -- struct trie *t = (struct trie *) tb->tb_data; -+ struct trie *t = (struct trie *)tb->tb_data; - #ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS - struct trie_use_stats __percpu *stats = t->stats; - #endif -- int ret; -- struct tnode *n; -- struct tnode *pn; -- unsigned int pos, bits; -- t_key key = ntohl(flp->daddr); -- unsigned int chopped_off; -- t_key cindex = 0; -- unsigned int current_prefix_length = KEYLENGTH; -- struct tnode *cn; -- t_key pref_mismatch; -+ const t_key key = ntohl(flp->daddr); -+ struct tnode *n, *pn; -+ t_key cindex; -+ int ret = 1; - - rcu_read_lock(); - -@@ -1349,170 +1353,102 @@ int fib_table_lookup(struct fib_table *t - this_cpu_inc(stats->gets); - #endif - -- /* Just a leaf? */ -- if (IS_LEAF(n)) { -- ret = check_leaf(tb, t, n, key, flp, res, fib_flags); -- goto found; -- } -- - pn = n; -- chopped_off = 0; -- -- while (pn) { -- pos = pn->pos; -- bits = pn->bits; -+ cindex = 0; - -- if (!chopped_off) -- cindex = tkey_extract_bits(mask_pfx(key, current_prefix_length), -- pos, bits); -- -- n = tnode_get_child_rcu(pn, cindex); -- -- if (n == NULL) { --#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS -- this_cpu_inc(stats->null_node_hit); --#endif -- goto backtrace; -- } -+ /* Step 1: Travel to the longest prefix match in the trie */ -+ for (;;) { -+ unsigned long index = get_index(key, n); -+ -+ /* This bit of code is a bit tricky but it combines multiple -+ * checks into a single check. The prefix consists of the -+ * prefix plus zeros for the "bits" in the prefix. The index -+ * is the difference between the key and this value. From -+ * this we can actually derive several pieces of data. -+ * if !(index >> bits) -+ * we know the value is child index -+ * else -+ * we have a mismatch in skip bits and failed -+ */ -+ if (index >> n->bits) -+ break; - -- if (IS_LEAF(n)) { -- ret = check_leaf(tb, t, n, key, flp, res, fib_flags); -- if (ret > 0) -- goto backtrace; -+ /* we have found a leaf. Prefixes have already been compared */ -+ if (IS_LEAF(n)) - goto found; -- } -- -- cn = n; - -- /* -- * It's a tnode, and we can do some extra checks here if we -- * like, to avoid descending into a dead-end branch. -- * This tnode is in the parent's child array at index -- * key[p_pos..p_pos+p_bits] but potentially with some bits -- * chopped off, so in reality the index may be just a -- * subprefix, padded with zero at the end. -- * We can also take a look at any skipped bits in this -- * tnode - everything up to p_pos is supposed to be ok, -- * and the non-chopped bits of the index (se previous -- * paragraph) are also guaranteed ok, but the rest is -- * considered unknown. -- * -- * The skipped bits are key[pos+bits..cn->pos]. -- */ -- -- /* If current_prefix_length < pos+bits, we are already doing -- * actual prefix matching, which means everything from -- * pos+(bits-chopped_off) onward must be zero along some -- * branch of this subtree - otherwise there is *no* valid -- * prefix present. Here we can only check the skipped -- * bits. Remember, since we have already indexed into the -- * parent's child array, we know that the bits we chopped of -- * *are* zero. -+ /* only record pn and cindex if we are going to be chopping -+ * bits later. Otherwise we are just wasting cycles. - */ -- -- /* NOTA BENE: Checking only skipped bits -- for the new node here */ -- -- if (current_prefix_length < pos+bits) { -- if (tkey_extract_bits(cn->key, current_prefix_length, -- cn->pos - current_prefix_length) -- || !(cn->child[0])) -- goto backtrace; -+ if (index) { -+ pn = n; -+ cindex = index; - } - -- /* -- * If chopped_off=0, the index is fully validated and we -- * only need to look at the skipped bits for this, the new, -- * tnode. What we actually want to do is to find out if -- * these skipped bits match our key perfectly, or if we will -- * have to count on finding a matching prefix further down, -- * because if we do, we would like to have some way of -- * verifying the existence of such a prefix at this point. -- */ -- -- /* The only thing we can do at this point is to verify that -- * any such matching prefix can indeed be a prefix to our -- * key, and if the bits in the node we are inspecting that -- * do not match our key are not ZERO, this cannot be true. -- * Thus, find out where there is a mismatch (before cn->pos) -- * and verify that all the mismatching bits are zero in the -- * new tnode's key. -- */ -+ n = rcu_dereference(n->child[index]); -+ if (unlikely(!n)) -+ goto backtrace; -+ } - -- /* -- * Note: We aren't very concerned about the piece of -- * the key that precede pn->pos+pn->bits, since these -- * have already been checked. The bits after cn->pos -- * aren't checked since these are by definition -- * "unknown" at this point. Thus, what we want to see -- * is if we are about to enter the "prefix matching" -- * state, and in that case verify that the skipped -- * bits that will prevail throughout this subtree are -- * zero, as they have to be if we are to find a -- * matching prefix. -+ /* Step 2: Sort out leaves and begin backtracing for longest prefix */ -+ for (;;) { -+ /* record the pointer where our next node pointer is stored */ -+ struct tnode __rcu **cptr = n->child; -+ -+ /* This test verifies that none of the bits that differ -+ * between the key and the prefix exist in the region of -+ * the lsb and higher in the prefix. - */ -+ if (unlikely(prefix_mismatch(key, n))) -+ goto backtrace; - -- pref_mismatch = mask_pfx(cn->key ^ key, cn->pos); -+ /* exit out and process leaf */ -+ if (unlikely(IS_LEAF(n))) -+ break; - -- /* -- * In short: If skipped bits in this node do not match -- * the search key, enter the "prefix matching" -- * state.directly. -+ /* Don't bother recording parent info. Since we are in -+ * prefix match mode we will have to come back to wherever -+ * we started this traversal anyway - */ -- if (pref_mismatch) { -- /* fls(x) = __fls(x) + 1 */ -- int mp = KEYLENGTH - __fls(pref_mismatch) - 1; -- -- if (tkey_extract_bits(cn->key, mp, cn->pos - mp) != 0) -- goto backtrace; -- -- if (current_prefix_length >= cn->pos) -- current_prefix_length = mp; -- } -- -- pn = n; /* Descend */ -- chopped_off = 0; -- continue; - -+ while ((n = rcu_dereference(*cptr)) == NULL) { - backtrace: -- chopped_off++; -- -- /* As zero don't change the child key (cindex) */ -- while ((chopped_off <= pn->bits) -- && !(cindex & (1<<(chopped_off-1)))) -- chopped_off++; -- -- /* Decrease current_... with bits chopped off */ -- if (current_prefix_length > pn->pos + pn->bits - chopped_off) -- current_prefix_length = pn->pos + pn->bits -- - chopped_off; -- -- /* -- * Either we do the actual chop off according or if we have -- * chopped off all bits in this tnode walk up to our parent. -- */ -- -- if (chopped_off <= pn->bits) { -- cindex &= ~(1 << (chopped_off-1)); -- } else { -- struct tnode *parent = node_parent_rcu(pn); -- if (!parent) -- goto failed; -- -- /* Get Child's index */ -- cindex = tkey_extract_bits(pn->key, parent->pos, parent->bits); -- pn = parent; -- chopped_off = 0; -- - #ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS -- this_cpu_inc(stats->backtrack); -+ if (!n) -+ this_cpu_inc(stats->null_node_hit); - #endif -- goto backtrace; -+ /* If we are at cindex 0 there are no more bits for -+ * us to strip at this level so we must ascend back -+ * up one level to see if there are any more bits to -+ * be stripped there. -+ */ -+ while (!cindex) { -+ t_key pkey = pn->key; -+ -+ pn = node_parent_rcu(pn); -+ if (unlikely(!pn)) -+ goto failed; -+#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS -+ this_cpu_inc(stats->backtrack); -+#endif -+ /* Get Child's index */ -+ cindex = get_index(pkey, pn); -+ } -+ -+ /* strip the least significant bit from the cindex */ -+ cindex &= cindex - 1; -+ -+ /* grab pointer for next child node */ -+ cptr = &pn->child[cindex]; - } - } --failed: -- ret = 1; -+ - found: -+ /* Step 3: Process the leaf, if that fails fall back to backtracing */ -+ ret = check_leaf(tb, t, n, key, flp, res, fib_flags); -+ if (unlikely(ret > 0)) -+ goto backtrace; -+failed: - rcu_read_unlock(); - return ret; - } |