Initial import.

1 files changed, 755 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/gtest_output_test_.cc b/test/gtest_output_test_.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d9f3f9e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/gtest_output_test_.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,755 @@
+// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// A unit test for Google Test itself.  This verifies that the basic
+// constructs of Google Test work.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+#include <gtest/gtest-spi.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's
+// implementation.  It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is
+// included, or there will be a compiler error.  This trick is to
+// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in
+// his code.
+#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION
+#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
+#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#ifdef GTEST_OS_LINUX
+#include <string.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <string>
+#include <vector>
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_LINUX
+
+// Tests catching fatal failures.
+
+// A subroutine used by the following test.
+void TestEq1(int x) {
+  ASSERT_EQ(1, x);
+}
+
+// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
+// generates, and then returns early.
+void TryTestSubroutine() {
+  // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
+  TestEq1(2);
+
+  // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
+  //
+  // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
+  // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
+  if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
+
+  // If we get here, something is wrong.
+  FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
+}
+
+// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
+
+  TryTestSubroutine();
+}
+
+// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
+
+  // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
+  TryTestSubroutine();
+
+  // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
+  //
+  // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
+  // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
+  if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
+
+  // If we get here, something is wrong.
+  FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
+}
+
+// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(false);  // Generates a nonfatal failure
+  ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure());  // This should succeed.
+}
+
+// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
+TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
+  static const int a[4] = {
+    3, 9, 2, 6
+  };
+
+  printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
+  for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) {
+    printf("i == %d\n", i);
+    EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
+  }
+}
+
+// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
+
+// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
+void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+  ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
+}
+
+// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
+void SubWithTrace(int n) {
+  SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
+
+  SubWithoutTrace(n);
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
+  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+  // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
+  ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
+
+  {
+    SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
+    // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
+    // the trace.
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
+  }
+
+  // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
+  // should be no trace again.
+  ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
+  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+  for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
+    SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
+
+    SubWithoutTrace(i);
+  }
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
+  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+  SubWithTrace(1);
+  SubWithTrace(2);
+}
+
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
+  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+  SCOPED_TRACE("");  // A trace without a message.
+
+  SubWithTrace(2);
+}
+
+// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
+  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+
+  SCOPED_TRACE("A");
+  ADD_FAILURE()
+      << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
+
+  SCOPED_TRACE("B");
+  ADD_FAILURE()
+      << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
+
+  {
+    SCOPED_TRACE("C");
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
+                  << "trace point A, B, and C.";
+  }
+
+  SCOPED_TRACE("D");
+  ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
+                << "trace point A, B, and D.";
+}
+
+// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
+//
+// This function creates two failures intentionally.
+void AdHocTest() {
+  printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
+  EXPECT_TRUE(false);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
+}
+
+
+// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
+int RunAllTests() {
+  AdHocTest();
+  return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+}
+
+// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
+class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+    printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
+  }
+
+  ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+  }
+
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp().";
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
+  ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
+}
+
+// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
+class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+    printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+    Init();
+  }
+
+  ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+  }
+
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp().  "
+                  << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+                  << "had a fatal failure.";
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown().  "
+                  << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+                  << "had a fatal failure.";
+  }
+ private:
+  void Init() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
+  ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body.  "
+                << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+                << "had a fatal failure.";
+}
+
+// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
+class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
+    Deinit();
+  }
+
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown().";
+  }
+ private:
+  void Deinit() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
+  FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
+}
+
+// Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
+class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
+    Deinit();
+  }
+
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
+  }
+ private:
+  void Deinit() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
+  FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function.  "
+         << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
+}
+
+#ifdef GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+// This group of tests verifies that Google Test handles SEH and C++
+// exceptions correctly.
+
+// A function that throws an SEH exception.
+static void ThrowSEH() {
+  int* p = NULL;
+  *p = 0;  // Raises an access violation.
+}
+
+// Tests exceptions thrown in the test fixture constructor.
+class ExceptionInFixtureCtorTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  ExceptionInFixtureCtorTest() {
+    printf("(expecting a failure on thrown exception "
+           "in the test fixture's constructor)\n");
+
+    ThrowSEH();
+  }
+
+  virtual ~ExceptionInFixtureCtorTest() {
+    Deinit();
+  }
+
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp().  "
+           << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor threw.";
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown().  "
+           << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor threw.";
+  }
+ private:
+  void Deinit() {
+    FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the d'tor.  "
+           << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor threw.";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST_F(ExceptionInFixtureCtorTest, ExceptionInFixtureCtor) {
+  FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function.  "
+         << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor threw.";
+}
+
+// Tests exceptions thrown in SetUp().
+class ExceptionInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  virtual ~ExceptionInSetUpTest() {
+    Deinit();
+  }
+
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
+
+    ThrowSEH();
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
+  }
+ private:
+  void Deinit() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST_F(ExceptionInSetUpTest, ExceptionInSetUp) {
+  FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function.  "
+         << "We should never get here, as SetUp() threw.";
+}
+
+// Tests that TearDown() and the test fixture d'tor are always called,
+// even when the test function throws an exception.
+class ExceptionInTestFunctionTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  virtual ~ExceptionInTestFunctionTest() {
+    Deinit();
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
+  }
+ private:
+  void Deinit() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+  }
+};
+
+// Tests that the test fixture d'tor is always called, even when the
+// test function throws an SEH exception.
+TEST_F(ExceptionInTestFunctionTest, SEH) {
+  printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
+
+  ThrowSEH();
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that the test fixture d'tor is always called, even when the
+// test function throws a C++ exception.  We do this only when
+// GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS is non-zero, i.e. C++ exceptions are enabled.
+TEST_F(ExceptionInTestFunctionTest, CppException) {
+  throw 1;
+}
+
+// Tests exceptions thrown in TearDown().
+class ExceptionInTearDownTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  virtual ~ExceptionInTearDownTest() {
+    Deinit();
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    throw 1;
+  }
+ private:
+  void Deinit() {
+    FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+  }
+};
+
+TEST_F(ExceptionInTearDownTest, ExceptionInTearDown) {
+  printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
+// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
+// the same test case use.  It deliberately contains two fixture
+// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
+
+// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
+// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
+// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
+// fail.
+
+namespace foo {
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
+       TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
+
+}  // namespace foo
+
+namespace bar {
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+// The following two tests are expected to fail.  We rely on the
+// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
+
+class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
+       TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
+
+}  // namespace bar
+
+// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
+// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case.  The first
+// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
+// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
+
+class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
+
+// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
+
+class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
+};
+
+TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
+
+// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {
+}
+
+// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
+int global_integer = 0;
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
+  global_integer = 0;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+  }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
+// (static or not).
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
+  int m = 0;
+  static int n;
+  n = 1;
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+  }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
+// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+  }, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
+// non-fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+  }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
+// non-fatal failures.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
+  }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+  }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested returns.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+    return;
+  }, "");
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested throws.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  try {
+    EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+      throw 0;
+    }, "");
+  } catch(int) {  // NOLINT
+  }
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
+  global_integer = 0;
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+    ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure.";
+  }, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
+// variables.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
+  static int n;
+  n = 1;
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+    ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure.";
+  }, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
+// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+    FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+  }, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+  }, "");
+}
+
+// A helper for generating a fatal failure.
+void FatalFailure() {
+  FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
+// fatal failures.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+    FatalFailure();
+    FatalFailure();
+  }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+  }, "");
+}
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested returns.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+    return;
+  }, "");
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested throws.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
+  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+  try {
+    EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+      throw 0;
+    }, "");
+  } catch(int) {  // NOLINT
+  }
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
+
+class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
+ public:
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
+    FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+  }
+};
+
+class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
+ public:
+  virtual void SetUp() {
+    printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
+  }
+
+  virtual void TearDown() {
+    printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
+    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+  }
+};
+
+// The main function.
+//
+// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
+// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
+// with the "golden" file.
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+  // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
+  // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
+  // this program with the golden file.
+  testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
+
+#ifdef GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+  if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
+    // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
+    // process of an threadsafe-style death test.
+    freopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
+    return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+  }
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+  // Registers two global test environments.
+  // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
+  // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
+  testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
+  testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
+
+  return RunAllTests();
+}