blob: c0137894c934133b2feb058b4c6227c8bc62f4e7 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
From 75d19b24aa3203d6c78e4c431c2cc07157ce12fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:15:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 15/21] cpufreq: mediatek: Handle sram regulator probe deferral
If the regulator_get_optional() call for the SRAM regulator returns
a probe deferral, we must bail out and retry probing later: failing
to do this will produce unstabilities on platforms requiring the
handling for this regulator.
Fixes: ffa7bdf7f344 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Make sram regulator optional")
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
@@ -439,9 +439,13 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct
/* Both presence and absence of sram regulator are valid cases. */
info->sram_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "sram");
- if (IS_ERR(info->sram_reg))
+ if (IS_ERR(info->sram_reg)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(info->sram_reg);
+ if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ goto out_free_resources;
+
info->sram_reg = NULL;
- else {
+ } else {
ret = regulator_enable(info->sram_reg);
if (ret) {
dev_warn(cpu_dev, "cpu%d: failed to enable vsram\n", cpu);
|
