aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>2010-07-10 00:48:37 +0000
committerFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>2010-07-10 00:48:37 +0000
commitfbff44c98ad73009c9f3f17521ad8ac1d9453607 (patch)
tree5172e568b9b6d17439e487e0af60a9bea2e6d99f
parent482557bc886ac4f031f4e784e2466367fd47d65c (diff)
downloadupstream-fbff44c98ad73009c9f3f17521ad8ac1d9453607.tar.gz
upstream-fbff44c98ad73009c9f3f17521ad8ac1d9453607.tar.bz2
upstream-fbff44c98ad73009c9f3f17521ad8ac1d9453607.zip
Get rid of the b44 'BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 80000000 of register 428 to clear.' spam.
more and more users are getting confused by this, and consider it a regression in brcm47xx, because brcm-2.4 was not showing this message. It's not particularly interesting for debugging, most of the time it only happens because of an unconnected port. SVN-Revision: 22110
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch17
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch2
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch17
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch2
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch16
-rw-r--r--target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.35/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch16
6 files changed, 68 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..dbd46aee64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
++++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
+@@ -189,11 +189,13 @@ static int b44_wait_bit(struct b44 *bp,
+ udelay(10);
+ }
+ if (i == timeout) {
+- printk(KERN_ERR PFX "%s: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit %08x of register "
++#if 0
++ printk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "%s: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit %08x of register "
+ "%lx to %s.\n",
+ bp->dev->name,
+ bit, reg,
+ (clear ? "clear" : "set"));
++#endif
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ return 0;
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch
index a9b2db586a..2cfa824cc7 100644
--- a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.32/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
+++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
-@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static int b44_rx(struct b44 *bp, int bu
+@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static int b44_rx(struct b44 *bp, int bu
struct sk_buff *copy_skb;
b44_recycle_rx(bp, cons, bp->rx_prod);
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..dbd46aee64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
++++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
+@@ -189,11 +189,13 @@ static int b44_wait_bit(struct b44 *bp,
+ udelay(10);
+ }
+ if (i == timeout) {
+- printk(KERN_ERR PFX "%s: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit %08x of register "
++#if 0
++ printk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "%s: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit %08x of register "
+ "%lx to %s.\n",
+ bp->dev->name,
+ bit, reg,
+ (clear ? "clear" : "set"));
++#endif
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ return 0;
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch
index a9b2db586a..2cfa824cc7 100644
--- a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.33/813-use_netdev_alloc_skb.patch
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
+++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
-@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static int b44_rx(struct b44 *bp, int bu
+@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static int b44_rx(struct b44 *bp, int bu
struct sk_buff *copy_skb;
b44_recycle_rx(bp, cons, bp->rx_prod);
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d5ade16c70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.34/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
++++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
+@@ -190,11 +190,12 @@ static int b44_wait_bit(struct b44 *bp,
+ break;
+ udelay(10);
+ }
++#if 0
+ if (i == timeout) {
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ netdev_err(bp->dev, "BUG! Timeout waiting for bit %08x of register %lx to %s\n",
+ bit, reg, clear ? "clear" : "set");
+-
++#endif
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ return 0;
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.35/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.35/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d5ade16c70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-2.6.35/211-b44_timeout_spam.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
++++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
+@@ -190,11 +190,12 @@ static int b44_wait_bit(struct b44 *bp,
+ break;
+ udelay(10);
+ }
++#if 0
+ if (i == timeout) {
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ netdev_err(bp->dev, "BUG! Timeout waiting for bit %08x of register %lx to %s\n",
+ bit, reg, clear ? "clear" : "set");
+-
++#endif
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ return 0;