diff options
| author | John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> | 2016-02-25 10:14:01 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> | 2016-02-25 10:14:01 +0000 |
| commit | ddab8d8608f1f0676ca2155e0415cc59a142af02 (patch) | |
| tree | 3aceda2ffabad3e91c01170ed7d5e348960b84a4 /target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch | |
| parent | e0635cd10de03f8a631992ac782051599267eff6 (diff) | |
| download | master-187ad058-ddab8d8608f1f0676ca2155e0415cc59a142af02.tar.gz master-187ad058-ddab8d8608f1f0676ca2155e0415cc59a142af02.tar.bz2 master-187ad058-ddab8d8608f1f0676ca2155e0415cc59a142af02.zip | |
brcm2708: switch to linux 4.4 and update patches
As usual these patches were extracted from:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commits/rpi-4.4.y
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@48765 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch index f3b9839739..a970d04243 100644 --- a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch +++ b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0095-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -From c5200dcf1298dc6789a88640ab581e364d92282b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 72d3af528b1ac1e2606d252d49f3f50281976f5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:32:24 -0700 -Subject: [PATCH 095/127] drm/vc4: Use job_lock to protect seqno_cb_list. +Subject: [PATCH 095/156] drm/vc4: Use job_lock to protect seqno_cb_list. We're (mostly) not supposed to be using struct_mutex in drivers these days. |