blob: 11c65a49ed68fa0b74a3c67a9fa58d061fbf638f (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:25:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: testing the wrong variable in brcmf_rx_hdrpull()
Smatch complains about this code:
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c:335 brcmf_rx_hdrpull()
error: we previously assumed '*ifp' could be null (see line 333)
The problem is that we recently changed these from "ifp" to "*ifp" but
there was one that we didn't update.
- if (ret || !ifp || !ifp->ndev) {
+ if (ret || !(*ifp) || !(*ifp)->ndev) {
if (ret != -ENODATA && ifp)
^^^
- ifp->stats.rx_errors++;
+ (*ifp)->stats.rx_errors++;
I have updated it to *ifp as well. We always call this function is a
non-NULL "ifp" pointer, btw.
Fixes: c462ebcdfe42 ('brcmfmac: create common function for handling brcmf_proto_hdrpull()')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static int brcmf_rx_hdrpull(struct brcmf
ret = brcmf_proto_hdrpull(drvr, true, skb, ifp);
if (ret || !(*ifp) || !(*ifp)->ndev) {
- if (ret != -ENODATA && ifp)
+ if (ret != -ENODATA && *ifp)
(*ifp)->stats.rx_errors++;
brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb(skb);
return -ENODATA;
|
