aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/ichspi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>2017-04-21 23:47:08 +0200
committerNico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>2017-12-28 10:49:05 +0000
commited098d62d66d91cf7330a37f9b83e303eb7f56d8 (patch)
tree639b6233e588fd8b4150b42112da36e239ba7fa4 /ichspi.c
parent7e3c81ae7122120fe10d43fcba61a513e2461de9 (diff)
downloadflashrom-ed098d62d66d91cf7330a37f9b83e303eb7f56d8.tar.gz
flashrom-ed098d62d66d91cf7330a37f9b83e303eb7f56d8.tar.bz2
flashrom-ed098d62d66d91cf7330a37f9b83e303eb7f56d8.zip
spi: Move ICH BBAR quirk out of the way
Get rid of the layering violations around ICH's BBAR. Move all the weird address handling into (surprise, surprise) `ichspi.c`. Might fix writes for the `BBAR != 0` case by accident. Background: Some ICHs have a BBAR (BIOS Base Address Configuration Register) that, if set, limits the valid address range to [BBAR, 2^24). Current code lifted addresses for REMS, RES and READ operations by BBAR, now we do it for all addresses in ichspi. Special care has to be taken if the BBAR is not aligned by the flash chip's size. In this case, the lower part of the chip (from BBAR aligned down, up to BBAR) is inacces- sible (this seems to be the original intend behind BBAR) and has to be left out in the address offset calculation. Change-Id: Icbac513c5339e8aff624870252133284ef85ab73 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22396 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'ichspi.c')
-rw-r--r--ichspi.c39
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/ichspi.c b/ichspi.c
index c7bda920..5fe25f61 100644
--- a/ichspi.c
+++ b/ichspi.c
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
static int ichspi_lock = 0;
static enum ich_chipset ich_generation = CHIPSET_ICH_UNKNOWN;
-uint32_t ichspi_bbar = 0;
+static uint32_t ichspi_bbar;
static void *ich_spibar = NULL;
@@ -1150,19 +1150,6 @@ static int ich_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt,
return SPI_INVALID_LENGTH;
}
- /* if opcode-type requires an address */
- if (opcode->spi_type == SPI_OPCODE_TYPE_READ_WITH_ADDRESS ||
- opcode->spi_type == SPI_OPCODE_TYPE_WRITE_WITH_ADDRESS) {
- addr = (writearr[1] << 16) |
- (writearr[2] << 8) | (writearr[3] << 0);
- if (addr < ichspi_bbar) {
- msg_perr("%s: Address 0x%06x below allowed "
- "range 0x%06x-0xffffff\n", __func__,
- addr, ichspi_bbar);
- return SPI_INVALID_ADDRESS;
- }
- }
-
/* Translate read/write array/count.
* The maximum data length is identical for the maximum read length and
* for the maximum write length excluding opcode and address. Opcode and
@@ -1181,6 +1168,30 @@ static int ich_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int writecnt,
count = readcnt;
}
+ /* if opcode-type requires an address */
+ if (cmd == JEDEC_REMS || cmd == JEDEC_RES) {
+ addr = ichspi_bbar;
+ } else if (opcode->spi_type == SPI_OPCODE_TYPE_READ_WITH_ADDRESS ||
+ opcode->spi_type == SPI_OPCODE_TYPE_WRITE_WITH_ADDRESS) {
+ /* BBAR may cut part of the chip off at the lower end. */
+ const uint32_t valid_base = ichspi_bbar & ((flash->chip->total_size * 1024) - 1);
+ const uint32_t addr_offset = ichspi_bbar - valid_base;
+ /* Highest address we can program is (2^24 - 1). */
+ const uint32_t valid_end = (1 << 24) - addr_offset;
+
+ addr = writearr[1] << 16 | writearr[2] << 8 | writearr[3];
+ const uint32_t addr_end = addr + count;
+
+ if (addr < valid_base ||
+ addr_end < addr || /* integer overflow check */
+ addr_end > valid_end) {
+ msg_perr("%s: Addressed region 0x%06x-0x%06x not in allowed range 0x%06x-0x%06x\n",
+ __func__, addr, addr_end - 1, valid_base, valid_end - 1);
+ return SPI_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+ }
+ addr += addr_offset;
+ }
+
result = run_opcode(flash, *opcode, addr, count, data);
if (result) {
msg_pdbg("Running OPCODE 0x%02x failed ", opcode->opcode);