2 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/cheat_sheet.md b/googlemock/docs/cheat_sheet.md
index e839fa9d..d0b68cea 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/cheat_sheet.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/cheat_sheet.md
@@ -857,12 +857,12 @@ you can do it earlier:
 using ::testing::Mock;
 ...
 // Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj;
-// returns true iff successful.
+// returns true if successful.
 Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&mock_obj);
 ...
 // Verifies and removes the expectations on mock_obj;
 // also removes the default actions set by ON_CALL();
-// returns true iff successful.
+// returns true if successful.
 Mock::VerifyAndClear(&mock_obj);
 ```
 
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md b/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
index a858cd1f..ef831a76 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
@@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ arguments as *one* single tuple to the predicate.
 Have you noticed that a matcher is just a fancy predicate that also knows how to
 describe itself? Many existing algorithms take predicates as arguments (e.g.
 those defined in STL's `<algorithm>` header), and it would be a shame if gMock
-matchers are not allowed to participate.
+matchers were not allowed to participate.
 
 Luckily, you can use a matcher where a unary predicate functor is expected by
 wrapping it inside the `Matches()` function. For example,
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ what if you want to make sure the value *pointed to* by the pointer, instead of
 the pointer itself, has a certain property? Well, you can use the `Pointee(m)`
 matcher.
 
-`Pointee(m)` matches a pointer iff `m` matches the value the pointer points to.
+`Pointee(m)` matches a pointer if `m` matches the value the pointer points to.
 For example:
 
 ```cpp
@@ -2596,7 +2596,7 @@ However, if the action has its own state, you may be surprised if you share the
 action object. Suppose you have an action factory `IncrementCounter(init)` which
 creates an action that increments and returns a counter whose initial value is
 `init`, using two actions created from the same expression and using a shared
-action will exihibit different behaviors. Example:
+action will exhibit different behaviors. Example:
 
 ```cpp
   EXPECT_CALL(foo, DoThis())
@@ -3539,7 +3539,7 @@ class MatcherInterface {
  public:
   virtual ~MatcherInterface();
 
-  // Returns true iff the matcher matches x; also explains the match
+  // Returns true if the matcher matches x; also explains the match
   // result to 'listener'.
   virtual bool MatchAndExplain(T x, MatchResultListener* listener) const = 0;
 
@@ -3693,10 +3693,10 @@ class CardinalityInterface {
  public:
   virtual ~CardinalityInterface();
 
-  // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality.
+  // Returns true if call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality.
   virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0;
 
-  // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality.
+  // Returns true if call_count calls will saturate this cardinality.
   virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int call_count) const = 0;
 
   // Describes self to an ostream.