1 files changed, 144 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/advanced/pycpp/utilities.rst b/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/advanced/pycpp/utilities.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..369e7c94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/advanced/pycpp/utilities.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+Utilities
+#########
+
+Using Python's print function in C++
+====================================
+
+The usual way to write output in C++ is using ``std::cout`` while in Python one
+would use ``print``. Since these methods use different buffers, mixing them can
+lead to output order issues. To resolve this, pybind11 modules can use the
+:func:`py::print` function which writes to Python's ``sys.stdout`` for consistency.
+
+Python's ``print`` function is replicated in the C++ API including optional
+keyword arguments ``sep``, ``end``, ``file``, ``flush``. Everything works as
+expected in Python:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    py::print(1, 2.0, "three"); // 1 2.0 three
+    py::print(1, 2.0, "three", "sep"_a="-"); // 1-2.0-three
+
+    auto args = py::make_tuple("unpacked", true);
+    py::print("->", *args, "end"_a="<-"); // -> unpacked True <-
+
+.. _ostream_redirect:
+
+Capturing standard output from ostream
+======================================
+
+Often, a library will use the streams ``std::cout`` and ``std::cerr`` to print,
+but this does not play well with Python's standard ``sys.stdout`` and ``sys.stderr``
+redirection. Replacing a library's printing with `py::print <print>` may not
+be feasible. This can be fixed using a guard around the library function that
+redirects output to the corresponding Python streams:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    #include <pybind11/iostream.h>
+
+    ...
+
+    // Add a scoped redirect for your noisy code
+    m.def("noisy_func", []() {
+        py::scoped_ostream_redirect stream(
+            std::cout,                               // std::ostream&
+            py::module::import("sys").attr("stdout") // Python output
+        );
+        call_noisy_func();
+    });
+
+This method respects flushes on the output streams and will flush if needed
+when the scoped guard is destroyed. This allows the output to be redirected in
+real time, such as to a Jupyter notebook. The two arguments, the C++ stream and
+the Python output, are optional, and default to standard output if not given. An
+extra type, `py::scoped_estream_redirect <scoped_estream_redirect>`, is identical
+except for defaulting to ``std::cerr`` and ``sys.stderr``; this can be useful with
+`py::call_guard`, which allows multiple items, but uses the default constructor:
+
+.. code-block:: py
+
+    // Alternative: Call single function using call guard
+    m.def("noisy_func", &call_noisy_function,
+          py::call_guard<py::scoped_ostream_redirect,
+                         py::scoped_estream_redirect>());
+
+The redirection can also be done in Python with the addition of a context
+manager, using the `py::add_ostream_redirect() <add_ostream_redirect>` function:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    py::add_ostream_redirect(m, "ostream_redirect");
+
+The name in Python defaults to ``ostream_redirect`` if no name is passed.  This
+creates the following context manager in Python:
+
+.. code-block:: python
+
+    with ostream_redirect(stdout=True, stderr=True):
+        noisy_function()
+
+It defaults to redirecting both streams, though you can use the keyword
+arguments to disable one of the streams if needed.
+
+.. note::
+
+    The above methods will not redirect C-level output to file descriptors, such
+    as ``fprintf``. For those cases, you'll need to redirect the file
+    descriptors either directly in C or with Python's ``os.dup2`` function
+    in an operating-system dependent way.
+
+.. _eval:
+
+Evaluating Python expressions from strings and files
+====================================================
+
+pybind11 provides the `eval`, `exec` and `eval_file` functions to evaluate
+Python expressions and statements. The following example illustrates how they
+can be used.
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    // At beginning of file
+    #include <pybind11/eval.h>
+
+    ...
+
+    // Evaluate in scope of main module
+    py::object scope = py::module::import("__main__").attr("__dict__");
+
+    // Evaluate an isolated expression
+    int result = py::eval("my_variable + 10", scope).cast<int>();
+
+    // Evaluate a sequence of statements
+    py::exec(
+        "print('Hello')\n"
+        "print('world!');",
+        scope);
+
+    // Evaluate the statements in an separate Python file on disk
+    py::eval_file("script.py", scope);
+
+C++11 raw string literals are also supported and quite handy for this purpose.
+The only requirement is that the first statement must be on a new line following
+the raw string delimiter ``R"(``, ensuring all lines have common leading indent:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    py::exec(R"(
+        x = get_answer()
+        if x == 42:
+            print('Hello World!')
+        else:
+            print('Bye!')
+        )", scope
+    );
+
+.. note::
+
+    `eval` and `eval_file` accept a template parameter that describes how the
+    string/file should be interpreted. Possible choices include ``eval_expr``
+    (isolated expression), ``eval_single_statement`` (a single statement, return
+    value is always ``none``), and ``eval_statements`` (sequence of statements,
+    return value is always ``none``). `eval` defaults to  ``eval_expr``,
+    `eval_file` defaults to ``eval_statements`` and `exec` is just a shortcut
+    for ``eval<eval_statements>``.