diff options
| author | John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> | 2015-12-17 09:29:22 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> | 2015-12-17 09:29:22 +0000 |
| commit | 0007bb9f1edb182c53eeb611978f5507d7dfb9e0 (patch) | |
| tree | cafe9ab7cc0fbdab154f247475c7981eccb34969 /target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.1/0174-bcm2835-camera-check-for-scene-not-being-found.patch | |
| parent | 346baa542771fba75056eabbe346bfa0b673732f (diff) | |
| download | master-187ad058-0007bb9f1edb182c53eeb611978f5507d7dfb9e0.tar.gz master-187ad058-0007bb9f1edb182c53eeb611978f5507d7dfb9e0.tar.bz2 master-187ad058-0007bb9f1edb182c53eeb611978f5507d7dfb9e0.zip | |
brcm2708: update 4.1 patches
As usual, this patches were taken (and rebased) from
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commits/rpi-4.1.y
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@47922 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.1/0174-bcm2835-camera-check-for-scene-not-being-found.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.1/0174-bcm2835-camera-check-for-scene-not-being-found.patch | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.1/0174-bcm2835-camera-check-for-scene-not-being-found.patch b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.1/0174-bcm2835-camera-check-for-scene-not-being-found.patch index 2365caf195..70b2c72056 100644 --- a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.1/0174-bcm2835-camera-check-for-scene-not-being-found.patch +++ b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.1/0174-bcm2835-camera-check-for-scene-not-being-found.patch @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -From ebdecd6494e5b67306b5e247180f5d5c4b3d8f27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From e9b089f99bf763bf803f82201cbb35251b6d8945 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 07:33:39 -0400 -Subject: [PATCH 174/203] bcm2835: camera: check for scene not being found +Subject: [PATCH 174/222] bcm2835: camera: check for scene not being found static analysis by cppcheck detected some potential NULL pointer dereference issues: |