Do not overload mount-call - trying to reduce confusion

The behaviour of calling 'mount' differed depending on whether it called
the busybox-mount, the mount of util-linux, the mount defined in
/lib/functions.sh and /lib/functions/boot.sh

/etc/preinit even included /lib/functions.sh and /lib/functions/boot.sh,
both re-defining 'mount'.

SVN-Revision: 34792

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh b/package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh
index e6de34849a..e796c7bacd 100644
--- a/package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh
+++ b/package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh
@@ -36,16 +36,16 @@ install_bin() { # <file> [ <symlink> ... ]
 pivot() { # <new_root> <old_root>
 	mount | grep "on $1 type" 2>&- 1>&- || mount -o bind $1 $1
 	mkdir -p $1$2 $1/proc $1/sys $1/dev $1/tmp $1/overlay && \
-	mount -o move /proc $1/proc && \
+	mount -o noatime,move /proc $1/proc && \
 	pivot_root $1 $1$2 || {
         umount $1 $1
 		return 1
 	}
 
-	mount -o move $2/sys /sys
-	mount -o move $2/dev /dev
-	mount -o move $2/tmp /tmp
-	mount -o move $2/overlay /overlay 2>&-
+	mount -o noatime,move $2/sys /sys
+	mount -o noatime,move $2/dev /dev
+	mount -o noatime,move $2/tmp /tmp
+	mount -o noatime,move $2/overlay /overlay 2>&-
 	return 0
 }
 
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ run_ramfs() { # <command> [...]
 	umount -l /mnt
 
 	grep /overlay /proc/mounts > /dev/null && {
-		mount -o remount,ro /overlay
+		mount -o noatime,remount,ro /overlay
 		umount -l /overlay
 	}