diff options
author | Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> | 2019-09-08 23:27:04 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> | 2019-09-10 21:54:58 +0200 |
commit | a0c84947043db72f9e1078b009ac039ed2246f2c (patch) | |
tree | 9606207b4e05e76fc1189484946b04506326fb2d | |
parent | d889cc988777f228ae928b33d2fd26681270c02b (diff) | |
download | upstream-a0c84947043db72f9e1078b009ac039ed2246f2c.tar.gz upstream-a0c84947043db72f9e1078b009ac039ed2246f2c.tar.bz2 upstream-a0c84947043db72f9e1078b009ac039ed2246f2c.zip |
hostapd: Fix security problem in EAP-pwd
This fixes:
CVE-2019-11555 "EAP-pwd message reassembly issue with unexpected fragment"
https://w1.fi/security/2019-5/eap-pwd-message-reassembly-issue-with-unexpected-fragment.txt
This should not affect OpenWrt in the default settings as we do not use
EAP-pwd.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
(cherry picked from commit 9f34bf51d60a237696b1d4cc9b5f4835b95e7ea2)
3 files changed, 81 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile b/package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile index d0866f670c..18e4ea4490 100644 --- a/package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile +++ b/package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk PKG_NAME:=hostapd -PKG_RELEASE:=7 +PKG_RELEASE:=8 PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://w1.fi/hostap.git PKG_SOURCE_PROTO:=git diff --git a/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/065-0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch b/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/065-0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b98e183244 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/065-0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +From fe76f487e28bdc61940f304f153a954cf36935ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> +Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:55:32 +0300 +Subject: [PATCH 1/3] EAP-pwd server: Fix reassembly buffer handling + +data->inbuf allocation might fail and if that were to happen, the next +fragment in the exchange could have resulted in NULL pointer +dereference. Unexpected fragment with more bit might also be able to +trigger this. Fix that by explicitly checking for data->inbuf to be +available before using it. + +Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> +--- + src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c | 8 +++++++- + 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +--- a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c ++++ b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c +@@ -947,6 +947,12 @@ static void eap_pwd_process(struct eap_s + * the first and all intermediate fragments have the M bit set + */ + if (EAP_PWD_GET_MORE_BIT(lm_exch) || data->in_frag_pos) { ++ if (!data->inbuf) { ++ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, ++ "EAP-pwd: No buffer for reassembly"); ++ eap_pwd_state(data, FAILURE); ++ return; ++ } + if ((data->in_frag_pos + len) > wpabuf_size(data->inbuf)) { + wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Buffer overflow " + "attack detected! (%d+%d > %d)", +@@ -967,7 +973,7 @@ static void eap_pwd_process(struct eap_s + * last fragment won't have the M bit set (but we're obviously + * buffering fragments so that's how we know it's the last) + */ +- if (data->in_frag_pos) { ++ if (data->in_frag_pos && data->inbuf) { + pos = wpabuf_head_u8(data->inbuf); + len = data->in_frag_pos; + wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Last fragment, %d bytes", diff --git a/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/065-0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch b/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/065-0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..cc80562586 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/network/services/hostapd/patches/065-0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +From d2d1a324ce937628e4d9d9999fe113819b7d4478 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> +Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:21:20 +0300 +Subject: [PATCH 3/3] EAP-pwd peer: Fix reassembly buffer handling + +Unexpected fragment might result in data->inbuf not being allocated +before processing and that could have resulted in NULL pointer +dereference. Fix that by explicitly checking for data->inbuf to be +available before using it. + +Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> +--- + src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c | 9 ++++++++- + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +--- a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c ++++ b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c +@@ -969,6 +969,13 @@ eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void + * buffer and ACK the fragment + */ + if (EAP_PWD_GET_MORE_BIT(lm_exch) || data->in_frag_pos) { ++ if (!data->inbuf) { ++ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, ++ "EAP-pwd: No buffer for reassembly"); ++ ret->methodState = METHOD_DONE; ++ ret->decision = DECISION_FAIL; ++ return NULL; ++ } + data->in_frag_pos += len; + if (data->in_frag_pos > wpabuf_size(data->inbuf)) { + wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, "EAP-pwd: Buffer overflow attack " +@@ -995,7 +1002,7 @@ eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void + /* + * we're buffering and this is the last fragment + */ +- if (data->in_frag_pos) { ++ if (data->in_frag_pos && data->inbuf) { + wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Last fragment, %d bytes", + (int) len); + pos = wpabuf_head_u8(data->inbuf); |