aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/package/network/services/samba36/patches/031-CVE-2017-12163-v3.6.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'package/network/services/samba36/patches/031-CVE-2017-12163-v3.6.patch')
-rw-r--r--package/network/services/samba36/patches/031-CVE-2017-12163-v3.6.patch136
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/package/network/services/samba36/patches/031-CVE-2017-12163-v3.6.patch b/package/network/services/samba36/patches/031-CVE-2017-12163-v3.6.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d7faa1388d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/network/services/samba36/patches/031-CVE-2017-12163-v3.6.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+From: =?utf-8?q?Guido_G=C3=BCnther?= <agx@sigxcpu.org>
+Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:02:03 +0200
+Subject: CVE-2017-12163: s3:smbd: Prevent client short SMB1 write from
+ writing server memory to file.
+
+BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13020
+
+Author: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
+Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
+Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
+---
+ source3/smbd/reply.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/source3/smbd/reply.c
++++ b/source3/smbd/reply.c
+@@ -3979,6 +3979,9 @@ void reply_writebraw(struct smb_request
+ }
+
+ /* Ensure we don't write bytes past the end of this packet. */
++ /*
++ * This already protects us against CVE-2017-12163.
++ */
+ if (data + numtowrite > smb_base(req->inbuf) + smb_len(req->inbuf)) {
+ reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
+ error_to_writebrawerr(req);
+@@ -4080,6 +4083,11 @@ void reply_writebraw(struct smb_request
+ exit_server_cleanly("secondary writebraw failed");
+ }
+
++ /*
++ * We are not vulnerable to CVE-2017-12163
++ * here as we are guarenteed to have numtowrite
++ * bytes available - we just read from the client.
++ */
+ nwritten = write_file(req,fsp,buf+4,startpos+nwritten,numtowrite);
+ if (nwritten == -1) {
+ TALLOC_FREE(buf);
+@@ -4161,6 +4169,7 @@ void reply_writeunlock(struct smb_reques
+ connection_struct *conn = req->conn;
+ ssize_t nwritten = -1;
+ size_t numtowrite;
++ size_t remaining;
+ SMB_OFF_T startpos;
+ const char *data;
+ NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_OK;
+@@ -4193,6 +4202,17 @@ void reply_writeunlock(struct smb_reques
+ startpos = IVAL_TO_SMB_OFF_T(req->vwv+2, 0);
+ data = (const char *)req->buf + 3;
+
++ /*
++ * Ensure client isn't asking us to write more than
++ * they sent. CVE-2017-12163.
++ */
++ remaining = smbreq_bufrem(req, data);
++ if (numtowrite > remaining) {
++ reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
++ END_PROFILE(SMBwriteunlock);
++ return;
++ }
++
+ if (!fsp->print_file && numtowrite > 0) {
+ init_strict_lock_struct(fsp, (uint64_t)req->smbpid,
+ (uint64_t)startpos, (uint64_t)numtowrite, WRITE_LOCK,
+@@ -4274,6 +4294,7 @@ void reply_write(struct smb_request *req
+ {
+ connection_struct *conn = req->conn;
+ size_t numtowrite;
++ size_t remaining;
+ ssize_t nwritten = -1;
+ SMB_OFF_T startpos;
+ const char *data;
+@@ -4314,6 +4335,17 @@ void reply_write(struct smb_request *req
+ startpos = IVAL_TO_SMB_OFF_T(req->vwv+2, 0);
+ data = (const char *)req->buf + 3;
+
++ /*
++ * Ensure client isn't asking us to write more than
++ * they sent. CVE-2017-12163.
++ */
++ remaining = smbreq_bufrem(req, data);
++ if (numtowrite > remaining) {
++ reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
++ END_PROFILE(SMBwrite);
++ return;
++ }
++
+ if (!fsp->print_file) {
+ init_strict_lock_struct(fsp, (uint64_t)req->smbpid,
+ (uint64_t)startpos, (uint64_t)numtowrite, WRITE_LOCK,
+@@ -4525,6 +4557,9 @@ void reply_write_and_X(struct smb_reques
+ return;
+ }
+ } else {
++ /*
++ * This already protects us against CVE-2017-12163.
++ */
+ if (smb_doff > smblen || smb_doff + numtowrite < numtowrite ||
+ smb_doff + numtowrite > smblen) {
+ reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
+@@ -4894,6 +4929,7 @@ void reply_writeclose(struct smb_request
+ {
+ connection_struct *conn = req->conn;
+ size_t numtowrite;
++ size_t remaining;
+ ssize_t nwritten = -1;
+ NTSTATUS close_status = NT_STATUS_OK;
+ SMB_OFF_T startpos;
+@@ -4927,6 +4963,17 @@ void reply_writeclose(struct smb_request
+ mtime = convert_time_t_to_timespec(srv_make_unix_date3(req->vwv+4));
+ data = (const char *)req->buf + 1;
+
++ /*
++ * Ensure client isn't asking us to write more than
++ * they sent. CVE-2017-12163.
++ */
++ remaining = smbreq_bufrem(req, data);
++ if (numtowrite > remaining) {
++ reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
++ END_PROFILE(SMBwriteclose);
++ return;
++ }
++
+ if (!fsp->print_file) {
+ init_strict_lock_struct(fsp, (uint64_t)req->smbpid,
+ (uint64_t)startpos, (uint64_t)numtowrite, WRITE_LOCK,
+@@ -5497,6 +5544,9 @@ void reply_printwrite(struct smb_request
+
+ numtowrite = SVAL(req->buf, 1);
+
++ /*
++ * This already protects us against CVE-2017-12163.
++ */
+ if (req->buflen < numtowrite + 3) {
+ reply_nterror(req, NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER);
+ END_PROFILE(SMBsplwr);