From 1a392636a5b5694178d5f802efa9c220ff9dbabf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Crispin Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:24:34 +0000 Subject: ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach. The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target: * fixes wrong indentation * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body) * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files) * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds) Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz SVN-Revision: 46664 --- target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts') diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts index 80ece00074..2287a8c66a 100644 --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/RP-N53.dts @@ -120,42 +120,42 @@ compatible = "gpio-leds"; backlight { - label = "asus:white:back"; + label = "rp-n53:white:back"; gpios = <&gpio1 4 1>; }; wifi0 { - label = "asus:blue:5g3"; + label = "rp-n53:blue:5g3"; gpios = <&gpio1 5 1>; }; wifi1 { - label = "asus:blue:5g2"; + label = "rp-n53:blue:5g2"; gpios = <&gpio1 6 1>; }; wifi2 { - label = "asus:blue:5g1"; + label = "rp-n53:blue:5g1"; gpios = <&gpio1 7 1>; }; wifi3 { - label = "asus:blue:wifi"; + label = "rp-n53:blue:wifi"; gpios = <&gpio1 8 1>; }; wifi4 { - label = "asus:blue:2g1"; + label = "rp-n53:blue:2g1"; gpios = <&gpio1 9 1>; }; wifi5 { - label = "asus:blue:2g2"; + label = "rp-n53:blue:2g2"; gpios = <&gpio1 10 1>; }; wifi6 { - label = "asus:blue:2g3"; + label = "rp-n53:blue:2g3"; gpios = <&gpio1 11 1>; }; }; -- cgit v1.2.3