1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
|
From df5c4d93c5a59cba0f7479a4cd4e22b50726ce88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:12:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 625/660] net: sfp: control TX_DISABLE and phy only from main
state machine
We initialise TX_DISABLE when the sfp cage is probed, and then
maintain its state in the main state machine. However, the module
state machine:
- negates it when detecting a newly inserted module when it's already
guaranteed to be negated.
- negates it when the module is removed, but the main state machine
will do this anyway.
Make TX_DISABLE entirely controlled by the main state machine.
The main state machine also probes the module for a PHY, and removes
the PHY when the the module is removed. Hence, removing the PHY in
sfp_sm_module_remove() is also redundant, and is a left-over from
when we tried to probe for the PHY from the module state machine.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -1492,11 +1492,6 @@ static void sfp_sm_mod_remove(struct sfp
sfp_hwmon_remove(sfp);
- if (sfp->mod_phy)
- sfp_sm_phy_detach(sfp);
-
- sfp_module_tx_disable(sfp);
-
memset(&sfp->id, 0, sizeof(sfp->id));
sfp->module_power_mW = 0;
@@ -1534,10 +1529,8 @@ static void sfp_sm_module(struct sfp *sf
switch (sfp->sm_mod_state) {
default:
- if (event == SFP_E_INSERT && sfp->attached) {
- sfp_module_tx_disable(sfp);
+ if (event == SFP_E_INSERT && sfp->attached)
sfp_sm_mod_next(sfp, SFP_MOD_PROBE, T_SERIAL);
- }
break;
case SFP_MOD_PROBE:
|
