diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'googlemock/docs')
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/CookBook.md | 12 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/Documentation.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md | 10 |
5 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md index adfc6916..d5757b23 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ Notes: * These matchers can also match: 1. a native array passed by reference (e.g. in `Foo(const int (&a)[5])`), and - 1. an array passed as a pointer and a count (e.g. in `Bar(const T* buffer, int len)` -- see [Multi-argument Matchers](#Multiargument_Matchers.md)). + 1. an array passed as a pointer and a count (e.g. in `Bar(const T* buffer, int len)` -- see [Multi-argument Matchers](#multiargument-matchers)). * The array being matched may be multi-dimensional (i.e. its elements can be arrays). * `m` in `Pointwise(m, ...)` should be a matcher for `::testing::tuple<T, U>` where `T` and `U` are the element type of the actual container and the expected container, respectively. For example, to compare two `Foo` containers where `Foo` doesn't support `operator==` but has an `Equals()` method, one might write: diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md index 0b361387..52091109 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md @@ -2237,7 +2237,7 @@ Mocking a method that takes and/or returns move-only types presents some challenges, but nothing insurmountable. This recipe shows you how you can do it. Note that the support for move-only method arguments was only introduced to gMock in April 2017; in older code, you may find more complex -[workarounds](#LegacyMoveOnly) for lack of this feature. +[workarounds](#legacy-workarounds-for-move-only-types) for lack of this feature. Let’s say we are working on a fictional project that lets one post and share snippets called “buzzes”. Your code uses these types: @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ action: ``` If you are not happy with the default action, you can tweak it as usual; see -[Setting Default Actions](#OnCall). +[Setting Default Actions](#setting-the-default-actions-for-a-mock-method). If you just need to return a pre-defined move-only value, you can use the `Return(ByMove(...))` action: @@ -2345,7 +2345,7 @@ created and returned. You cannot do this with `Return(ByMove(...))`. That covers returning move-only values; but how do we work with methods accepting move-only arguments? The answer is that they work normally, although some actions will not compile when any of method's arguments are move-only. You -can always use `Return`, or a [lambda or functor](#FunctionsAsActions): +can always use `Return`, or a [lambda or functor](#using-functionsmethodsfunctors-as-actions): ```cpp using ::testing::Unused; @@ -2366,7 +2366,7 @@ implemented yet. If this is blocking you, please file a bug. A few actions (e.g. `DoAll`) copy their arguments internally, so they can never work with non-copyable objects; you'll have to use functors instead. -##### Legacy workarounds for move-only types {#LegacyMoveOnly} +##### Legacy workarounds for move-only types Support for move-only function arguments was only introduced to gMock in April 2017. In older code, you may encounter the following workaround for the lack of @@ -2821,7 +2821,7 @@ and you should see an `OUTPUT_DIR` directory being created with files These three files contain everything you need to use Google Mock (and Google Test). Just copy them to anywhere you want and you are ready to write tests and use mocks. You can use the -[scrpts/test/Makefile](../scripts/test/Makefile) file as an example on how to compile your tests +[make/Makefile](../make/Makefile) file as an example on how to compile your tests against them. # Extending Google Mock # @@ -3655,6 +3655,6 @@ This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the user can figure it out. -[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values) +[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#teaching-googletest-how-to-print-your-values) explains how to extend the printer to do a better job at printing your particular type than to dump the bytes. diff --git a/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md b/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md index 16083e70..a42bd113 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/Documentation.md @@ -11,5 +11,5 @@ the respective git branch/tag).** To contribute code to Google Mock, read: - * [CONTRIBUTING](../CONTRIBUTING.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. + * [CONTRIBUTING](../../CONTRIBUTING.md) -- read this _before_ writing your first patch. * [Pump Manual](../../googletest/docs/PumpManual.md) -- how we generate some of Google Mock's source files. diff --git a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md index 418461de..e2a430f8 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ sometimes causes the test program to crash. You'll still be able to notice that the test has failed, but it's not a graceful failure. A better solution is to use Google Test's -[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events) +[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#extending-googletest-by-handling-test-events) to report a test failure to your testing framework properly. You'll need to implement the `OnTestPartResult()` method of the event listener interface, but it should be straightforward. diff --git a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md index c7fa47f7..e91f038c 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Please send your questions to the [googlemock](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) discussion group. If you need help with compiler errors, make sure you have -tried [Google Mock Doctor](#How_am_I_supposed_to_make_sense_of_these_horrible_template_error.md) first. +tried [Google Mock Doctor](#how-am-i-supposed-to-make-sense-of-these-horrible-template-errors) first. ## When I call a method on my mock object, the method for the real object is invoked instead. What's the problem? ## @@ -474,10 +474,10 @@ verbose level. If you find yourself needing to perform some action that's not supported by Google Mock directly, remember that you can define your own actions using -[MakeAction()](CookBook.md#writing-new-actions) or -[MakePolymorphicAction()](CookBook.md#writing_new_polymorphic_actions), +[MakeAction()](CookBook.md#writing-new-actions-quickly) or +[MakePolymorphicAction()](CookBook.md#writing-new-polymorphic-actions), or you can write a stub function and invoke it using -[Invoke()](CookBook.md#using-functions_methods_functors). +[Invoke()](CookBook.md#using-functionsmethodsfunctors-as-actions). ## MOCK\_METHODn()'s second argument looks funny. Why don't you use the MOCK\_METHODn(Method, return\_type, arg\_1, ..., arg\_n) syntax? ## @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ when the mock method is called. `SetArgPointee()` says what the side effect is, but doesn't say what the return value should be. You need `DoAll()` to chain a `SetArgPointee()` with a `Return()`. -See this [recipe](CookBook.md#mocking_side_effects) for more details and an example. +See this [recipe](CookBook.md#mocking-side-effects) for more details and an example. ## My question is not in your FAQ! ## |