mac80211: Update to version 5.4.27

The removed patches are all integrated in the upstream version now.

Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>

2 files changed, 1 insertions, 89 deletions

diff --git a/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/020-rt2800-remove-errornous-duplicate-condition.patch b/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/020-rt2800-remove-errornous-duplicate-condition.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 91d12b51a2..0000000000
--- a/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/020-rt2800-remove-errornous-duplicate-condition.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-From patchwork Sat Nov  2 17:47:01 2019
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
-X-Patchwork-Id: 11224189
-X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com
-Return-Path: <SRS0=CgQo=Y2=vger.kernel.org=linux-wireless-owner@kernel.org>
-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 18:47:01 +0100
-From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
-To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
-Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>,
-        wbob <wbob@jify.de>
-Subject: [PATCH v2] rt2800: remove errornous duplicate condition
-Message-ID: <20191102174701.GA1489@makrotopia.org>
-References: <20191102154639.GA4589@redhat.com>
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Disposition: inline
-In-Reply-To: <20191102154639.GA4589@redhat.com>
-User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
-Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
-Precedence: bulk
-List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>
-X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
-
-On 2019-10-28 06:07, wbob wrote:
-> Hello Roman,
->
-> while reading around drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
-> I stumbled on what I think is an edit of yours made in error in march
-> 2017:
->
-> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/41977e86#diff-dae5dc10da180f3b055809a48118e18aR5281
->
-> RT6352 in line 5281 should not have been introduced as the "else if"
-> below line 5291 can then not take effect for a RT6352 device. Another
-> possibility is for line 5291 to be not for RT6352, but this seems
-> very unlikely. Are you able to clarify still after this substantial time?
->
-> 5277: static int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
-> ...
-> 5279:  } else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
-> 5280:         rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392) ||
-> 5281:         rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
-> ...
-> 5291:  } else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
-> ...
-
-Hence remove errornous line 5281 to make the driver actually
-execute the correct initialization routine for MT7620 chips.
-
-As it was requested by Stanislaw Gruszka remove setting values of
-MIMO_PS_CFG and TX_PIN_CFG. MIMO_PS_CFG is responsible for MIMO
-power-safe mode (which is disabled), hence we can drop setting it.
-TX_PIN_CFG is set correctly in other functions, and as setting this
-value breaks some devices, rather don't set it here during init, but
-only modify it later on.
-
-Fixes: 41977e86c984 ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620")
-Reported-by: wbob <wbob@jify.de>
-Reported-by: Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>
-Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
-Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
----
- drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 5 +----
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
-+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
-@@ -5839,8 +5839,7 @@ static int rt2800_init_registers(struct
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_TXBF_CFG_0, 0x8000fc21);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_TXBF_CFG_3, 0x00009c40);
- 	} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
--		   rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392) ||
--		   rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
-+		   rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392)) {
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00080606);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
-@@ -5854,8 +5853,6 @@ static int rt2800_init_registers(struct
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000401);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x000C0000);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
--		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, MIMO_PS_CFG, 0x00000002);
--		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_PIN_CFG, 0x00150F0F);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_ALC_VGA3, 0x00000000);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX0_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
- 		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX1_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
diff --git a/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/612-rt2x00-led-tpt-trigger-support.patch b/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/612-rt2x00-led-tpt-trigger-support.patch
index 25d15b617f..70f8d06e24 100644
--- a/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/612-rt2x00-led-tpt-trigger-support.patch
+++ b/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/612-rt2x00-led-tpt-trigger-support.patch
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Tested-by: Christoph Krapp <achterin@googlemail.com>
  static int rt2x00lib_probe_hw(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
  {
  	struct hw_mode_spec *spec = &rt2x00dev->spec;
-@@ -1211,6 +1225,10 @@ static int rt2x00lib_probe_hw(struct rt2
+@@ -1211,6 +1224,10 @@ static int rt2x00lib_probe_hw(struct rt2
  
  #undef RT2X00_TASKLET_INIT