1 files changed, 0 insertions, 88 deletions
diff --git a/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/061-0001-OpenSSL-Use-constant-time-operations-for-private-big.patch b/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/061-0001-OpenSSL-Use-constant-time-operations-for-private-big.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 7a73b09ff9..0000000000
--- a/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/061-0001-OpenSSL-Use-constant-time-operations-for-private-big.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-From d42c477cc794163a3757956bbffca5cea000923c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:43:03 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 01/14] OpenSSL: Use constant time operations for private
- bignums
-
-This helps in reducing measurable timing differences in operations
-involving private information. BoringSSL has removed BN_FLG_CONSTTIME
-and expects specific constant time functions to be called instead, so a
-bit different approach is needed depending on which library is used.
-
-The main operation that needs protection against side channel attacks is
-BN_mod_exp() that depends on private keys (the public key validation
-step in crypto_dh_derive_secret() is an exception that can use the
-faster version since it does not depend on private keys).
-
-crypto_bignum_div() is currently used only in SAE FFC case with not
-safe-prime groups and only with values that do not depend on private
-keys, so it is not critical to protect it.
-
-crypto_bignum_inverse() is currently used only in SAE FFC PWE
-derivation. The additional protection here is targeting only OpenSSL.
-BoringSSL may need conversion to using BN_mod_inverse_blinded().
-
-This is related to CVE-2019-9494 and CVE-2019-9495.
-
-Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
----
- src/crypto/crypto_openssl.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-
---- a/src/crypto/crypto_openssl.c
-+++ b/src/crypto/crypto_openssl.c
-@@ -549,7 +549,8 @@ int crypto_mod_exp(const u8 *base, size_
- 	    bn_result == NULL)
- 		goto error;
- 
--	if (BN_mod_exp(bn_result, bn_base, bn_exp, bn_modulus, ctx) != 1)
-+	if (BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime(bn_result, bn_base, bn_exp, bn_modulus,
-+				      ctx, NULL) != 1)
- 		goto error;
- 
- 	*result_len = BN_bn2bin(bn_result, result);
-@@ -1295,8 +1296,9 @@ int crypto_bignum_exptmod(const struct c
- 	bnctx = BN_CTX_new();
- 	if (bnctx == NULL)
- 		return -1;
--	res = BN_mod_exp((BIGNUM *) d, (const BIGNUM *) a, (const BIGNUM *) b,
--			 (const BIGNUM *) c, bnctx);
-+	res = BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime((BIGNUM *) d, (const BIGNUM *) a,
-+					(const BIGNUM *) b, (const BIGNUM *) c,
-+					bnctx, NULL);
- 	BN_CTX_free(bnctx);
- 
- 	return res ? 0 : -1;
-@@ -1315,6 +1317,11 @@ int crypto_bignum_inverse(const struct c
- 	bnctx = BN_CTX_new();
- 	if (bnctx == NULL)
- 		return -1;
-+#ifdef OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL
-+	/* TODO: use BN_mod_inverse_blinded() ? */
-+#else /* OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL */
-+	BN_set_flags((BIGNUM *) a, BN_FLG_CONSTTIME);
-+#endif /* OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL */
- 	res = BN_mod_inverse((BIGNUM *) c, (const BIGNUM *) a,
- 			     (const BIGNUM *) b, bnctx);
- 	BN_CTX_free(bnctx);
-@@ -1348,6 +1355,9 @@ int crypto_bignum_div(const struct crypt
- 	bnctx = BN_CTX_new();
- 	if (bnctx == NULL)
- 		return -1;
-+#ifndef OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL
-+	BN_set_flags((BIGNUM *) a, BN_FLG_CONSTTIME);
-+#endif /* OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL */
- 	res = BN_div((BIGNUM *) c, NULL, (const BIGNUM *) a,
- 		     (const BIGNUM *) b, bnctx);
- 	BN_CTX_free(bnctx);
-@@ -1439,8 +1449,8 @@ int crypto_bignum_legendre(const struct
- 	    /* exp = (p-1) / 2 */
- 	    !BN_sub(exp, (const BIGNUM *) p, BN_value_one()) ||
- 	    !BN_rshift1(exp, exp) ||
--	    !BN_mod_exp(tmp, (const BIGNUM *) a, exp, (const BIGNUM *) p,
--			bnctx))
-+	    !BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime(tmp, (const BIGNUM *) a, exp,
-+				       (const BIGNUM *) p, bnctx, NULL))
- 		goto fail;
- 
- 	if (BN_is_word(tmp, 1))