1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
|
From 36595ef49aac284d386e1f9e8ac0910451ef40d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:26:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting
If a non-rate clock started by default with a parent that never
registered, core->req_rate will be 0. The expectation is that whenever
the parent will be registered, req_rate will be updated with the new
value that has just been computed.
However, if that clock is a mux, clk_set_parent() can also make that
clock no longer orphan. In this case however, we never update req_rate.
Let's make sure it's the case for the newly unorphan clock and all its
children.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 18 ++++
drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1757,6 +1757,23 @@ static void clk_core_update_orphan_statu
clk_core_update_orphan_status(child, is_orphan);
}
+/*
+ * Update the orphan rate and req_rate of @core and all its children.
+ */
+static void clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(struct clk_core *core)
+{
+ struct clk_core *child;
+ unsigned long parent_rate = 0;
+
+ if (core->parent)
+ parent_rate = core->parent->rate;
+
+ core->rate = core->req_rate = clk_recalc(core, parent_rate);
+
+ hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node)
+ clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(child);
+}
+
static void clk_reparent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *new_parent)
{
bool was_orphan = core->orphan;
@@ -1781,6 +1798,7 @@ static void clk_reparent(struct clk_core
}
core->parent = new_parent;
+ clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(core);
}
static struct clk_core *__clk_set_parent_before(struct clk_core *core,
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -577,6 +577,39 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_par
/*
* Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid
+ * parent, calling clk_drop_range() on the mux won't affect the parent
+ * rate.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_drop_range(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent;
+ unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate;
+ int ret;
+
+ parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+ parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_drop_range(clk);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate);
+
+ clk_put(parent);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid
* parent, the rate of the mux and its new parent are consistent.
*/
static void
@@ -605,6 +638,39 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_par
/*
* Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid
+ * parent, calling clk_put() on the mux won't affect the parent rate.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_put(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk *clk, *parent;
+ unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate;
+ int ret;
+
+ parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+ clk = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->hw, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, clk);
+
+ parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ clk_put(clk);
+
+ new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate);
+
+ clk_put(parent);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid
* parent, calling clk_set_rate_range() will affect the parent state if
* its rate is out of range.
*/
@@ -635,6 +701,41 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_par
}
/*
+ * Test that, for a mux that started orphan but got switched to a valid
+ * parent, calling clk_set_rate_range() won't affect the parent state if
+ * its rate is within range.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent;
+ unsigned long parent_rate, new_parent_rate;
+ int ret;
+
+ parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+ parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, parent_rate, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+ DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE - 1000,
+ DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE + 1000);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ new_parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_parent_rate, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, parent_rate, new_parent_rate);
+
+ clk_put(parent);
+}
+
+/*
* Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet,
* calling clk_set_rate_range() will succeed, and will be taken into
* account when rounding a rate.
@@ -660,8 +761,11 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_par
static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_get_parent),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_drop_range),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_get_rate),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_put),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate),
{}
};
@@ -946,6 +1050,132 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_tra
.test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases,
};
+struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx {
+ struct clk_dummy_context parent_parent_ctx;
+ struct clk_dummy_context parent_ctx;
+ struct clk_hw hw;
+};
+
+static int
+clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx;
+ int ret;
+
+ ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ctx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ test->priv = ctx;
+
+ ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init =
+ CLK_HW_INIT("intermediate-parent",
+ "root-parent",
+ &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops,
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+ ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ctx->hw.init =
+ CLK_HW_INIT("test-clk", "intermediate-parent",
+ &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops,
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+ ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ctx->parent_parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE;
+ ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw.init =
+ CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("root-parent",
+ &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
+ 0);
+ ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+
+ clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw);
+ clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
+ clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_parent_ctx.hw);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a clock whose parent used to be orphan, clk_get_rate()
+ * will return the proper rate.
+ */
+static void
+clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+ unsigned long rate;
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that, for a clock whose parent used to be orphan,
+ * clk_set_rate_range() won't affect its rate if it is already within
+ * range.
+ *
+ * See (for Exynos 4210):
+ * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/366a0232-bb4a-c357-6aa8-636e398e05eb@samsung.com/
+ */
+static void
+clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_set_range(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_single_parent_two_lvl_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+ unsigned long rate;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+ DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE - 1000,
+ DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE + 1000);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case
+clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_get_rate),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_set_range),
+ {}
+};
+
+/*
+ * Test suite for a basic, transparent, clock with a parent that is also
+ * such a clock. The parent's parent is registered last, while the
+ * parent and its child are registered in that order. The intermediate
+ * and leaf clocks will thus be orphan when registered, but the leaf
+ * clock itself will always have its parent and will never be
+ * reparented. Indeed, it's only orphan because its parent is.
+ *
+ * These tests are supposed to exercise the behaviour of the consumer
+ * API when dealing with an orphan clock, and how we deal with the
+ * transition to a valid parent.
+ */
+static struct kunit_suite
+clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_suite = {
+ .name = "clk-orphan-two-level-root-last-test",
+ .init = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_init,
+ .exit = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_exit,
+ .test_cases = clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_cases,
+};
+
/*
* Test that clk_set_rate_range won't return an error for a valid range
* and that it will make sure the rate of the clock is within the
@@ -1629,6 +1859,7 @@ kunit_test_suites(
&clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite,
&clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_suite,
&clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite,
+ &clk_orphan_two_level_root_last_test_suite,
&clk_range_test_suite,
&clk_range_maximize_test_suite,
&clk_range_minimize_test_suite,
|