ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs

The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts
index 80ece00074..2287a8c66a 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts
@@ -120,42 +120,42 @@
 		compatible = "gpio-leds";
 
 		backlight {
-			label = "asus:white:back";
+			label = "rp-n53:white:back";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 4 1>;
 		};
 
 		wifi0 {
-			label = "asus:blue:5g3";
+			label = "rp-n53:blue:5g3";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 5 1>;
 		};
 
 		wifi1 {
-			label = "asus:blue:5g2";
+			label = "rp-n53:blue:5g2";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 6 1>;
 		};
 
 		wifi2 {
-			label = "asus:blue:5g1";
+			label = "rp-n53:blue:5g1";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 7 1>;
 		};
 
 		wifi3 {
-			label = "asus:blue:wifi";
+			label = "rp-n53:blue:wifi";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 8 1>;
 		};
 
 		wifi4 {
-			label = "asus:blue:2g1";
+			label = "rp-n53:blue:2g1";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 9 1>;
 		};
 
 		wifi5 {
-			label = "asus:blue:2g2";
+			label = "rp-n53:blue:2g2";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 10 1>;
 		};
 
 		wifi6 {
-			label = "asus:blue:2g3";
+			label = "rp-n53:blue:2g3";
 			gpios = <&gpio1 11 1>;
 		};
 	};