diff options
| author | Yutang Jiang <yutang.jiang@nxp.com> | 2016-12-24 01:11:32 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io> | 2017-01-03 15:19:15 +0100 |
| commit | 1866368a8ab8cacf73aa47f67138040d5620439d (patch) | |
| tree | 2b0dd1ba578016957856f59bf4b2edc54d6a46c5 /target/linux/layerscape/patches-4.4/7157-staging-fsl-mc-Remove-unneeded-else-following-a-retu.patch | |
| parent | c6d3a62919a7f993be625391d8593c84423aa021 (diff) | |
| download | upstream-1866368a8ab8cacf73aa47f67138040d5620439d.tar.gz upstream-1866368a8ab8cacf73aa47f67138040d5620439d.tar.bz2 upstream-1866368a8ab8cacf73aa47f67138040d5620439d.zip | |
layerscape: add ls1088ardb device support
LS1088A is an ARMv8 implementation combining eight ARM A53 processor
cores. The LS1088ARDB is an evaluatoin platform that supports the
LS1088A family SoCs.
Features summary:
- Eight 64-bit ARM v8 Cortex-A53 CPUs
- Data path acceleration architecture 2.0 (DPAA2)
- Ethernet interfaces
- QUADSPI flash, 3 PCIe, 2 USB, 1 SD, 2 DUARTs etc
Signed-off-by: Yutang Jiang <yutang.jiang@nxp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/layerscape/patches-4.4/7157-staging-fsl-mc-Remove-unneeded-else-following-a-retu.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | target/linux/layerscape/patches-4.4/7157-staging-fsl-mc-Remove-unneeded-else-following-a-retu.patch | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/layerscape/patches-4.4/7157-staging-fsl-mc-Remove-unneeded-else-following-a-retu.patch b/target/linux/layerscape/patches-4.4/7157-staging-fsl-mc-Remove-unneeded-else-following-a-retu.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ee0d1f62bc --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/layerscape/patches-4.4/7157-staging-fsl-mc-Remove-unneeded-else-following-a-retu.patch @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +From 5f82c6ff69f3a4bb635e619a893292bea711421e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com> +Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:22:50 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH 157/226] staging: fsl-mc: Remove unneeded else following a + return + +Remove unnecessary else when there is a return statement in the +corresponding if block. Coccinelle patch used: + +@rule1@ +expression e1; +@@ + + if (e1) { ... return ...; } +- else{ + ... +- } + +@rule2@ +expression e2; +statement s1; +@@ + + if(e2) { ... return ...; } +- else + s1 + +Signed-off-by: Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com> +Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> +--- + drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c | 3 +-- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) + +--- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c ++++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c +@@ -248,8 +248,7 @@ static bool fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(struct d + fsl_mc_get_root_dprc(dev, &root_dprc_dev); + if (!root_dprc_dev) + return false; +- else +- return dev == root_dprc_dev; ++ return dev == root_dprc_dev; + } + + static int get_dprc_icid(struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io, |