| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The copy overhead can be quite expensive
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenWRT changed the default fq_codel sch->limit from 10240 to 1024,
without also adjusting q->flows_cnt. Eric Dumazet explains below that
you must also adjust the buckets (q->flows_cnt) for this not to break.
Eric explains: Limit of 1024 packets and 1024 flows is not wise I think.
(If all buckets are in use, each bucket has a virtual queue of 1 packet,
which is almost the same than having no queue at all)
I suggest to have at least 8 packets per bucket, to let Codel have a
chance to trigger. So you could either reduce number of buckets to 128
(if memory is tight), or increase limit to 8192.
flows_cnt is now set to 1024/8=128
Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cpu load with higher speed (#21326)
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@47811 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|
|
Based on 4.4-rc3. Runtime tested on MIPS.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@47701 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
|