aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJames <>2015-11-04 11:49:21 +0000
committerJames <>2015-11-04 11:49:21 +0000
commit716ca530e1c4515d8683c9d5be3d56b301758b66 (patch)
tree700eb5bcc1a462a5f21dcec15ce7c97ecfefa772 /target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
downloadtrunk-47381-716ca530e1c4515d8683c9d5be3d56b301758b66.tar.gz
trunk-47381-716ca530e1c4515d8683c9d5be3d56b301758b66.tar.bz2
trunk-47381-716ca530e1c4515d8683c9d5be3d56b301758b66.zip
trunk-47381HEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch65
1 files changed, 65 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9f2cd39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
+Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall.
+Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on
+mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to
+do the same in bcma.
+Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM
+proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom.
+
+Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
+---
+While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and
+module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def
+tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if
+bcma_modinit_early failed.
+
+Do you see any better idea of solving this?
+---
+ drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
+ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
++++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
+@@ -637,13 +637,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev
+ core->id.rev, core->id.class);
+ }
+
++/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */
++static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void)
++{
++ return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
++}
++#ifndef MODULE
++fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early);
++#endif
++
++/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */
+ static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
+ {
+ int err;
+
+- err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type);
++#ifdef MODULE
++ err = bcma_modinit_early();
+ if (err)
+ return err;
++#endif
+
+ err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver();
+ if (err) {
+@@ -660,7 +672,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void)
+
+ return err;
+ }
+-fs_initcall(bcma_modinit);
++module_init(bcma_modinit);
+
+ static void __exit bcma_modexit(void)
+ {