diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h | 118 |
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h index 4095f4d5..91ba1d9b 100644 --- a/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h +++ b/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h @@ -30,8 +30,7 @@ // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -// -// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) + // Implements class templates NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock. // @@ -51,10 +50,9 @@ // NiceMock<MockFoo>. // // NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock "inherit" the constructors of -// their respective base class, with up-to 10 arguments. Therefore -// you can write NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock -// where MockFoo has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), -// for example. +// their respective base class. Therefore you can write +// NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock where MockFoo +// has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), for example. // // A known limitation is that NiceMock<MockFoo>, NaggyMock<MockFoo>, // and StrictMock<MockFoo> only works for mock methods defined using @@ -63,10 +61,8 @@ // or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. // In particular, nesting NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock is NOT // supported. -// -// Another known limitation is that the constructors of the base mock -// cannot have arguments passed by non-const reference, which are -// banned by the Google C++ style guide anyway. + +// GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE #ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_ #define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_GENERATED_NICE_STRICT_H_ @@ -79,15 +75,35 @@ namespace testing { template <class MockClass> class NiceMock : public MockClass { public: - // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as - // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass. - NiceMock() { + NiceMock() : MockClass() { + ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } + +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using + // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing + // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected + // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. + + // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be + // made explicit. + template <typename A> + explicit NiceMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have - // to define it for each arity. + template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An> + NiceMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args) + : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2), + std::forward<An>(args)...) { + ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } +#else + // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one + // for each arity. template <typename A1> explicit NiceMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) { ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls( @@ -163,7 +179,9 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass { internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - virtual ~NiceMock() { +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + + ~NiceMock() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } @@ -175,15 +193,35 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass { template <class MockClass> class NaggyMock : public MockClass { public: - // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as - // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass. - NaggyMock() { + NaggyMock() : MockClass() { ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have - // to define it for each arity. +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using + // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing + // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected + // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. + + // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be + // made explicit. + template <typename A> + explicit NaggyMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { + ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } + + template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An> + NaggyMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args) + : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2), + std::forward<An>(args)...) { + ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } +#else + // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one + // for each arity. template <typename A1> explicit NaggyMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) { ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls( @@ -259,7 +297,9 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass { internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - virtual ~NaggyMock() { +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + + ~NaggyMock() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } @@ -271,15 +311,35 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass { template <class MockClass> class StrictMock : public MockClass { public: - // We don't factor out the constructor body to a common method, as - // we have to avoid a possible clash with members of MockClass. - StrictMock() { + StrictMock() : MockClass() { ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - // C++ doesn't (yet) allow inheritance of constructors, so we have - // to define it for each arity. +#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using + // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing + // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected + // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. + + // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be + // made explicit. + template <typename A> + explicit StrictMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { + ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } + + template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An> + StrictMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args) + : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2), + std::forward<An>(args)...) { + ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( + internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); + } +#else + // C++98 doesn't have variadic templates, so we have to define one + // for each arity. template <typename A1> explicit StrictMock(const A1& a1) : MockClass(a1) { ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls( @@ -355,7 +415,9 @@ class StrictMock : public MockClass { internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } - virtual ~StrictMock() { +#endif // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 + + ~StrictMock() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction( internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this)); } |