kernel: update bcma by backporting 4.4 and 4.5 patches

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 48111

3 files changed, 0 insertions, 195 deletions

diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9f2cd396ae..0000000000
--- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
-From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall.
-Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on
-mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to
-do the same in bcma.
-Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM
-proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom.
-
-Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
----
-While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and
-module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def
-tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if
-bcma_modinit_early failed.
-
-Do you see any better idea of solving this?
----
- drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
-+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
-@@ -637,13 +637,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev
- 			      core->id.rev, core->id.class);
- }
- 
-+/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */
-+static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void)
-+{
-+	return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
-+}
-+#ifndef MODULE
-+fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early);
-+#endif
-+
-+/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */
- static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
- {
- 	int err;
- 
--	err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
-+#ifdef MODULE
-+	err = bcma_modinit_early();
- 	if (err)
- 		return err;
-+#endif
- 
- 	err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver();
- 	if (err) {
-@@ -660,7 +672,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
- 
- 	return err;
- }
--fs_initcall(bcma_modinit);
-+module_init(bcma_modinit);
- 
- static void __exit bcma_modexit(void)
- {
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.3/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.3/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 4e5793bc86..0000000000
--- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.3/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
-From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall.
-Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on
-mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to
-do the same in bcma.
-Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM
-proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom.
-
-Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
----
-While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and
-module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def
-tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if
-bcma_modinit_early failed.
-
-Do you see any better idea of solving this?
----
- drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
-+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
-@@ -673,13 +673,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev
- 			      core->id.rev, core->id.class);
- }
- 
-+/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */
-+static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void)
-+{
-+	return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
-+}
-+#ifndef MODULE
-+fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early);
-+#endif
-+
-+/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */
- static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
- {
- 	int err;
- 
--	err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
-+#ifdef MODULE
-+	err = bcma_modinit_early();
- 	if (err)
- 		return err;
-+#endif
- 
- 	err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver();
- 	if (err) {
-@@ -696,7 +708,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
- 
- 	return err;
- }
--fs_initcall(bcma_modinit);
-+module_init(bcma_modinit);
- 
- static void __exit bcma_modexit(void)
- {
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.4/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.4/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index eb9ab2fe8a..0000000000
--- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.4/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
-From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall.
-Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on
-mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to
-do the same in bcma.
-Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM
-proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom.
-
-Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
----
-While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and
-module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def
-tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if
-bcma_modinit_early failed.
-
-Do you see any better idea of solving this?
----
- drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
-+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
-@@ -668,13 +668,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev
- 			      core->id.rev, core->id.class);
- }
- 
-+/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */
-+static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void)
-+{
-+	return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
-+}
-+#ifndef MODULE
-+fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early);
-+#endif
-+
-+/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */
- static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
- {
- 	int err;
- 
--	err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
-+#ifdef MODULE
-+	err = bcma_modinit_early();
- 	if (err)
- 		return err;
-+#endif
- 
- 	err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver();
- 	if (err) {
-@@ -691,7 +703,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
- 
- 	return err;
- }
--fs_initcall(bcma_modinit);
-+module_init(bcma_modinit);
- 
- static void __exit bcma_modexit(void)
- {