diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch | 28 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 4cffad1f4e..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-5.10/033-v5.16-0016-ARM-dts-NSP-Fix-MX64-MX65-eeprom-node-name.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -From 56e4e548427240d85fd220460d0ab5987e1dec00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@gmail.com> -Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 22:37:50 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: NSP: Fix MX64/MX65 eeprom node name - -Running dtbs_check yields the following message when checking the -MX64/MX65 devicetree: -at24@50: $nodename:0: 'at24@50' does not match '^eeprom@[0-9a-f]{1,2}$' - -This patch fixes the issue by renaming the at24 node appropriately. - -Signed-off-by: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@gmail.com> -Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> ---- - arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx6x-common.dtsi | 2 +- - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) - ---- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx6x-common.dtsi -+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx6x-common.dtsi -@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ - &i2c0 { - status = "okay"; - -- at24@50 { -+ eeprom@50 { - compatible = "atmel,24c64"; - reg = <0x50>; - pagesize = <32>; |