blob: 4cee29e8f5a014e1f5eab5ebdecc5ecb05537f76 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
|
All the mitmproxy projects strive to maintain 100% code coverage. In general,
patches and pull requests will be declined unless they're accompanied by a
suitable extension to the test suite.
Our tests are written for the [nose](https://nose.readthedocs.org/en/latest/).
At the point where you send your pull request, a command like this:
<pre class="terminal">
> nosetests --with-cov --cov-report term-missing ./test
</pre>
Should give output something like this:
<pre class="terminal">
> ---------- coverage: platform darwin, python 2.7.2-final-0 --
> Name Stmts Miss Cover Missing
> ----------------------------------------------------
> libmproxy/__init__ 0 0 100%
> libmproxy/app 4 0 100%
> libmproxy/cmdline 100 0 100%
> libmproxy/controller 69 0 100%
> libmproxy/dump 150 0 100%
> libmproxy/encoding 39 0 100%
> libmproxy/filt 201 0 100%
> libmproxy/flow 891 0 100%
> libmproxy/proxy 427 0 100%
> libmproxy/script 27 0 100%
> libmproxy/utils 133 0 100%
> libmproxy/version 4 0 100%
> ----------------------------------------------------
> TOTAL 2045 0 100%
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Ran 251 tests in 11.864s
</pre>
There are exceptions to the coverage requirement - for instance, much of the
console interface code can't sensibly be unit tested. These portions are
excluded from coverage analysis either in the **.coveragerc** file, or using
**#pragma no-cover** directives. To keep our coverage analysis relevant, we use
these measures as sparingly as possible.
|
