Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/google/googletest

19 files changed, 1921 insertions, 1011 deletions

diff --git a/googlemock/test/BUILD.bazel b/googlemock/test/BUILD.bazel
index 0fe72a67..95a6c269 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/BUILD.bazel
+++ b/googlemock/test/BUILD.bazel
@@ -34,28 +34,19 @@
 
 licenses(["notice"])
 
-""" gmock own tests """
-
+# Tests for GMock itself
 cc_test(
     name = "gmock_all_test",
     size = "small",
-    srcs = glob(
-        include = [
-            "gmock-*.cc",
-        ],
-    ),
+    srcs = glob(include = ["gmock-*.cc"]),
     linkopts = select({
         "//:windows": [],
-        "//:windows_msvc": [],
-        "//conditions:default": [
-            "-pthread",
-        ],
+        "//conditions:default": ["-pthread"],
     }),
     deps = ["//:gtest"],
 )
 
-#  Py tests
-
+# Python tests
 py_library(
     name = "gmock_test_utils",
     testonly = 1,
@@ -66,9 +57,7 @@ cc_binary(
     name = "gmock_leak_test_",
     testonly = 1,
     srcs = ["gmock_leak_test_.cc"],
-    deps = [
-        "//:gtest_main",
-    ],
+    deps = ["//:gtest_main"],
 )
 
 py_test(
@@ -89,17 +78,13 @@ cc_test(
         "gmock_link_test.cc",
         "gmock_link_test.h",
     ],
-    deps = [
-        "//:gtest_main",
-    ],
+    deps = ["//:gtest_main"],
 )
 
 cc_binary(
     name = "gmock_output_test_",
     srcs = ["gmock_output_test_.cc"],
-    deps = [
-        "//:gtest",
-    ],
+    deps = ["//:gtest"],
 )
 
 py_test(
@@ -117,7 +102,5 @@ cc_test(
     name = "gmock_test",
     size = "small",
     srcs = ["gmock_test.cc"],
-    deps = [
-        "//:gtest_main",
-    ],
+    deps = ["//:gtest_main"],
 )
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
index 7db5d3cb..f27d55aa 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-actions_test.cc
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@
 // This file tests the built-in actions.
 
 // Silence C4800 (C4800: 'int *const ': forcing value
-// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 14,15
+// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 15
 #ifdef _MSC_VER
-#if _MSC_VER <= 1900
+#if _MSC_VER == 1900
 #  pragma warning(push)
 #  pragma warning(disable:4800)
 #endif
@@ -74,14 +74,11 @@ using testing::ReturnRefOfCopy;
 using testing::SetArgPointee;
 using testing::SetArgumentPointee;
 using testing::Unused;
+using testing::WithArgs;
 using testing::_;
-using testing::get;
 using testing::internal::BuiltInDefaultValue;
 using testing::internal::Int64;
 using testing::internal::UInt64;
-using testing::make_tuple;
-using testing::tuple;
-using testing::tuple_element;
 
 #if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 using testing::SetErrnoAndReturn;
@@ -223,7 +220,6 @@ class MyNonDefaultConstructible {
   int value_;
 };
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, ExistsForDefaultConstructibleType) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(BuiltInDefaultValue<MyDefaultConstructible>::Exists());
@@ -233,7 +229,6 @@ TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, IsDefaultConstructedForDefaultConstructibleType) {
   EXPECT_EQ(42, BuiltInDefaultValue<MyDefaultConstructible>::Get().value());
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 TEST(BuiltInDefaultValueTest, DoesNotExistForNonDefaultConstructibleType) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(BuiltInDefaultValue<MyNonDefaultConstructible>::Exists());
@@ -303,7 +298,6 @@ TEST(DefaultValueDeathTest, GetReturnsBuiltInDefaultValueWhenUnset) {
   }, "");
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
 TEST(DefaultValueTest, GetWorksForMoveOnlyIfSet) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<std::unique_ptr<int>>::Exists());
   EXPECT_TRUE(DefaultValue<std::unique_ptr<int>>::Get() == nullptr);
@@ -314,7 +308,6 @@ TEST(DefaultValueTest, GetWorksForMoveOnlyIfSet) {
   std::unique_ptr<int> i = DefaultValue<std::unique_ptr<int>>::Get();
   EXPECT_EQ(42, *i);
 }
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
 
 // Tests that DefaultValue<void>::Get() returns void.
 TEST(DefaultValueTest, GetWorksForVoid) {
@@ -382,8 +375,8 @@ typedef int MyGlobalFunction(bool, int);
 
 class MyActionImpl : public ActionInterface<MyGlobalFunction> {
  public:
-  virtual int Perform(const tuple<bool, int>& args) {
-    return get<0>(args) ? get<1>(args) : 0;
+  int Perform(const std::tuple<bool, int>& args) override {
+    return std::get<0>(args) ? std::get<1>(args) : 0;
   }
 };
 
@@ -399,8 +392,8 @@ TEST(ActionInterfaceTest, MakeAction) {
   // it a tuple whose size and type are compatible with F's argument
   // types.  For example, if F is int(), then Perform() takes a
   // 0-tuple; if F is void(bool, int), then Perform() takes a
-  // tuple<bool, int>, and so on.
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, action.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  // std::tuple<bool, int>, and so on.
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5)));
 }
 
 // Tests that Action<F> can be contructed from a pointer to
@@ -413,8 +406,8 @@ TEST(ActionTest, CanBeConstructedFromActionInterface) {
 TEST(ActionTest, DelegatesWorkToActionInterface) {
   const Action<MyGlobalFunction> action(new MyActionImpl);
 
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, action.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, action.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 1)));
 }
 
 // Tests that Action<F> can be copied.
@@ -423,22 +416,22 @@ TEST(ActionTest, IsCopyable) {
   Action<MyGlobalFunction> a2(a1);  // Tests the copy constructor.
 
   // a1 should continue to work after being copied from.
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 1)));
 
   // a2 should work like the action it was copied from.
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 1)));
 
   a2 = a1;  // Tests the assignment operator.
 
   // a1 should continue to work after being copied from.
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 1)));
 
   // a2 should work like the action it was copied from.
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 1)));
 }
 
 // Tests that an Action<From> object can be converted to a
@@ -446,8 +439,8 @@ TEST(ActionTest, IsCopyable) {
 
 class IsNotZero : public ActionInterface<bool(int)> {  // NOLINT
  public:
-  virtual bool Perform(const tuple<int>& arg) {
-    return get<0>(arg) != 0;
+  bool Perform(const std::tuple<int>& arg) override {
+    return std::get<0>(arg) != 0;
   }
 };
 
@@ -460,8 +453,8 @@ class IsNotZero : public ActionInterface<bool(int)> {  // NOLINT
 TEST(ActionTest, CanBeConvertedToOtherActionType) {
   const Action<bool(int)> a1(new IsNotZero);  // NOLINT
   const Action<int(char)> a2 = Action<int(char)>(a1);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a2.Perform(make_tuple('a')));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple('\0')));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple('a')));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple('\0')));
 }
 #endif  // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN
 
@@ -475,7 +468,9 @@ class ReturnSecondArgumentAction {
   // polymorphic action whose Perform() method template is either
   // const or not.  This lets us verify the non-const case.
   template <typename Result, typename ArgumentTuple>
-  Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) { return get<1>(args); }
+  Result Perform(const ArgumentTuple& args) {
+    return std::get<1>(args);
+  }
 };
 
 // Implements a polymorphic action that can be used in a nullary
@@ -490,7 +485,9 @@ class ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunctionAction {
   // polymorphic action whose Perform() method template is either
   // const or not.  This lets us verify the const case.
   template <typename Result>
-  Result Perform(const tuple<>&) const { return 0; }
+  Result Perform(const std::tuple<>&) const {
+    return 0;
+  }
 };
 
 // These functions verify that MakePolymorphicAction() returns a
@@ -509,42 +506,42 @@ ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunction() {
 // implementation class into a polymorphic action.
 TEST(MakePolymorphicActionTest, ConstructsActionFromImpl) {
   Action<int(bool, int, double)> a1 = ReturnSecondArgument();  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5, 2.0)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 5, 2.0)));
 }
 
 // Tests that MakePolymorphicAction() works when the implementation
 // class' Perform() method template has only one template parameter.
 TEST(MakePolymorphicActionTest, WorksWhenPerformHasOneTemplateParameter) {
   Action<int()> a1 = ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunction();
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   Action<void*()> a2 = ReturnZeroFromNullaryFunction();
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(make_tuple()) == nullptr);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(std::make_tuple()) == nullptr);
 }
 
 // Tests that Return() works as an action for void-returning
 // functions.
 TEST(ReturnTest, WorksForVoid) {
   const Action<void(int)> ret = Return();  // NOLINT
-  return ret.Perform(make_tuple(1));
+  return ret.Perform(std::make_tuple(1));
 }
 
 // Tests that Return(v) returns v.
 TEST(ReturnTest, ReturnsGivenValue) {
   Action<int()> ret = Return(1);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   ret = Return(-5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(-5, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(-5, ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests that Return("string literal") works.
 TEST(ReturnTest, AcceptsStringLiteral) {
   Action<const char*()> a1 = Return("Hello");
-  EXPECT_STREQ("Hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("Hello", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   Action<std::string()> a2 = Return("world");
-  EXPECT_EQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ("world", a2.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Test struct which wraps a vector of integers. Used in
@@ -563,7 +560,7 @@ TEST(ReturnTest, SupportsWrapperReturnType) {
   // Return() called with 'v' as argument. The Action will return the same data
   // as 'v' (copy) but it will be wrapped in an IntegerVectorWrapper.
   Action<IntegerVectorWrapper()> a = Return(v);
-  const std::vector<int>& result = *(a.Perform(make_tuple()).v);
+  const std::vector<int>& result = *(a.Perform(std::make_tuple()).v);
   EXPECT_THAT(result, ::testing::ElementsAre(0, 1, 2, 3, 4));
 }
 
@@ -581,10 +578,10 @@ TEST(ReturnTest, IsCovariant) {
   Base base;
   Derived derived;
   Action<Base*()> ret = Return(&base);
-  EXPECT_EQ(&base, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&base, ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   ret = Return(&derived);
-  EXPECT_EQ(&derived, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&derived, ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests that the type of the value passed into Return is converted into T
@@ -615,7 +612,7 @@ TEST(ReturnTest, ConvertsArgumentWhenConverted) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(converted) << "Return must convert its argument in its own "
                          << "conversion operator.";
   converted = false;
-  action.Perform(tuple<>());
+  action.Perform(std::tuple<>());
   EXPECT_FALSE(converted) << "Action must NOT convert its argument "
                           << "when performed.";
 }
@@ -636,30 +633,28 @@ TEST(ReturnTest, CanConvertArgumentUsingNonConstTypeCastOperator) {
 // Tests that ReturnNull() returns NULL in a pointer-returning function.
 TEST(ReturnNullTest, WorksInPointerReturningFunction) {
   const Action<int*()> a1 = ReturnNull();
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a1.Perform(make_tuple()) == nullptr);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()) == nullptr);
 
   const Action<const char*(bool)> a2 = ReturnNull();  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(make_tuple(true)) == nullptr);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(true)) == nullptr);
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
 // Tests that ReturnNull() returns NULL for shared_ptr and unique_ptr returning
 // functions.
 TEST(ReturnNullTest, WorksInSmartPointerReturningFunction) {
   const Action<std::unique_ptr<const int>()> a1 = ReturnNull();
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a1.Perform(make_tuple()) == nullptr);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()) == nullptr);
 
   const Action<std::shared_ptr<int>(std::string)> a2 = ReturnNull();
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(make_tuple("foo")) == nullptr);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a2.Perform(std::make_tuple("foo")) == nullptr);
 }
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
 
 // Tests that ReturnRef(v) works for reference types.
 TEST(ReturnRefTest, WorksForReference) {
   const int n = 0;
   const Action<const int&(bool)> ret = ReturnRef(n);  // NOLINT
 
-  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &ret.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &ret.Perform(std::make_tuple(true)));
 }
 
 // Tests that ReturnRef(v) is covariant.
@@ -667,10 +662,10 @@ TEST(ReturnRefTest, IsCovariant) {
   Base base;
   Derived derived;
   Action<Base&()> a = ReturnRef(base);
-  EXPECT_EQ(&base, &a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&base, &a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   a = ReturnRef(derived);
-  EXPECT_EQ(&derived, &a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&derived, &a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests that ReturnRefOfCopy(v) works for reference types.
@@ -678,12 +673,12 @@ TEST(ReturnRefOfCopyTest, WorksForReference) {
   int n = 42;
   const Action<const int&()> ret = ReturnRefOfCopy(n);
 
-  EXPECT_NE(&n, &ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(42, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_NE(&n, &ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   n = 43;
-  EXPECT_NE(&n, &ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(42, ret.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_NE(&n, &ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, ret.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests that ReturnRefOfCopy(v) is covariant.
@@ -691,10 +686,10 @@ TEST(ReturnRefOfCopyTest, IsCovariant) {
   Base base;
   Derived derived;
   Action<Base&()> a = ReturnRefOfCopy(base);
-  EXPECT_NE(&base, &a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_NE(&base, &a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   a = ReturnRefOfCopy(derived);
-  EXPECT_NE(&derived, &a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_NE(&derived, &a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests that DoDefault() does the default action for the mock method.
@@ -705,14 +700,12 @@ class MockClass {
 
   MOCK_METHOD1(IntFunc, int(bool flag));  // NOLINT
   MOCK_METHOD0(Foo, MyNonDefaultConstructible());
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
   MOCK_METHOD0(MakeUnique, std::unique_ptr<int>());
   MOCK_METHOD0(MakeUniqueBase, std::unique_ptr<Base>());
   MOCK_METHOD0(MakeVectorUnique, std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>>());
   MOCK_METHOD1(TakeUnique, int(std::unique_ptr<int>));
   MOCK_METHOD2(TakeUnique,
                int(const std::unique_ptr<int>&, std::unique_ptr<int>));
-#endif
 
  private:
   GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockClass);
@@ -800,14 +793,14 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointee) {
 
   int n = 0;
   char ch = '\0';
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch);
 
   a = SetArgPointee<2>('a');
   n = 0;
   ch = '\0';
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
 }
@@ -820,13 +813,13 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsStringLiteral) {
   Action<MyFunction> a = SetArgPointee<0>("hi");
   std::string str;
   const char* ptr = nullptr;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(&str, &ptr));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&str, &ptr));
   EXPECT_EQ("hi", str);
   EXPECT_TRUE(ptr == nullptr);
 
   a = SetArgPointee<1>("world");
   str = "";
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(&str, &ptr));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&str, &ptr));
   EXPECT_EQ("", str);
   EXPECT_STREQ("world", ptr);
 }
@@ -835,7 +828,7 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsWideStringLiteral) {
   typedef void MyFunction(const wchar_t**);
   Action<MyFunction> a = SetArgPointee<0>(L"world");
   const wchar_t* ptr = nullptr;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(&ptr));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ptr));
   EXPECT_STREQ(L"world", ptr);
 
 # if GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING
@@ -843,7 +836,7 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsWideStringLiteral) {
   typedef void MyStringFunction(std::wstring*);
   Action<MyStringFunction> a2 = SetArgPointee<0>(L"world");
   std::wstring str = L"";
-  a2.Perform(make_tuple(&str));
+  a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(&str));
   EXPECT_EQ(L"world", str);
 
 # endif
@@ -857,7 +850,7 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsCharPointer) {
   Action<MyFunction> a = SetArgPointee<1>(hi);
   std::string str;
   const char* ptr = nullptr;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &str, &ptr));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &str, &ptr));
   EXPECT_EQ("hi", str);
   EXPECT_TRUE(ptr == nullptr);
 
@@ -865,7 +858,7 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsCharPointer) {
   char* const world = world_array;
   a = SetArgPointee<2>(world);
   str = "";
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &str, &ptr));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &str, &ptr));
   EXPECT_EQ("", str);
   EXPECT_EQ(world, ptr);
 }
@@ -875,7 +868,7 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsWideCharPointer) {
   const wchar_t* const hi = L"hi";
   Action<MyFunction> a = SetArgPointee<1>(hi);
   const wchar_t* ptr = nullptr;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &ptr));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &ptr));
   EXPECT_EQ(hi, ptr);
 
 # if GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING
@@ -885,7 +878,7 @@ TEST(SetArgPointeeTest, AcceptsWideCharPointer) {
   wchar_t* const world = world_array;
   Action<MyStringFunction> a2 = SetArgPointee<1>(world);
   std::wstring str;
-  a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, &str));
+  a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &str));
   EXPECT_EQ(world_array, str);
 # endif
 }
@@ -898,14 +891,14 @@ TEST(SetArgumentPointeeTest, SetsTheNthPointee) {
 
   int n = 0;
   char ch = '\0';
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('\0', ch);
 
   a = SetArgumentPointee<2>('a');
   n = 0;
   ch = '\0';
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &n, &ch));
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
 }
@@ -926,6 +919,21 @@ class VoidNullaryFunctor {
   void operator()() { g_done = true; }
 };
 
+short Short(short n) { return n; }  // NOLINT
+char Char(char ch) { return ch; }
+
+const char* CharPtr(const char* s) { return s; }
+
+bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; }
+
+const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; }
+
+int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; }  // NOLINT
+
+int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; }
+
 class Foo {
  public:
   Foo() : value_(123) {}
@@ -940,16 +948,16 @@ class Foo {
 TEST(InvokeWithoutArgsTest, Function) {
   // As an action that takes one argument.
   Action<int(int)> a = InvokeWithoutArgs(Nullary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(2)));
 
   // As an action that takes two arguments.
   Action<int(int, double)> a2 = InvokeWithoutArgs(Nullary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a2.Perform(make_tuple(2, 3.5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(2, 3.5)));
 
   // As an action that returns void.
   Action<void(int)> a3 = InvokeWithoutArgs(VoidNullary);  // NOLINT
   g_done = false;
-  a3.Perform(make_tuple(1));
+  a3.Perform(std::make_tuple(1));
   EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
 }
 
@@ -957,17 +965,17 @@ TEST(InvokeWithoutArgsTest, Function) {
 TEST(InvokeWithoutArgsTest, Functor) {
   // As an action that takes no argument.
   Action<int()> a = InvokeWithoutArgs(NullaryFunctor());  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   // As an action that takes three arguments.
   Action<int(int, double, char)> a2 =  // NOLINT
       InvokeWithoutArgs(NullaryFunctor());
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, a2.Perform(make_tuple(3, 3.5, 'a')));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(3, 3.5, 'a')));
 
   // As an action that returns void.
   Action<void()> a3 = InvokeWithoutArgs(VoidNullaryFunctor());
   g_done = false;
-  a3.Perform(make_tuple());
+  a3.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
 }
 
@@ -976,13 +984,13 @@ TEST(InvokeWithoutArgsTest, Method) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<int(bool, char)> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeWithoutArgs(&foo, &Foo::Nullary);
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(true, 'a')));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 'a')));
 }
 
 // Tests using IgnoreResult() on a polymorphic action.
 TEST(IgnoreResultTest, PolymorphicAction) {
   Action<void(int)> a = IgnoreResult(Return(5));  // NOLINT
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(1));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1));
 }
 
 // Tests using IgnoreResult() on a monomorphic action.
@@ -995,7 +1003,7 @@ int ReturnOne() {
 TEST(IgnoreResultTest, MonomorphicAction) {
   g_done = false;
   Action<void()> a = IgnoreResult(Invoke(ReturnOne));
-  a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
 }
 
@@ -1010,55 +1018,155 @@ TEST(IgnoreResultTest, ActionReturningClass) {
   g_done = false;
   Action<void(int)> a =
       IgnoreResult(Invoke(ReturnMyNonDefaultConstructible));  // NOLINT
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(2));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(2));
   EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
 }
 
 TEST(AssignTest, Int) {
   int x = 0;
   Action<void(int)> a = Assign(&x, 5);
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(0));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(0));
   EXPECT_EQ(5, x);
 }
 
 TEST(AssignTest, String) {
   ::std::string x;
   Action<void(void)> a = Assign(&x, "Hello, world");
-  a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ("Hello, world", x);
 }
 
 TEST(AssignTest, CompatibleTypes) {
   double x = 0;
   Action<void(int)> a = Assign(&x, 5);
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(0));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(0));
   EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, x);
 }
 
+
+// Tests using WithArgs and with an action that takes 1 argument.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, OneArg) {
+  Action<bool(double x, int n)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 2 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TwoArgs) {
+  Action<const char*(const char* s, double x, short n)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 2>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr(s), 0.5, Short(2))));
+}
+
+struct ConcatAll {
+  std::string operator()() const { return {}; }
+  template <typename... I>
+  std::string operator()(const char* a, I... i) const {
+    return a + ConcatAll()(i...);
+  }
+};
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) {
+  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(ConcatAll{}));
+  EXPECT_EQ("0123210123",
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
+                                      CharPtr("3"))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that is not Invoke().
+class SubtractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> {
+ public:
+  int Perform(const std::tuple<int, int>& args) override {
+    return std::get<0>(args) - std::get<1>(args);
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) {
+  Action<int(const std::string&, int, int)> a =
+      WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubtractAction));
+  std::tuple<std::string, int, int> dummy =
+      std::make_tuple(std::string("hi"), 2, 10);
+  EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(dummy));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, Identity) {
+  Action<int(int x, char y, short z)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(100, Char(20), Short(3))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with repeated arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, RepeatedArguments) {
+  Action<int(bool, int m, int n)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 1, 1, 1>(Invoke(SumOf4));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 1, 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with reversed argument order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ReversedArgumentOrder) {
+  Action<const char*(short n, const char* input)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 0>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(Short(2), CharPtr(s))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with compatible, but not identical, argument types.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ArgsOfCompatibleTypes) {
+  Action<long(short x, char y, double z, char c)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123,
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(Short(100), Char(20), 5.6, Char(3))));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that returns void.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, VoidAction) {
+  Action<void(double x, char c, int n)> a = WithArgs<2, 1>(Invoke(VoidBinary));
+  g_done = false;
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1.5, 'a', 3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ReturnReference) {
+  Action<int&(int&, void*)> aa = WithArgs<0>([](int& a) -> int& { return a; });
+  int i = 0;
+  const int& res = aa.Perform(std::forward_as_tuple(i, nullptr));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&i, &res);
+}
+
+TEST(WithArgsTest, InnerActionWithConversion) {
+  Action<Derived*()> inner = [] { return nullptr; };
+  Action<Base*(double)> a = testing::WithoutArgs(inner);
+  EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1.1)));
+}
+
 #if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 
 class SetErrnoAndReturnTest : public testing::Test {
  protected:
-  virtual void SetUp() { errno = 0; }
-  virtual void TearDown() { errno = 0; }
+  void SetUp() override { errno = 0; }
+  void TearDown() override { errno = 0; }
 };
 
 TEST_F(SetErrnoAndReturnTest, Int) {
   Action<int(void)> a = SetErrnoAndReturn(ENOTTY, -5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(-5, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(-5, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
   EXPECT_EQ(ENOTTY, errno);
 }
 
 TEST_F(SetErrnoAndReturnTest, Ptr) {
   int x;
   Action<int*(void)> a = SetErrnoAndReturn(ENOTTY, &x);
-  EXPECT_EQ(&x, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&x, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
   EXPECT_EQ(ENOTTY, errno);
 }
 
 TEST_F(SetErrnoAndReturnTest, CompatibleTypes) {
   Action<double()> a = SetErrnoAndReturn(EINVAL, 5);
-  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5.0, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5.0, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
   EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
 }
 
@@ -1149,7 +1257,6 @@ TEST(ByRefTest, PrintsCorrectly) {
   EXPECT_EQ(expected.str(), actual.str());
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
 
 std::unique_ptr<int> UniquePtrSource() {
   return std::unique_ptr<int>(new int(19));
@@ -1262,9 +1369,7 @@ TEST(MockMethodTest, CanTakeMoveOnlyValue) {
   EXPECT_EQ(42, *saved);
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 // Tests for std::function based action.
 
 int Add(int val, int& ref, int* ptr) {  // NOLINT
@@ -1298,47 +1403,47 @@ TEST(FunctorActionTest, ActionFromFunction) {
 
 TEST(FunctorActionTest, ActionFromLambda) {
   Action<int(bool, int)> a1 = [](bool b, int i) { return b ? i : 0; };
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 5)));
 
   std::unique_ptr<int> saved;
   Action<void(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a2 = [&saved](std::unique_ptr<int> p) {
     saved = std::move(p);
   };
-  a2.Perform(make_tuple(UniqueInt(5)));
+  a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(UniqueInt(5)));
   EXPECT_EQ(5, *saved);
 }
 
 TEST(FunctorActionTest, PolymorphicFunctor) {
   Action<int(int)> ai = Double();
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, ai.Perform(make_tuple(1)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, ai.Perform(std::make_tuple(1)));
   Action<double(double)> ad = Double();  // Double? Double double!
-  EXPECT_EQ(3.0, ad.Perform(make_tuple(1.5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3.0, ad.Perform(std::make_tuple(1.5)));
 }
 
 TEST(FunctorActionTest, TypeConversion) {
   // Numeric promotions are allowed.
   const Action<bool(int)> a1 = [](int i) { return i > 1; };
   const Action<int(bool)> a2 = Action<int(bool)>(a1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(42)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(make_tuple(42)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(42)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(42)));
 
   // Implicit constructors are allowed.
   const Action<bool(std::string)> s1 = [](std::string s) { return !s.empty(); };
   const Action<int(const char*)> s2 = Action<int(const char*)>(s1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, s2.Perform(make_tuple("")));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, s2.Perform(make_tuple("hello")));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, s2.Perform(std::make_tuple("")));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, s2.Perform(std::make_tuple("hello")));
 
   // Also between the lambda and the action itself.
   const Action<bool(std::string)> x = [](Unused) { return 42; };
-  EXPECT_TRUE(x.Perform(make_tuple("hello")));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(x.Perform(std::make_tuple("hello")));
 }
 
 TEST(FunctorActionTest, UnusedArguments) {
   // Verify that users can ignore uninteresting arguments.
   Action<int(int, double y, double z)> a =
       [](int i, Unused, Unused) { return 2 * i; };
-  tuple<int, double, double> dummy = make_tuple(3, 7.3, 9.44);
+  std::tuple<int, double, double> dummy = std::make_tuple(3, 7.3, 9.44);
   EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(dummy));
 }
 
@@ -1349,18 +1454,17 @@ TEST(FunctorActionTest, UnusedArguments) {
 // so maybe it's better to make users use lambdas instead.
 TEST(MoveOnlyArgumentsTest, ReturningActions) {
   Action<int(std::unique_ptr<int>)> a = Return(1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(nullptr)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(nullptr)));
 
   a = testing::WithoutArgs([]() { return 7; });
-  EXPECT_EQ(7, a.Perform(make_tuple(nullptr)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(7, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(nullptr)));
 
   Action<void(std::unique_ptr<int>, int*)> a2 = testing::SetArgPointee<1>(3);
   int x = 0;
-  a2.Perform(make_tuple(nullptr, &x));
+  a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(nullptr, &x));
   EXPECT_EQ(x, 3);
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 }  // Unnamed namespace
 
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc
index 132591bc..60fd06a3 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-cardinalities_test.cc
@@ -396,17 +396,17 @@ TEST(ExactlyTest, HasCorrectBounds) {
 class EvenCardinality : public CardinalityInterface {
  public:
   // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality.
-  virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const {
+  bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const override {
     return (call_count % 2 == 0);
   }
 
   // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality.
-  virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int /* call_count */) const {
+  bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int /* call_count */) const override {
     return false;
   }
 
   // Describes self to an ostream.
-  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* ss) const {
+  void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* ss) const override {
     *ss << "called even number of times";
   }
 };
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_nc.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_nc.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d38fe85e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_nc.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+#include "gmock/gmock.h"
+
+#include <memory>
+#include <string>
+
+#if defined(TEST_MOCK_METHOD_INVALID_CONST_SPEC)
+
+struct Base {
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, F, (), (onst));
+};
+
+#else
+
+// Sanity check - this should compile.
+
+#endif
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_nc_test.py b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_nc_test.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8ef6e09f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_nc_test.py
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+"""Negative compilation tests for Google Mock macro MOCK_METHOD."""
+
+import os
+import sys
+
+IS_LINUX = os.name == "posix" and os.uname()[0] == "Linux"
+if not IS_LINUX:
+  sys.stderr.write(
+      "WARNING: Negative compilation tests are not supported on this platform")
+  sys.exit(0)
+
+# Suppresses the 'Import not at the top of the file' lint complaint.
+# pylint: disable-msg=C6204
+from google3.testing.pybase import fake_target_util
+from google3.testing.pybase import googletest
+
+# pylint: enable-msg=C6204
+
+
+class GMockMethodNCTest(googletest.TestCase):
+  """Negative compilation tests for MOCK_METHOD."""
+
+  # The class body is intentionally empty.  The actual test*() methods
+  # will be defined at run time by a call to
+  # DefineNegativeCompilationTests() later.
+  pass
+
+
+# Defines a list of test specs, where each element is a tuple
+# (test name, list of regexes for matching the compiler errors).
+TEST_SPECS = [
+    ("MOCK_METHOD_INVALID_CONST_SPEC",
+     [r"onst cannot be recognized as a valid specification modifier"]),
+]
+
+# Define a test method in GMockNCTest for each element in TEST_SPECS.
+fake_target_util.DefineNegativeCompilationTests(
+    GMockMethodNCTest,
+    "google3/third_party/googletest/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_nc",
+    "gmock-function-mocker_nc.o", TEST_SPECS)
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+  googletest.main()
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..294b21d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-function-mocker_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,657 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the function mocker classes.
+#include "gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h"
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+// MSDN says the header file to be included for STDMETHOD is BaseTyps.h but
+// we are getting compiler errors if we use basetyps.h, hence including
+// objbase.h for definition of STDMETHOD.
+# include <objbase.h>
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+#include <map>
+#include <string>
+#include "gmock/gmock.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+// There is a bug in MSVC (fixed in VS 2008) that prevents creating a
+// mock for a function with const arguments, so we don't test such
+// cases for MSVC versions older than 2008.
+#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
+# define GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+#endif  // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace gmock_function_mocker_test {
+
+using testing::_;
+using testing::A;
+using testing::An;
+using testing::AnyNumber;
+using testing::Const;
+using testing::DoDefault;
+using testing::Eq;
+using testing::Lt;
+using testing::MockFunction;
+using testing::Ref;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::ReturnRef;
+using testing::TypedEq;
+
+class FooInterface {
+ public:
+  virtual ~FooInterface() {}
+
+  virtual void VoidReturning(int x) = 0;
+
+  virtual int Nullary() = 0;
+  virtual bool Unary(int x) = 0;
+  virtual long Binary(short x, int y) = 0;  // NOLINT
+  virtual int Decimal(bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f,  // NOLINT
+                      float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j,
+                      const std::string& k) = 0;
+
+  virtual bool TakesNonConstReference(int& n) = 0;  // NOLINT
+  virtual std::string TakesConstReference(const int& n) = 0;
+#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+  virtual bool TakesConst(const int x) = 0;
+#endif  // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+
+  virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber() = 0;
+  virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(int n) = 0;
+
+  virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentType(int n) = 0;
+  virtual char OverloadedOnArgumentType(char c) = 0;
+
+  virtual int OverloadedOnConstness() = 0;
+  virtual char OverloadedOnConstness() const = 0;
+
+  virtual int TypeWithHole(int (*func)()) = 0;
+  virtual int TypeWithComma(const std::map<int, std::string>& a_map) = 0;
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  STDMETHOD_(int, CTNullary)() = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(bool, CTUnary)(int x) = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(int, CTDecimal)
+  (bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f,  // NOLINT
+   float g, double h, unsigned i, char* j, const std::string& k) = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(char, CTConst)(int x) const = 0;
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+};
+
+// Const qualifiers on arguments were once (incorrectly) considered
+// significant in determining whether two virtual functions had the same
+// signature. This was fixed in Visual Studio 2008. However, the compiler
+// still emits a warning that alerts about this change in behavior.
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(push)
+# pragma warning(disable : 4373)
+#endif
+class MockFoo : public FooInterface {
+ public:
+  MockFoo() {}
+
+  // Makes sure that a mock function parameter can be named.
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, VoidReturning, (int n));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, Nullary, ());  // NOLINT
+
+  // Makes sure that a mock function parameter can be unnamed.
+  MOCK_METHOD(bool, Unary, (int));          // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD(long, Binary, (short, int));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, Decimal,
+              (bool, char, short, int, long, float,  // NOLINT
+               double, unsigned, char*, const std::string& str),
+              (override));
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(bool, TakesNonConstReference, (int&));  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD(std::string, TakesConstReference, (const int&));
+
+#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+  MOCK_METHOD(bool, TakesConst, (const int));  // NOLINT
+#endif
+
+  // Tests that the function return type can contain unprotected comma.
+  MOCK_METHOD((std::map<int, std::string>), ReturnTypeWithComma, (), ());
+  MOCK_METHOD((std::map<int, std::string>), ReturnTypeWithComma, (int),
+              (const));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, OverloadedOnArgumentNumber, ());     // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, OverloadedOnArgumentNumber, (int));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, OverloadedOnArgumentType, (int));    // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD(char, OverloadedOnArgumentType, (char));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, OverloadedOnConstness, (), (override));          // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD(char, OverloadedOnConstness, (), (override, const));  // NOLINT
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, TypeWithHole, (int (*)()), ());  // NOLINT
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, TypeWithComma, ((const std::map<int, std::string>&)));
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, CTNullary, (), (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE)));
+  MOCK_METHOD(bool, CTUnary, (int), (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE)));
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, CTDecimal,
+              (bool b, char c, short d, int e, long f, float g, double h,
+               unsigned i, char* j, const std::string& k),
+              (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE)));
+  MOCK_METHOD(char, CTConst, (int), (const, Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE)));
+  MOCK_METHOD((std::map<int, std::string>), CTReturnTypeWithComma, (),
+              (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE)));
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+ private:
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockFoo);
+};
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(pop)
+#endif
+
+class MockMethodFunctionMockerTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  MockMethodFunctionMockerTest() : foo_(&mock_foo_) {}
+
+  FooInterface* const foo_;
+  MockFoo mock_foo_;
+};
+
+// Tests mocking a void-returning function.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksVoidFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, VoidReturning(Lt(100)));
+  foo_->VoidReturning(0);
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a nullary function.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksNullaryFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Nullary())
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, foo_->Nullary());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo_->Nullary());
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a unary function.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksUnaryFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Unary(Eq(2)))
+      .Times(2)
+      .WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(foo_->Unary(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->Unary(2));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a binary function.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksBinaryFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Binary(2, _))
+      .WillOnce(Return(3));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, foo_->Binary(2, 1));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a decimal function.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksDecimalFunction) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Decimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(),
+                                 Lt(100), 5U, NULL, "hi"))
+      .WillOnce(Return(5));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, foo_->Decimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 5, nullptr, "hi"));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a function that takes a non-const reference.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest,
+       MocksFunctionWithNonConstReferenceArgument) {
+  int a = 0;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesNonConstReference(Ref(a)))
+      .WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(foo_->TakesNonConstReference(a));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a function that takes a const reference.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstReferenceArgument) {
+  int a = 0;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesConstReference(Ref(a)))
+      .WillOnce(Return("Hello"));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello", foo_->TakesConstReference(a));
+}
+
+#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+// Tests mocking a function that takes a const variable.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstArgument) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesConst(Lt(10)))
+      .WillOnce(DoDefault());
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->TakesConst(5));
+}
+#endif  // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the number of arguments.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnArgumentNumber) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentNumber())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentNumber());
+}
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the types of argument.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnArgumentType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentType(An<int>()))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnArgumentType(TypedEq<char>('a')))
+      .WillOnce(Return('b'));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentType(0));
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', foo_->OverloadedOnArgumentType('a'));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest,
+       MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnConstnessOfThis) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, OverloadedOnConstness());
+  EXPECT_CALL(Const(mock_foo_), OverloadedOnConstness())
+      .WillOnce(Return('a'));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, foo_->OverloadedOnConstness());
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', Const(*foo_).OverloadedOnConstness());
+}
+
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksReturnTypeWithComma) {
+  const std::map<int, std::string> a_map;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, ReturnTypeWithComma())
+      .WillOnce(Return(a_map));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, ReturnTypeWithComma(42))
+      .WillOnce(Return(a_map));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(a_map, mock_foo_.ReturnTypeWithComma());
+  EXPECT_EQ(a_map, mock_foo_.ReturnTypeWithComma(42));
+}
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+// Tests mocking a nullary function with calltype.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksNullaryFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTNullary())
+      .WillOnce(Return(-1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(0));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(-1, foo_->CTNullary());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, foo_->CTNullary());
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a unary function with calltype.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksUnaryFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTUnary(Eq(2)))
+      .Times(2)
+      .WillOnce(Return(true))
+      .WillOnce(Return(false));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(foo_->CTUnary(2));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->CTUnary(2));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking a decimal function with calltype.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksDecimalFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(),
+                                   Lt(100), 5U, NULL, "hi"))
+      .WillOnce(Return(10));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, foo_->CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 5, NULL, "hi"));
+}
+
+// Tests mocking functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object.
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsConstFunctionWithCallType) {
+  EXPECT_CALL(Const(mock_foo_), CTConst(_))
+      .WillOnce(Return('a'));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', Const(*foo_).CTConst(0));
+}
+
+TEST_F(MockMethodFunctionMockerTest, MocksReturnTypeWithCommaAndCallType) {
+  const std::map<int, std::string> a_map;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTReturnTypeWithComma())
+      .WillOnce(Return(a_map));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(a_map, mock_foo_.CTReturnTypeWithComma());
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+class MockB {
+ public:
+  MockB() {}
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, DoB, ());
+
+ private:
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockB);
+};
+
+// Tests that functions with no EXPECT_CALL() rules can be called any
+// number of times.
+TEST(MockMethodExpectCallTest, UnmentionedFunctionCanBeCalledAnyNumberOfTimes) {
+  {
+    MockB b;
+  }
+
+  {
+    MockB b;
+    b.DoB();
+  }
+
+  {
+    MockB b;
+    b.DoB();
+    b.DoB();
+  }
+}
+
+// Tests mocking template interfaces.
+
+template <typename T>
+class StackInterface {
+ public:
+  virtual ~StackInterface() {}
+
+  // Template parameter appears in function parameter.
+  virtual void Push(const T& value) = 0;
+  virtual void Pop() = 0;
+  virtual int GetSize() const = 0;
+  // Template parameter appears in function return type.
+  virtual const T& GetTop() const = 0;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class MockStack : public StackInterface<T> {
+ public:
+  MockStack() {}
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, Push, (const T& elem), ());
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, Pop, (), (final));
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, GetSize, (), (const, override));
+  MOCK_METHOD(const T&, GetTop, (), (const));
+
+  // Tests that the function return type can contain unprotected comma.
+  MOCK_METHOD((std::map<int, int>), ReturnTypeWithComma, (), ());
+  MOCK_METHOD((std::map<int, int>), ReturnTypeWithComma, (int), (const));
+
+ private:
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockStack);
+};
+
+// Tests that template mock works.
+TEST(MockMethodTemplateMockTest, Works) {
+  MockStack<int> mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetSize())
+      .WillOnce(Return(0))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(0));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Push(_));
+  int n = 5;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetTop())
+      .WillOnce(ReturnRef(n));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Pop())
+      .Times(AnyNumber());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+  mock.Push(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mock.GetSize());
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.GetTop());
+  mock.Pop();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodTemplateMockTest, MethodWithCommaInReturnTypeWorks) {
+  MockStack<int> mock;
+
+  const std::map<int, int> a_map;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, ReturnTypeWithComma())
+      .WillOnce(Return(a_map));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, ReturnTypeWithComma(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(a_map));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(a_map, mock.ReturnTypeWithComma());
+  EXPECT_EQ(a_map, mock.ReturnTypeWithComma(1));
+}
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+// Tests mocking template interfaces with calltype.
+
+template <typename T>
+class StackInterfaceWithCallType {
+ public:
+  virtual ~StackInterfaceWithCallType() {}
+
+  // Template parameter appears in function parameter.
+  STDMETHOD_(void, Push)(const T& value) = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(void, Pop)() = 0;
+  STDMETHOD_(int, GetSize)() const = 0;
+  // Template parameter appears in function return type.
+  STDMETHOD_(const T&, GetTop)() const = 0;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class MockStackWithCallType : public StackInterfaceWithCallType<T> {
+ public:
+  MockStackWithCallType() {}
+
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, Push, (const T& elem),
+              (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE), override));
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, Pop, (), (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE), override));
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, GetSize, (), (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE), override, const));
+  MOCK_METHOD(const T&, GetTop, (),
+              (Calltype(STDMETHODCALLTYPE), override, const));
+
+ private:
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockStackWithCallType);
+};
+
+// Tests that template mock with calltype works.
+TEST(MockMethodTemplateMockTestWithCallType, Works) {
+  MockStackWithCallType<int> mock;
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetSize())
+      .WillOnce(Return(0))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(0));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Push(_));
+  int n = 5;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, GetTop())
+      .WillOnce(ReturnRef(n));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Pop())
+      .Times(AnyNumber());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+  mock.Push(5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mock.GetSize());
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.GetTop());
+  mock.Pop();
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mock.GetSize());
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+
+#define MY_MOCK_METHODS1_                       \
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, Overloaded, ());            \
+  MOCK_METHOD(int, Overloaded, (int), (const)); \
+  MOCK_METHOD(bool, Overloaded, (bool f, int n))
+
+class MockOverloadedOnArgNumber {
+ public:
+  MockOverloadedOnArgNumber() {}
+
+  MY_MOCK_METHODS1_;
+
+ private:
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockOverloadedOnArgNumber);
+};
+
+TEST(MockMethodOverloadedMockMethodTest, CanOverloadOnArgNumberInMacroBody) {
+  MockOverloadedOnArgNumber mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded());
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded(1)).WillOnce(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded(true, 1)).WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+  mock.Overloaded();
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, mock.Overloaded(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(mock.Overloaded(true, 1));
+}
+
+#define MY_MOCK_METHODS2_ \
+    MOCK_CONST_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(int n)); \
+    MOCK_METHOD1(Overloaded, int(int n));
+
+class MockOverloadedOnConstness {
+ public:
+  MockOverloadedOnConstness() {}
+
+  MY_MOCK_METHODS2_;
+
+ private:
+  GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockOverloadedOnConstness);
+};
+
+TEST(MockMethodOverloadedMockMethodTest, CanOverloadOnConstnessInMacroBody) {
+  MockOverloadedOnConstness mock;
+  const MockOverloadedOnConstness* const_mock = &mock;
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock, Overloaded(1)).WillOnce(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(*const_mock, Overloaded(1)).WillOnce(Return(3));
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, mock.Overloaded(1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, const_mock->Overloaded(1));
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, WorksForVoidNullary) {
+  MockFunction<void()> foo;
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call());
+  foo.Call();
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, WorksForNonVoidNullary) {
+  MockFunction<int()> foo;
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call())
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo.Call());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, foo.Call());
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, WorksForVoidUnary) {
+  MockFunction<void(int)> foo;
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call(1));
+  foo.Call(1);
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, WorksForNonVoidBinary) {
+  MockFunction<int(bool, int)> foo;
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call(false, 42))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call(true, Ge(100)))
+      .WillOnce(Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo.Call(false, 42));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, foo.Call(false, 42));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, foo.Call(true, 120));
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, WorksFor10Arguments) {
+  MockFunction<int(bool a0, char a1, int a2, int a3, int a4,
+                   int a5, int a6, char a7, int a8, bool a9)> foo;
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call(_, 'a', _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _))
+      .WillOnce(Return(1))
+      .WillOnce(Return(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, foo.Call(false, 'a', 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 'b', 0, true));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, foo.Call(true, 'a', 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 'b', 1, false));
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, AsStdFunction) {
+  MockFunction<int(int)> foo;
+  auto call = [](const std::function<int(int)> &f, int i) {
+    return f(i);
+  };
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call(1)).WillOnce(Return(-1));
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call(2)).WillOnce(Return(-2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(-1, call(foo.AsStdFunction(), 1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(-2, call(foo.AsStdFunction(), 2));
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, AsStdFunctionReturnsReference) {
+  MockFunction<int&()> foo;
+  int value = 1;
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call()).WillOnce(ReturnRef(value));
+  int& ref = foo.AsStdFunction()();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, ref);
+  value = 2;
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, ref);
+}
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, AsStdFunctionWithReferenceParameter) {
+  MockFunction<int(int &)> foo;
+  auto call = [](const std::function<int(int& )> &f, int &i) {
+    return f(i);
+  };
+  int i = 42;
+  EXPECT_CALL(foo, Call(i)).WillOnce(Return(-1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(-1, call(foo.AsStdFunction(), i));
+}
+
+
+struct MockMethodSizes0 {
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, func, ());
+};
+struct MockMethodSizes1 {
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, func, (int));
+};
+struct MockMethodSizes2 {
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, func, (int, int));
+};
+struct MockMethodSizes3 {
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, func, (int, int, int));
+};
+struct MockMethodSizes4 {
+  MOCK_METHOD(void, func, (int, int, int, int));
+};
+
+TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, MockMethodSizeOverhead) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes1));
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes4));
+}
+
+}  // namespace gmock_function_mocker_test
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
index a4602806..4c649a7e 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include "gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h"
 
 #include <functional>
+#include <memory>
 #include <sstream>
 #include <string>
 #include "gmock/gmock.h"
@@ -45,10 +46,6 @@ namespace gmock_generated_actions_test {
 
 using ::std::plus;
 using ::std::string;
-using testing::get;
-using testing::make_tuple;
-using testing::tuple;
-using testing::tuple_element;
 using testing::_;
 using testing::Action;
 using testing::ActionInterface;
@@ -60,7 +57,6 @@ using testing::ReturnNew;
 using testing::SetArgPointee;
 using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
 using testing::Unused;
-using testing::WithArgs;
 
 // For suppressing compiler warnings on conversion possibly losing precision.
 inline short Short(short n) { return n; }  // NOLINT
@@ -69,43 +65,19 @@ inline char Char(char ch) { return ch; }
 // Sample functions and functors for testing various actions.
 int Nullary() { return 1; }
 
-class NullaryFunctor {
- public:
-  int operator()() { return 2; }
-};
-
 bool g_done = false;
 
-bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; }
-
-const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; }
-
 bool ByConstRef(const std::string& s) { return s == "Hi"; }
 
 const double g_double = 0;
 bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; }
 
-std::string ByNonConstRef(std::string& s) { return s += "+"; }  // NOLINT
-
 struct UnaryFunctor {
   int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; }
 };
 
 const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; }  // NOLINT
 
-void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; }
-
-int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; }  // NOLINT
-
-void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; }
-
-int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; }
-
-std::string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-                    const char* s4) {
-  return std::string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4;
-}
-
 int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
 
 struct SumOf5Functor {
@@ -168,41 +140,41 @@ inline const char* CharPtr(const char* s) { return s; }
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function.
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) {
   Action<int(int, int(*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>();  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, &Nullary)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(2, &Nullary)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function.
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) {
   Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(UnaryFunctor())));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(UnaryFunctor())));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function.
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) {
   Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&SumOf5)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor.
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) {
   Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf5Functor())));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(SumOf5Functor())));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function.
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) {
   Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf6)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&SumOf6)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor.
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) {
   Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf6Functor())));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(SumOf6Functor())));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function.
@@ -211,7 +183,7 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) {
                                     const char*, const char*, const char*,
                                     const char*))>
       a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7");
-  EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat7)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat7)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function.
@@ -220,7 +192,7 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) {
                                     const char*, const char*, const char*,
                                     const char*, const char*))>
       a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8");
-  EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat8)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat8)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function.
@@ -229,7 +201,7 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) {
                                     const char*, const char*, const char*,
                                     const char*, const char*, const char*))>
       a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9");
-  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat9)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat9)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function.
@@ -238,14 +210,14 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) {
       const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
       const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*))>
       a = InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0");
-  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat10)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Concat10)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument.
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) {
   Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), Short(1));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Binary)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char*
@@ -253,7 +225,7 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) {
 TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) {
   Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", Short(1));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&Binary)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference.
@@ -263,7 +235,7 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) {
   // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary
   // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the
   // temporary object has already died.
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ByConstRef)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ByConstRef)));
 }
 
 // Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a
@@ -272,148 +244,11 @@ TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) {
   Action<bool(bool(*)(const double& x))> a =  // NOLINT
       InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double));
   // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value.
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
 
   double x = 0;
   a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x));  // This calls ByRef() on a non-const.
-  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs and with an action that takes 1 argument.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, OneArg) {
-  Action<bool(double x, int n)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 2 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, TwoArgs) {
-  Action<const char*(const char* s, double x, short n)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 2>(Invoke(Binary));
-  const char s[] = "Hello";
-  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr(s), 0.5, Short(2))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 3 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, ThreeArgs) {
-  Action<int(int, double, char, short)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 6.5, Char(20), Short(3))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 4 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, FourArgs) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*,
-                     const char*)>
-      a = WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4));
-  EXPECT_EQ("4310", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), 2.5,
-                                         CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 5 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                     const char*)>
-      a = WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5));
-  EXPECT_EQ("43210",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 6 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat6));
-  EXPECT_EQ("012210",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 7 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat7));
-  EXPECT_EQ("0123210",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 8 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat8));
-  EXPECT_EQ("01230123",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 9 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat9));
-  EXPECT_EQ("012312323",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat10));
-  EXPECT_EQ("0123210123",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that is not Invoke().
-class SubstractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> {  // NOLINT
- public:
-  virtual int Perform(const tuple<int, int>& args) {
-    return get<0>(args) - get<1>(args);
-  }
-};
-
-TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) {
-  Action<int(const std::string&, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubstractAction));
-  tuple<std::string, int, int> dummy = make_tuple(std::string("hi"), 2, 10);
-  EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(dummy));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, Identity) {
-  Action<int(int x, char y, short z)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2>(Invoke(Ternary));
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, Char(20), Short(3))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with repeated arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, RepeatedArguments) {
-  Action<int(bool, int m, int n)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<1, 1, 1, 1>(Invoke(SumOf4));
-  EXPECT_EQ(4, a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1, 10)));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with reversed argument order.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, ReversedArgumentOrder) {
-  Action<const char*(short n, const char* input)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<1, 0>(Invoke(Binary));
-  const char s[] = "Hello";
-  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(2), CharPtr(s))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with compatible, but not identical, argument types.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, ArgsOfCompatibleTypes) {
-  Action<long(short x, char y, double z, char c)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(100), Char(20), 5.6, Char(3))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that returns void.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, VoidAction) {
-  Action<void(double x, char c, int n)> a = WithArgs<2, 1>(Invoke(VoidBinary));
-  g_done = false;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 'a', 3));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
 }
 
 // Tests DoAll(a1, a2).
@@ -421,7 +256,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) {
   int n = 0;
   Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
                               Return(2));
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple(&n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&n)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
 }
 
@@ -431,7 +266,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) {
   Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
                                     SetArgPointee<1>(2),
                                     Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
 }
@@ -445,7 +280,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) {
             SetArgPointee<1>(2),
             SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
             Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
@@ -461,7 +296,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) {
             SetArgPointee<2>('a'),
             SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
             Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
@@ -479,7 +314,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) {
             SetArgPointee<3>('b'),
             SetArgPointee<4>('c'),
             Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
@@ -499,7 +334,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) {
             SetArgPointee<4>('c'),
             SetArgPointee<5>('d'),
             Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
@@ -522,7 +357,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) {
             SetArgPointee<5>('d'),
             SetArgPointee<6>('e'),
             Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
@@ -547,7 +382,7 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) {
             SetArgPointee<6>('e'),
             SetArgPointee<7>('f'),
             Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
@@ -575,7 +410,8 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) {
             SetArgPointee<7>('f'),
             SetArgPointee<8>('g'),
             Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(
+      3, action.Perform(std::make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g)));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
   EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
@@ -592,11 +428,12 @@ TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) {
 // the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro
 // is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma.  Therefore
 // we suppress them here.
+// Also suppress C4503 decorated name length exceeded, name was truncated
 #ifdef _MSC_VER
 # pragma warning(push)
 # pragma warning(disable:4100)
+# pragma warning(disable:4503)
 #endif
-
 // Tests the ACTION*() macro family.
 
 // Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the
@@ -605,10 +442,10 @@ ACTION(Return5) { return 5; }
 
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) {
   Action<double()> a1 = Return5();
-  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5();
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, true)));
 }
 
 // Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void.
@@ -617,7 +454,7 @@ ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; }
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) {
   Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1();
   int n = 0;
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, &n));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, &n));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
 }
 
@@ -632,22 +469,22 @@ ACTION(IncrementArg2) {
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) {
   Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2();
   int n = 0;
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, false, &n));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, false, &n));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
 }
 
 // Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple
 // via args_type and args.
 ACTION(Sum2) {
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>();
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<std::tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>();
   args_type args_copy = args;
-  return get<0>(args_copy) + get<1>(args_copy);
+  return std::get<0>(args_copy) + std::get<1>(args_copy);
 }
 
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) {
   Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2();
   int dummy = 0;
-  EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, Char(6), &dummy)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, Char(6), &dummy)));
 }
 
 // Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function
@@ -662,8 +499,8 @@ ACTION(InvokeDummy) {
 
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) {
   Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy();
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false)));
 }
 
 // Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's
@@ -676,8 +513,8 @@ ACTION(InvokeDummy2) {
 
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) {
   Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2();
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false)));
 }
 
 // Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference.
@@ -689,7 +526,7 @@ ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) {
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) {
   Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg();
   const bool b = false;
-  EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(std::tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b)));
 }
 
 // Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference.
@@ -701,7 +538,7 @@ ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) {
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) {
   Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg();
   int n = 0;
-  EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(std::tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1)));
 }
 
 // Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace.
@@ -711,7 +548,7 @@ ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }
 
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) {
   Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum();
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, 2)));
 }
 
 // Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with
@@ -720,11 +557,11 @@ ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; }
 
 TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo();
-  EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(2)));
 
   Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo();
   int dummy;
-  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy)));
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy)));
 }
 
 // Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action.
@@ -732,7 +569,7 @@ ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }
 
 TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) {
   Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, true)));
 }
 
 // Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types
@@ -745,7 +582,7 @@ ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) {
 
 TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) {
   Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(Char(1), true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(Char(1), true)));
 }
 
 // Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function
@@ -753,7 +590,7 @@ TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) {
 TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) {
   Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail");
   const std::string re = "re";
-  tuple<const std::string> dummy = make_tuple(re);
+  std::tuple<const std::string> dummy = std::make_tuple(re);
   EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(dummy));
 }
 
@@ -774,16 +611,16 @@ TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) {
   typedef Action<const char*(bool, const char*)> MyAction;
 
   const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction();
-  EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
 
   const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi");
-  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
 
   const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you");
-  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
 }
 
 // Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3.
@@ -792,11 +629,11 @@ ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; }
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) {
   Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4);
-  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(3000, true)));
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(3000, true)));
 
   Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">");
   const std::string re = "re";
-  tuple<const std::string> dummy = make_tuple(re);
+  std::tuple<const std::string> dummy = std::make_tuple(re);
   EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(dummy));
 }
 
@@ -804,14 +641,14 @@ ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; }
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10)));
 }
 
 ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; }
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10)));
 }
 
 ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) {
@@ -820,7 +657,7 @@ ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) {
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10)));
 }
 
 ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) {
@@ -829,7 +666,7 @@ ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) {
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10)));
 }
 
 ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) {
@@ -838,7 +675,8 @@ ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) {
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8,
+            a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10)));
 }
 
 ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) {
@@ -847,7 +685,8 @@ ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) {
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9,
+            a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10)));
 }
 
 ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) {
@@ -859,7 +698,7 @@ ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) {
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) {
   Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
   EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10,
-            a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+            a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(10)));
 }
 
 // Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types.
@@ -876,8 +715,8 @@ TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) {
       PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r');
   Action<std::string(const char*)> promo =
       PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r'));
-  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
-  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
 }
 
 // Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a
@@ -926,10 +765,10 @@ Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) {
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) {
   Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2);
-  EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3);
-  EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Verifies the type of an ACTION*.
@@ -987,7 +826,7 @@ ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) {
 
 TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) {
   int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3;
-  const tuple<> empty = make_tuple();
+  const std::tuple<> empty = std::make_tuple();
 
   Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x);
   EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty));
@@ -1014,7 +853,7 @@ class NullaryConstructorClass {
 // Tests using ReturnNew() with a nullary constructor.
 TEST(ReturnNewTest, NoArgs) {
   Action<NullaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<NullaryConstructorClass>();
-  NullaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  NullaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ(123, c->value_);
   delete c;
 }
@@ -1028,7 +867,7 @@ class UnaryConstructorClass {
 // Tests using ReturnNew() with a unary constructor.
 TEST(ReturnNewTest, Unary) {
   Action<UnaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
-  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
   delete c;
 }
@@ -1036,7 +875,7 @@ TEST(ReturnNewTest, Unary) {
 TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodHasArgs) {
   Action<UnaryConstructorClass*(bool, int)> a =
       ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
-  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5));
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(std::make_tuple(false, 5));
   EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
   delete c;
 }
@@ -1044,7 +883,7 @@ TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodHasArgs) {
 TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodReturnsPointerToConst) {
   Action<const UnaryConstructorClass*()> a =
       ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
-  const UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  const UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
   delete c;
 }
@@ -1064,7 +903,7 @@ TEST(ReturnNewTest, ConstructorThatTakes10Arguments) {
       ReturnNew<TenArgConstructorClass>(1000000000, 200000000, 30000000,
                                         4000000, 500000, 60000,
                                         7000, 800, 90, 0);
-  TenArgConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  TenArgConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ(1234567890, c->value_);
   delete c;
 }
@@ -1078,7 +917,7 @@ ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
 
 TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) {
   const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>();
-  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  int* p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   delete p;
 }
 
@@ -1091,7 +930,7 @@ ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
 
 TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) {
   const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42);
-  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  int* p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
   delete p;
 }
@@ -1100,7 +939,7 @@ TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) {
 ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg,
                 HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k),
                 AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
-  delete get<k>(args);
+  delete std::get<k>(args);
 }
 
 // Resets a bool variable in the destructor.
@@ -1117,7 +956,7 @@ TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) {
   int n = 0;
   bool b = true;
   BoolResetter* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b);
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(&n, resetter));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(&n, resetter));
   EXPECT_FALSE(b);  // Verifies that resetter is deleted.
 }
 
@@ -1130,9 +969,9 @@ ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer,
 }
 
 TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) {
-  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
-  const Action<linked_ptr<int>()> a = ReturnSmartPointer<linked_ptr>(42);
-  linked_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  const Action<std::shared_ptr<int>()> a =
+      ReturnSmartPointer<std::shared_ptr>(42);
+  std::shared_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
 }
 
@@ -1162,12 +1001,11 @@ ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant,
 }
 
 TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) {
-  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
-  typedef GiantTemplate<linked_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5,
-      true, 6, char, unsigned, int> Giant;
-  const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<
-      int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, unsigned, int, linked_ptr>(42);
-  Giant giant = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  using Giant = GiantTemplate<std::shared_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5, true, 6,
+                              char, unsigned, int>;
+  const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char,
+                                        unsigned, int, std::shared_ptr>(42);
+  Giant giant = a.Perform(std::make_tuple());
   EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value);
 }
 
@@ -1180,7 +1018,7 @@ ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
 
 TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) {
   const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
-  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded
@@ -1214,16 +1052,13 @@ TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) {
   const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2);
   const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3);
   const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
-#ifdef _MSC_VER
-# pragma warning(pop)
-#endif
 
 }  // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test
 }  // namespace testing
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc
index 820a2b69..52d9b8b8 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-function-mockers_test.cc
@@ -46,13 +46,6 @@
 #include "gmock/gmock.h"
 #include "gtest/gtest.h"
 
-// There is a bug in MSVC (fixed in VS 2008) that prevents creating a
-// mock for a function with const arguments, so we don't test such
-// cases for MSVC versions older than 2008.
-#if !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
-# define GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
-#endif  // !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || (_MSC_VER >= 1500)
-
 namespace testing {
 namespace gmock_generated_function_mockers_test {
 
@@ -85,9 +78,7 @@ class FooInterface {
 
   virtual bool TakesNonConstReference(int& n) = 0;  // NOLINT
   virtual std::string TakesConstReference(const int& n) = 0;
-#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
   virtual bool TakesConst(const int x) = 0;
-#endif  // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
 
   virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber() = 0;
   virtual int OverloadedOnArgumentNumber(int n) = 0;
@@ -136,10 +127,7 @@ class MockFoo : public FooInterface {
 
   MOCK_METHOD1(TakesNonConstReference, bool(int&));  // NOLINT
   MOCK_METHOD1(TakesConstReference, std::string(const int&));
-
-#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
   MOCK_METHOD1(TakesConst, bool(const int));  // NOLINT
-#endif
 
   // Tests that the function return type can contain unprotected comma.
   MOCK_METHOD0(ReturnTypeWithComma, std::map<int, std::string>());
@@ -224,8 +212,8 @@ TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksBinaryFunction) {
 
 // Tests mocking a decimal function.
 TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksDecimalFunction) {
-  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Decimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(),
-                                 Lt(100), 5U, NULL, "hi"))
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, Decimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(), Lt(100), 5U,
+                                 nullptr, "hi"))
       .WillOnce(Return(5));
 
   EXPECT_EQ(5, foo_->Decimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 5, nullptr, "hi"));
@@ -249,7 +237,6 @@ TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstReferenceArgument) {
   EXPECT_EQ("Hello", foo_->TakesConstReference(a));
 }
 
-#ifdef GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
 // Tests mocking a function that takes a const variable.
 TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstArgument) {
   EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, TakesConst(Lt(10)))
@@ -257,7 +244,6 @@ TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionWithConstArgument) {
 
   EXPECT_FALSE(foo_->TakesConst(5));
 }
-#endif  // GMOCK_ALLOWS_CONST_PARAM_FUNCTIONS
 
 // Tests mocking functions overloaded on the number of arguments.
 TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksFunctionsOverloadedOnArgumentNumber) {
@@ -326,11 +312,11 @@ TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksUnaryFunctionWithCallType) {
 
 // Tests mocking a decimal function with calltype.
 TEST_F(FunctionMockerTest, MocksDecimalFunctionWithCallType) {
-  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(),
-                                   Lt(100), 5U, NULL, "hi"))
+  EXPECT_CALL(mock_foo_, CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1L, A<float>(), Lt(100), 5U,
+                                   nullptr, "hi"))
       .WillOnce(Return(10));
 
-  EXPECT_EQ(10, foo_->CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 5, NULL, "hi"));
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, foo_->CTDecimal(true, 'a', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 5, nullptr, "hi"));
 }
 
 // Tests mocking functions overloaded on the const-ness of this object.
@@ -596,7 +582,6 @@ TEST(MockFunctionTest, WorksFor10Arguments) {
   EXPECT_EQ(2, foo.Call(true, 'a', 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 'b', 1, false));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_
 TEST(MockFunctionTest, AsStdFunction) {
   MockFunction<int(int)> foo;
   auto call = [](const std::function<int(int)> &f, int i) {
@@ -628,7 +613,6 @@ TEST(MockFunctionTest, AsStdFunctionWithReferenceParameter) {
   EXPECT_EQ(-1, call(foo.AsStdFunction(), i));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_FUNCTION_
 
 struct MockMethodSizes0 {
   MOCK_METHOD0(func, void());
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc
index ae0280fc..965cbaa6 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-internal-utils_test.cc
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
 
 namespace {
 
-using ::testing::tuple;
 using ::testing::Matcher;
 using ::testing::internal::CompileAssertTypesEqual;
 using ::testing::internal::MatcherTuple;
@@ -48,24 +47,24 @@ using ::testing::internal::IgnoredValue;
 // Tests the MatcherTuple template struct.
 
 TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize0) {
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<>, MatcherTuple<tuple<> >::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<>, MatcherTuple<std::tuple<> >::type>();
 }
 
 TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize1) {
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<int> >,
-                          MatcherTuple<tuple<int> >::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<Matcher<int> >,
+                          MatcherTuple<std::tuple<int> >::type>();
 }
 
 TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize2) {
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char> >,
-                          MatcherTuple<tuple<int, char> >::type>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char> >,
+                          MatcherTuple<std::tuple<int, char> >::type>();
 }
 
 TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize5) {
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<
-      tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>, Matcher<double>,
-            Matcher<char*> >,
-      MatcherTuple<tuple<int, char, bool, double, char*> >::type>();
+      std::tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>, Matcher<double>,
+                 Matcher<char*> >,
+      MatcherTuple<std::tuple<int, char, bool, double, char*> >::type>();
 }
 
 // Tests the Function template struct.
@@ -73,8 +72,8 @@ TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ForSize5) {
 TEST(FunctionTest, Nullary) {
   typedef Function<int()> F;  // NOLINT
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, F::Result>();
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<>, F::ArgumentTuple>();
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<>, F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<>, F::ArgumentTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<>, F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(), F::MakeResultVoid>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<IgnoredValue(), F::MakeResultIgnoredValue>();
 }
@@ -83,8 +82,9 @@ TEST(FunctionTest, Unary) {
   typedef Function<int(bool)> F;  // NOLINT
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, F::Result>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<bool, F::Argument1>();
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool>, F::ArgumentTuple>();
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<Matcher<bool> >, F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<bool>, F::ArgumentTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<Matcher<bool> >,
+                          F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool), F::MakeResultVoid>();  // NOLINT
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<IgnoredValue(bool),  // NOLINT
       F::MakeResultIgnoredValue>();
@@ -95,9 +95,10 @@ TEST(FunctionTest, Binary) {
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, F::Result>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<bool, F::Argument1>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<const long&, F::Argument2>();  // NOLINT
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool, const long&>, F::ArgumentTuple>();  // NOLINT
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::tuple<bool, const long&>,  // NOLINT
+                          F::ArgumentTuple>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<
-      tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<const long&> >,  // NOLINT
+      std::tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<const long&> >,  // NOLINT
       F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool, const long&), F::MakeResultVoid>();  // NOLINT
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<IgnoredValue(bool, const long&),  // NOLINT
@@ -112,11 +113,12 @@ TEST(FunctionTest, LongArgumentList) {
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<char*, F::Argument3>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<int&, F::Argument4>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<const long&, F::Argument5>();  // NOLINT
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<tuple<bool, int, char*, int&, const long&>,  // NOLINT
-                          F::ArgumentTuple>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<
-      tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<int>, Matcher<char*>, Matcher<int&>,
-            Matcher<const long&> >,  // NOLINT
+      std::tuple<bool, int, char*, int&, const long&>,  // NOLINT
+      F::ArgumentTuple>();
+  CompileAssertTypesEqual<
+      std::tuple<Matcher<bool>, Matcher<int>, Matcher<char*>, Matcher<int&>,
+                 Matcher<const long&> >,  // NOLINT
       F::ArgumentMatcherTuple>();
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<void(bool, int, char*, int&, const long&),  // NOLINT
                           F::MakeResultVoid>();
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc
index 10a4ac39..426e9545 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-generated-matchers_test.cc
@@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ using std::pair;
 using std::set;
 using std::stringstream;
 using std::vector;
-using testing::get;
-using testing::make_tuple;
-using testing::tuple;
 using testing::_;
 using testing::AllOf;
 using testing::AnyOf;
@@ -115,164 +112,16 @@ std::string Explain(const MatcherType& m, const Value& x) {
   return ss.str();
 }
 
-// Tests Args<k0, ..., kn>(m).
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsZeroTemplateArg) {
-  const tuple<int, bool> t(5, true);
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<>(Eq(tuple<>())));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<>(Ne(tuple<>()))));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsOneTemplateArg) {
-  const tuple<int, bool> t(5, true);
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<0>(Eq(make_tuple(5))));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<1>(Eq(make_tuple(true))));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<1>(Eq(make_tuple(false)))));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsTwoTemplateArgs) {
-  const tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
-
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 1>(Lt())));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<1, 2>(Lt())));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<0, 2>(Gt())));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsRepeatedTemplateArgs) {
-  const tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 0>(Eq())));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<1, 1>(Ne())));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsDecreasingTemplateArgs) {
-  const tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<2, 0>(Gt())));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<2, 1>(Lt())));
-}
-
-// The MATCHER*() macros trigger warning C4100 (unreferenced formal
-// parameter) in MSVC with -W4.  Unfortunately they cannot be fixed in
-// the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro
-// is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma.  Therefore
-// we suppress them here.
-#ifdef _MSC_VER
-# pragma warning(push)
-# pragma warning(disable:4100)
-#endif
-
-MATCHER(SumIsZero, "") {
-  return get<0>(arg) + get<1>(arg) + get<2>(arg) == 0;
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsMoreTemplateArgsThanArityOfOriginalTuple) {
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(-1, 2), (Args<0, 0, 1>(SumIsZero())));
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(1, 2), Not(Args<0, 0, 1>(SumIsZero())));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, CanBeNested) {
-  const tuple<short, int, long, int> t(4, 5, 6L, 6);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<1, 2, 3>(Args<1, 2>(Eq()))));
-  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 1, 3>(Args<0, 2>(Lt()))));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, CanMatchTupleByValue) {
-  typedef tuple<char, int, int> Tuple3;
-  const Matcher<Tuple3> m = Args<1, 2>(Lt());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple3('a', 1, 2)));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple3('b', 2, 2)));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, CanMatchTupleByReference) {
-  typedef tuple<char, char, int> Tuple3;
-  const Matcher<const Tuple3&> m = Args<0, 1>(Lt());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple3('a', 'b', 2)));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple3('b', 'b', 2)));
-}
-
-// Validates that arg is printed as str.
-MATCHER_P(PrintsAs, str, "") {
-  return testing::PrintToString(arg) == str;
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsTenTemplateArgs) {
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(0, 1L, 2, 3L, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9),
-              (Args<9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(
-                  PrintsAs("(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)"))));
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(0, 1L, 2, 3L, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9),
-              Not(Args<9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(
-                      PrintsAs("(0, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)"))));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, DescirbesSelfCorrectly) {
-  const Matcher<tuple<int, bool, char> > m = Args<2, 0>(Lt());
-  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#2, #0) are a pair where "
-            "the first < the second",
-            Describe(m));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, DescirbesNestedArgsCorrectly) {
-  const Matcher<const tuple<int, bool, char, int>&> m =
-      Args<0, 2, 3>(Args<2, 0>(Lt()));
-  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#0, #2, #3) are a tuple "
-            "whose fields (#2, #0) are a pair where the first < the second",
-            Describe(m));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, DescribesNegationCorrectly) {
-  const Matcher<tuple<int, char> > m = Args<1, 0>(Gt());
-  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#1, #0) aren't a pair "
-            "where the first > the second",
-            DescribeNegation(m));
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, ExplainsMatchResultWithoutInnerExplanation) {
-  const Matcher<tuple<bool, int, int> > m = Args<1, 2>(Eq());
-  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#1, #2) are (42, 42)",
-            Explain(m, make_tuple(false, 42, 42)));
-  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#1, #2) are (42, 43)",
-            Explain(m, make_tuple(false, 42, 43)));
-}
-
-// For testing Args<>'s explanation.
-class LessThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<tuple<char, int> > {
- public:
-  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {}
-
-  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(tuple<char, int> value,
-                               MatchResultListener* listener) const {
-    const int diff = get<0>(value) - get<1>(value);
-    if (diff > 0) {
-      *listener << "where the first value is " << diff
-                << " more than the second";
-    }
-    return diff < 0;
-  }
-};
-
-Matcher<tuple<char, int> > LessThan() {
-  return MakeMatcher(new LessThanMatcher);
-}
-
-TEST(ArgsTest, ExplainsMatchResultWithInnerExplanation) {
-  const Matcher<tuple<char, int, int> > m = Args<0, 2>(LessThan());
-  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#0, #2) are ('a' (97, 0x61), 42), "
-            "where the first value is 55 more than the second",
-            Explain(m, make_tuple('a', 42, 42)));
-  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#0, #2) are ('\\0', 43)",
-            Explain(m, make_tuple('\0', 42, 43)));
-}
-
 // For testing ExplainMatchResultTo().
 class GreaterThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<int> {
  public:
   explicit GreaterThanMatcher(int rhs) : rhs_(rhs) {}
 
-  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+  void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const override {
     *os << "is greater than " << rhs_;
   }
 
-  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int lhs,
-                               MatchResultListener* listener) const {
+  bool MatchAndExplain(int lhs, MatchResultListener* listener) const override {
     const int diff = lhs - rhs_;
     if (diff > 0) {
       *listener << "which is " << diff << " more than " << rhs_;
@@ -517,7 +366,7 @@ class NativeArrayPassedAsPointerAndSize {
 
 TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithNativeArrayPassedAsPointerAndSize) {
   int array[] = { 0, 1 };
-  ::testing::tuple<int*, size_t> array_as_tuple(array, 2);
+  ::std::tuple<int*, size_t> array_as_tuple(array, 2);
   EXPECT_THAT(array_as_tuple, ElementsAre(0, 1));
   EXPECT_THAT(array_as_tuple, Not(ElementsAre(0)));
 
@@ -571,8 +420,8 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, MakesCopyOfArguments) {
   int x = 1;
   int y = 2;
   // This should make a copy of x and y.
-  ::testing::internal::ElementsAreMatcher<testing::tuple<int, int> >
-          polymorphic_matcher = ElementsAre(x, y);
+  ::testing::internal::ElementsAreMatcher<std::tuple<int, int> >
+      polymorphic_matcher = ElementsAre(x, y);
   // Changing x and y now shouldn't affect the meaning of the above matcher.
   x = y = 0;
   const int array1[] = { 1, 2 };
@@ -640,7 +489,6 @@ TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithVector) {
   EXPECT_THAT(test_vector, Not(ElementsAreArray(expected)));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 
 TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerList) {
   const int a[5] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
@@ -676,7 +524,6 @@ TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest,
       { Eq(1), Ne(-2), Ge(3), Le(4), Eq(6) })));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 
 TEST(ElementsAreArrayTest, CanBeCreatedWithMatcherVector) {
   const int a[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
@@ -1235,8 +1082,8 @@ TEST(ContainsTest, AcceptsMatcher) {
 TEST(ContainsTest, WorksForNativeArrayAsTuple) {
   const int a[] = { 1, 2 };
   const int* const pointer = a;
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(pointer, 2), Contains(1));
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(pointer, 2), Not(Contains(Gt(3))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(pointer, 2), Contains(1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(pointer, 2), Not(Contains(Gt(3))));
 }
 
 TEST(ContainsTest, WorksForTwoDimensionalNativeArray) {
@@ -1290,11 +1137,6 @@ TEST(AnyOfTest, DoesNotCallAnyOfUnqualified) {
 
 }  // namespace adl_test
 
-#ifdef _MSC_VER
-# pragma warning(pop)
-#endif
-
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 TEST(AllOfTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) {
   std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3));
@@ -1332,7 +1174,6 @@ TEST(MatcherPMacroTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) {
   EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(UniquePointee(2)));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LASNG_CXX11
 
 }  // namespace
 
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
index 7116e4fc..4c36cfb8 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-internal-utils_test.cc
@@ -123,15 +123,9 @@ TEST(ConvertIdentifierNameToWordsTest, WorksWhenNameIsMixture) {
 }
 
 TEST(PointeeOfTest, WorksForSmartPointers) {
-  CompileAssertTypesEqual<const char,
-      PointeeOf<internal::linked_ptr<const char> >::type>();
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<int, PointeeOf<std::unique_ptr<int> >::type>();
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_SHARED_PTR_
   CompileAssertTypesEqual<std::string,
                           PointeeOf<std::shared_ptr<std::string> >::type>();
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_SHARED_PTR_
 }
 
 TEST(PointeeOfTest, WorksForRawPointers) {
@@ -141,20 +135,12 @@ TEST(PointeeOfTest, WorksForRawPointers) {
 }
 
 TEST(GetRawPointerTest, WorksForSmartPointers) {
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
   const char* const raw_p1 = new const char('a');  // NOLINT
   const std::unique_ptr<const char> p1(raw_p1);
   EXPECT_EQ(raw_p1, GetRawPointer(p1));
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_UNIQUE_PTR_
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_SHARED_PTR_
   double* const raw_p2 = new double(2.5);  // NOLINT
   const std::shared_ptr<double> p2(raw_p2);
   EXPECT_EQ(raw_p2, GetRawPointer(p2));
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_SHARED_PTR_
-
-  const char* const raw_p4 = new const char('a');  // NOLINT
-  const internal::linked_ptr<const char> p4(raw_p4);
-  EXPECT_EQ(raw_p4, GetRawPointer(p4));
 }
 
 TEST(GetRawPointerTest, WorksForRawPointers) {
@@ -308,26 +294,23 @@ TEST(LosslessArithmeticConvertibleTest, FloatingPointToFloatingPoint) {
 // Tests the TupleMatches() template function.
 
 TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize0) {
-  tuple<> matchers;
-  tuple<> values;
+  std::tuple<> matchers;
+  std::tuple<> values;
 
   EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values));
 }
 
 TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize1) {
-  tuple<Matcher<int> > matchers(Eq(1));
-  tuple<int> values1(1),
-      values2(2);
+  std::tuple<Matcher<int> > matchers(Eq(1));
+  std::tuple<int> values1(1), values2(2);
 
   EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values1));
   EXPECT_FALSE(TupleMatches(matchers, values2));
 }
 
 TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize2) {
-  tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char> > matchers(Eq(1), Eq('a'));
-  tuple<int, char> values1(1, 'a'),
-      values2(1, 'b'),
-      values3(2, 'a'),
+  std::tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char> > matchers(Eq(1), Eq('a'));
+  std::tuple<int, char> values1(1, 'a'), values2(1, 'b'), values3(2, 'a'),
       values4(2, 'b');
 
   EXPECT_TRUE(TupleMatches(matchers, values1));
@@ -337,10 +320,11 @@ TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize2) {
 }
 
 TEST(TupleMatchesTest, WorksForSize5) {
-  tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>, Matcher<long>,  // NOLINT
-        Matcher<std::string> >
+  std::tuple<Matcher<int>, Matcher<char>, Matcher<bool>,
+             Matcher<long>,  // NOLINT
+             Matcher<std::string> >
       matchers(Eq(1), Eq('a'), Eq(true), Eq(2L), Eq("hi"));
-  tuple<int, char, bool, long, std::string>  // NOLINT
+  std::tuple<int, char, bool, long, std::string>  // NOLINT
       values1(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hi"), values2(1, 'a', true, 2L, "hello"),
       values3(2, 'a', true, 2L, "hi");
 
@@ -387,11 +371,9 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, FailsNonfatallyOnFalse) {
 
 class LogIsVisibleTest : public ::testing::Test {
  protected:
-  virtual void SetUp() {
-    original_verbose_ = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose);
-  }
+  void SetUp() override { original_verbose_ = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); }
 
-  virtual void TearDown() { GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = original_verbose_; }
+  void TearDown() override { GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = original_verbose_; }
 
   std::string original_verbose_;
 };
@@ -450,11 +432,11 @@ TEST(LogTest, NoStackTraceWhenStackFramesToSkipIsNegative) {
 }
 
 struct MockStackTraceGetter : testing::internal::OsStackTraceGetterInterface {
-  virtual std::string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count) {
+  std::string CurrentStackTrace(int max_depth, int skip_count) override {
     return (testing::Message() << max_depth << "::" << skip_count << "\n")
         .GetString();
   }
-  virtual void UponLeavingGTest() {}
+  void UponLeavingGTest() override {}
 };
 
 // Tests that in opt mode, a positive stack_frames_to_skip argument is
@@ -686,22 +668,25 @@ TEST(StlContainerViewTest, WorksForStaticNativeArray) {
 
 TEST(StlContainerViewTest, WorksForDynamicNativeArray) {
   StaticAssertTypeEq<NativeArray<int>,
-      StlContainerView<tuple<const int*, size_t> >::type>();
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<NativeArray<double>,
-      StlContainerView<tuple<linked_ptr<double>, int> >::type>();
+                     StlContainerView<std::tuple<const int*, size_t> >::type>();
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<
+      NativeArray<double>,
+      StlContainerView<std::tuple<std::shared_ptr<double>, int> >::type>();
 
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<const NativeArray<int>,
-      StlContainerView<tuple<const int*, int> >::const_reference>();
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<
+      const NativeArray<int>,
+      StlContainerView<std::tuple<const int*, int> >::const_reference>();
 
   int a1[3] = { 0, 1, 2 };
   const int* const p1 = a1;
-  NativeArray<int> a2 = StlContainerView<tuple<const int*, int> >::
-      ConstReference(make_tuple(p1, 3));
+  NativeArray<int> a2 =
+      StlContainerView<std::tuple<const int*, int> >::ConstReference(
+          std::make_tuple(p1, 3));
   EXPECT_EQ(3U, a2.size());
   EXPECT_EQ(a1, a2.begin());
 
-  const NativeArray<int> a3 = StlContainerView<tuple<int*, size_t> >::
-      Copy(make_tuple(static_cast<int*>(a1), 3));
+  const NativeArray<int> a3 = StlContainerView<std::tuple<int*, size_t> >::Copy(
+      std::make_tuple(static_cast<int*>(a1), 3));
   ASSERT_EQ(3U, a3.size());
   EXPECT_EQ(0, a3.begin()[0]);
   EXPECT_EQ(1, a3.begin()[1]);
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
index 6d432340..03fa75b1 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc
@@ -32,12 +32,21 @@
 //
 // This file tests some commonly used argument matchers.
 
+// Silence warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from 'int' to 'short',
+// possible loss of data and C4100, unreferenced local parameter
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(push)
+# pragma warning(disable:4244)
+# pragma warning(disable:4100)
+#endif
+
 #include "gmock/gmock-matchers.h"
 #include "gmock/gmock-more-matchers.h"
 
 #include <string.h>
 #include <time.h>
 #include <deque>
+#include <forward_list>
 #include <functional>
 #include <iostream>
 #include <iterator>
@@ -48,22 +57,16 @@
 #include <set>
 #include <sstream>
 #include <string>
+#include <type_traits>
 #include <utility>
 #include <vector>
 #include "gmock/gmock.h"
 #include "gtest/gtest.h"
 #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_FORWARD_LIST_
-# include <forward_list>  // NOLINT
-#endif
-
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
-# include <type_traits>
-#endif
-
 namespace testing {
 namespace gmock_matchers_test {
+namespace {
 
 using std::greater;
 using std::less;
@@ -77,6 +80,7 @@ using std::pair;
 using std::set;
 using std::stringstream;
 using std::vector;
+using testing::_;
 using testing::A;
 using testing::AllArgs;
 using testing::AllOf;
@@ -102,12 +106,12 @@ using testing::Le;
 using testing::Lt;
 using testing::MakeMatcher;
 using testing::MakePolymorphicMatcher;
-using testing::MatchResultListener;
 using testing::Matcher;
 using testing::MatcherCast;
 using testing::MatcherInterface;
 using testing::Matches;
 using testing::MatchesRegex;
+using testing::MatchResultListener;
 using testing::NanSensitiveDoubleEq;
 using testing::NanSensitiveDoubleNear;
 using testing::NanSensitiveFloatEq;
@@ -127,16 +131,14 @@ using testing::StartsWith;
 using testing::StrCaseEq;
 using testing::StrCaseNe;
 using testing::StrEq;
-using testing::StrNe;
 using testing::StringMatchResultListener;
+using testing::StrNe;
 using testing::Truly;
 using testing::TypedEq;
 using testing::UnorderedPointwise;
 using testing::Value;
 using testing::WhenSorted;
 using testing::WhenSortedBy;
-using testing::_;
-using testing::get;
 using testing::internal::DummyMatchResultListener;
 using testing::internal::ElementMatcherPair;
 using testing::internal::ElementMatcherPairs;
@@ -144,29 +146,34 @@ using testing::internal::ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo;
 using testing::internal::FloatingEqMatcher;
 using testing::internal::FormatMatcherDescription;
 using testing::internal::IsReadableTypeName;
-using testing::internal::linked_ptr;
 using testing::internal::MatchMatrix;
+using testing::internal::PredicateFormatterFromMatcher;
 using testing::internal::RE;
-using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
 using testing::internal::StreamMatchResultListener;
-using testing::internal::Strings;
-using testing::internal::linked_ptr;
-using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
 using testing::internal::string;
-using testing::make_tuple;
-using testing::tuple;
+using testing::internal::Strings;
+
+// Helper for testing container-valued matchers in mock method context. It is
+// important to test matchers in this context, since it requires additional type
+// deduction beyond what EXPECT_THAT does, thus making it more restrictive.
+struct ContainerHelper {
+  MOCK_METHOD1(Call, void(std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>>));
+};
+
+std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>> MakeUniquePtrs(const std::vector<int>& ints) {
+  std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>> pointers;
+  for (int i : ints) pointers.emplace_back(new int(i));
+  return pointers;
+}
 
 // For testing ExplainMatchResultTo().
 class GreaterThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<int> {
  public:
   explicit GreaterThanMatcher(int rhs) : rhs_(rhs) {}
 
-  virtual void DescribeTo(ostream* os) const {
-    *os << "is > " << rhs_;
-  }
+  void DescribeTo(ostream* os) const override { *os << "is > " << rhs_; }
 
-  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int lhs,
-                               MatchResultListener* listener) const {
+  bool MatchAndExplain(int lhs, MatchResultListener* listener) const override {
     const int diff = lhs - rhs_;
     if (diff > 0) {
       *listener << "which is " << diff << " more than " << rhs_;
@@ -256,14 +263,12 @@ TEST(MatchResultListenerTest, IsInterestedWorks) {
 // change.
 class EvenMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<int> {
  public:
-  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int x,
-                               MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const {
+  bool MatchAndExplain(int x,
+                       MatchResultListener* /* listener */) const override {
     return x % 2 == 0;
   }
 
-  virtual void DescribeTo(ostream* os) const {
-    *os << "is an even number";
-  }
+  void DescribeTo(ostream* os) const override { *os << "is an even number"; }
 
   // We deliberately don't define DescribeNegationTo() and
   // ExplainMatchResultTo() here, to make sure the definition of these
@@ -279,7 +284,7 @@ TEST(MatcherInterfaceTest, CanBeImplementedUsingPublishedAPI) {
 
 class NewEvenMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<int> {
  public:
-  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(int x, MatchResultListener* listener) const {
+  bool MatchAndExplain(int x, MatchResultListener* listener) const override {
     const bool match = x % 2 == 0;
     // Verifies that we can stream to a listener directly.
     *listener << "value % " << 2;
@@ -291,9 +296,7 @@ class NewEvenMatcherImpl : public MatcherInterface<int> {
     return match;
   }
 
-  virtual void DescribeTo(ostream* os) const {
-    *os << "is an even number";
-  }
+  void DescribeTo(ostream* os) const override { *os << "is an even number"; }
 };
 
 TEST(MatcherInterfaceTest, CanBeImplementedUsingNewAPI) {
@@ -326,7 +329,7 @@ TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromValue) {
 
 // Tests that NULL can be used in place of Eq(NULL).
 TEST(MatcherTest, CanBeImplicitlyConstructedFromNULL) {
-  Matcher<int*> m1 = NULL;
+  Matcher<int*> m1 = nullptr;
   EXPECT_TRUE(m1.Matches(nullptr));
   int n = 0;
   EXPECT_FALSE(m1.Matches(&n));
@@ -1180,32 +1183,12 @@ TEST(IsNullTest, MatchesNullPointer) {
 #endif
 }
 
-TEST(IsNullTest, LinkedPtr) {
-  const Matcher<linked_ptr<int> > m = IsNull();
-  const linked_ptr<int> null_p;
-  const linked_ptr<int> non_null_p(new int);
-
-  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(null_p));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(non_null_p));
-}
-
-TEST(IsNullTest, ReferenceToConstLinkedPtr) {
-  const Matcher<const linked_ptr<double>&> m = IsNull();
-  const linked_ptr<double> null_p;
-  const linked_ptr<double> non_null_p(new double);
-
-  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(null_p));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(non_null_p));
-}
-
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 TEST(IsNullTest, StdFunction) {
   const Matcher<std::function<void()>> m = IsNull();
 
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(std::function<void()>()));
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches([]{}));
 }
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 // Tests that IsNull() describes itself properly.
 TEST(IsNullTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
@@ -1229,31 +1212,29 @@ TEST(NotNullTest, MatchesNonNullPointer) {
 }
 
 TEST(NotNullTest, LinkedPtr) {
-  const Matcher<linked_ptr<int> > m = NotNull();
-  const linked_ptr<int> null_p;
-  const linked_ptr<int> non_null_p(new int);
+  const Matcher<std::shared_ptr<int>> m = NotNull();
+  const std::shared_ptr<int> null_p;
+  const std::shared_ptr<int> non_null_p(new int);
 
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(null_p));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(non_null_p));
 }
 
 TEST(NotNullTest, ReferenceToConstLinkedPtr) {
-  const Matcher<const linked_ptr<double>&> m = NotNull();
-  const linked_ptr<double> null_p;
-  const linked_ptr<double> non_null_p(new double);
+  const Matcher<const std::shared_ptr<double>&> m = NotNull();
+  const std::shared_ptr<double> null_p;
+  const std::shared_ptr<double> non_null_p(new double);
 
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(null_p));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(non_null_p));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 TEST(NotNullTest, StdFunction) {
   const Matcher<std::function<void()>> m = NotNull();
 
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches([]{}));
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(std::function<void()>()));
 }
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 // Tests that NotNull() describes itself properly.
 TEST(NotNullTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
@@ -1536,7 +1517,6 @@ TEST(KeyTest, MatchesCorrectly) {
   EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(Key(Lt(25))));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 template <size_t I>
 struct Tag {};
 
@@ -1563,7 +1543,6 @@ TEST(PairTest, MatchesPairWithGetCorrectly) {
   std::vector<PairWithGet> v = {{11, "Foo"}, {29, "gMockIsBestMock"}};
   EXPECT_THAT(v, Contains(Key(29)));
 }
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 TEST(KeyTest, SafelyCastsInnerMatcher) {
   Matcher<int> is_positive = Gt(0);
@@ -1702,7 +1681,12 @@ TEST(PairTest, InsideContainsUsingMap) {
   EXPECT_THAT(container, Not(Contains(Pair(3, _))));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+TEST(ContainsTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(Contains(Pointee(2))));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1, 2}));
+}
+
 TEST(PairTest, UseGetInsteadOfMembers) {
   PairWithGet pair{7, "ABC"};
   EXPECT_THAT(pair, Pair(7, "ABC"));
@@ -1712,7 +1696,6 @@ TEST(PairTest, UseGetInsteadOfMembers) {
   std::vector<PairWithGet> v = {{11, "Foo"}, {29, "gMockIsBestMock"}};
   EXPECT_THAT(v, ElementsAre(Pair(11, string("Foo")), Pair(Ge(10), Not(""))));
 }
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 // Tests StartsWith(s).
 
@@ -2239,8 +2222,7 @@ TEST(GlobalWideEndsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
 
 #endif  // GTEST_HAS_GLOBAL_WSTRING
 
-
-typedef ::testing::tuple<long, int> Tuple2;  // NOLINT
+typedef ::std::tuple<long, int> Tuple2;  // NOLINT
 
 // Tests that Eq() matches a 2-tuple where the first field == the
 // second field.
@@ -2334,7 +2316,7 @@ TEST(Ne2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
 // Tests that FloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where
 // FloatEq(first field) matches the second field.
 TEST(FloatEq2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = FloatEq();
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(0.3f, 0.1f + 0.1f + 0.1f)));
@@ -2343,14 +2325,14 @@ TEST(FloatEq2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
 
 // Tests that FloatEq() describes itself properly.
 TEST(FloatEq2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m = FloatEq();
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<float, float>&> m = FloatEq();
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that NanSensitiveFloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where
 // NanSensitiveFloatEq(first field) matches the second field.
 TEST(NanSensitiveFloatEqTest, MatchesEqualArgumentsWithNaN) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveFloatEq();
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN(),
@@ -2362,14 +2344,14 @@ TEST(NanSensitiveFloatEqTest, MatchesEqualArgumentsWithNaN) {
 
 // Tests that NanSensitiveFloatEq() describes itself properly.
 TEST(NanSensitiveFloatEqTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m = NanSensitiveFloatEq();
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<float, float>&> m = NanSensitiveFloatEq();
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that DoubleEq() matches a 2-tuple where
 // DoubleEq(first field) matches the second field.
 TEST(DoubleEq2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = DoubleEq();
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0, 1.0)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(0.3, 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1)));
@@ -2378,14 +2360,14 @@ TEST(DoubleEq2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
 
 // Tests that DoubleEq() describes itself properly.
 TEST(DoubleEq2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m = DoubleEq();
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<double, double>&> m = DoubleEq();
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that NanSensitiveDoubleEq() matches a 2-tuple where
 // NanSensitiveDoubleEq(first field) matches the second field.
 TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleEqTest, MatchesEqualArgumentsWithNaN) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleEq();
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(),
@@ -2397,14 +2379,14 @@ TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleEqTest, MatchesEqualArgumentsWithNaN) {
 
 // Tests that DoubleEq() describes itself properly.
 TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleEqTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleEq();
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<double, double>&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleEq();
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that FloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where
 // FloatNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field.
 TEST(FloatNear2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = FloatNear(0.5f);
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.3f, 1.0f)));
@@ -2413,14 +2395,14 @@ TEST(FloatNear2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
 
 // Tests that FloatNear() describes itself properly.
 TEST(FloatNear2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m = FloatNear(0.5f);
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<float, float>&> m = FloatNear(0.5f);
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that NanSensitiveFloatNear() matches a 2-tuple where
 // NanSensitiveFloatNear(first field) matches the second field.
 TEST(NanSensitiveFloatNearTest, MatchesNearbyArgumentsWithNaN) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<float, float> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveFloatNear(0.5f);
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1f, 1.0f)));
@@ -2433,15 +2415,14 @@ TEST(NanSensitiveFloatNearTest, MatchesNearbyArgumentsWithNaN) {
 
 // Tests that NanSensitiveFloatNear() describes itself properly.
 TEST(NanSensitiveFloatNearTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<float, float>&> m =
-      NanSensitiveFloatNear(0.5f);
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<float, float>&> m = NanSensitiveFloatNear(0.5f);
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that FloatEq() matches a 2-tuple where
 // DoubleNear(first field, max_abs_error) matches the second field.
 TEST(DoubleNear2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = DoubleNear(0.5);
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0, 1.0)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.3, 1.0)));
@@ -2450,14 +2431,14 @@ TEST(DoubleNear2Test, MatchesEqualArguments) {
 
 // Tests that DoubleNear() describes itself properly.
 TEST(DoubleNear2Test, CanDescribeSelf) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m = DoubleNear(0.5);
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<double, double>&> m = DoubleNear(0.5);
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that NanSensitiveDoubleNear() matches a 2-tuple where
 // NanSensitiveDoubleNear(first field) matches the second field.
 TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleNearTest, MatchesNearbyArgumentsWithNaN) {
-  typedef ::testing::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
+  typedef ::std::tuple<double, double> Tpl;
   Matcher<const Tpl&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleNear(0.5f);
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.0f, 1.0f)));
   EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tpl(1.1f, 1.0f)));
@@ -2470,8 +2451,7 @@ TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleNearTest, MatchesNearbyArgumentsWithNaN) {
 
 // Tests that NanSensitiveDoubleNear() describes itself properly.
 TEST(NanSensitiveDoubleNearTest, CanDescribeSelfWithNaNs) {
-  Matcher<const ::testing::tuple<double, double>&> m =
-      NanSensitiveDoubleNear(0.5f);
+  Matcher<const ::std::tuple<double, double>&> m = NanSensitiveDoubleNear(0.5f);
   EXPECT_EQ("are an almost-equal pair", Describe(m));
 }
 
@@ -2686,7 +2666,6 @@ static void AnyOfMatches(int num, const Matcher<int>& m) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(num + 1));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 static void AnyOfStringMatches(int num, const Matcher<std::string>& m) {
   SCOPED_TRACE(Describe(m));
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(std::to_string(0)));
@@ -2696,7 +2675,6 @@ static void AnyOfStringMatches(int num, const Matcher<std::string>& m) {
   }
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(std::to_string(num + 1)));
 }
-#endif
 
 // Tests that AnyOf(m1, ..., mn) matches any value that matches at
 // least one of the given matchers.
@@ -2741,7 +2719,6 @@ TEST(AnyOfTest, MatchesWhenAnyMatches) {
   AnyOfMatches(10, AnyOf(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 // Tests the variadic version of the AnyOfMatcher.
 TEST(AnyOfTest, VariadicMatchesWhenAnyMatches) {
   // Also make sure AnyOf is defined in the right namespace and does not depend
@@ -2790,34 +2767,27 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, HugeMatcherUnordered) {
                                Eq(3), Eq(9), Eq(12), Eq(11), Ne(122)));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 // Tests that AnyOf(m1, ..., mn) describes itself properly.
 TEST(AnyOfTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
   Matcher<int> m;
   m = AnyOf(Le(1), Ge(3));
+
   EXPECT_EQ("(is <= 1) or (is >= 3)",
             Describe(m));
 
   m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2));
-  EXPECT_EQ("(is < 0) or "
-            "((is equal to 1) or (is equal to 2))",
-            Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is < 0) or (is equal to 1) or (is equal to 2)", Describe(m));
 
   m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2), Eq(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ("((is < 0) or "
-            "(is equal to 1)) or "
-            "((is equal to 2) or "
-            "(is equal to 3))",
+  EXPECT_EQ("(is < 0) or (is equal to 1) or (is equal to 2) or (is equal to 3)",
             Describe(m));
 
   m = AnyOf(Le(0), Gt(10), 3, 5, 7);
-  EXPECT_EQ("((is <= 0) or "
-            "(is > 10)) or "
-            "((is equal to 3) or "
-            "((is equal to 5) or "
-            "(is equal to 7)))",
-            Describe(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ(
+      "(is <= 0) or (is > 10) or (is equal to 3) or (is equal to 5) or (is "
+      "equal to 7)",
+      Describe(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that AnyOf(m1, ..., mn) describes its negation properly.
@@ -2828,24 +2798,20 @@ TEST(AnyOfTest, CanDescribeNegation) {
             DescribeNegation(m));
 
   m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2));
-  EXPECT_EQ("(isn't < 0) and "
-            "((isn't equal to 1) and (isn't equal to 2))",
+  EXPECT_EQ("(isn't < 0) and (isn't equal to 1) and (isn't equal to 2)",
             DescribeNegation(m));
 
   m = AnyOf(Lt(0), Eq(1), Eq(2), Eq(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ("((isn't < 0) and "
-            "(isn't equal to 1)) and "
-            "((isn't equal to 2) and "
-            "(isn't equal to 3))",
-            DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ(
+      "(isn't < 0) and (isn't equal to 1) and (isn't equal to 2) and (isn't "
+      "equal to 3)",
+      DescribeNegation(m));
 
   m = AnyOf(Le(0), Gt(10), 3, 5, 7);
-  EXPECT_EQ("((isn't <= 0) and "
-            "(isn't > 10)) and "
-            "((isn't equal to 3) and "
-            "((isn't equal to 5) and "
-            "(isn't equal to 7)))",
-            DescribeNegation(m));
+  EXPECT_EQ(
+      "(isn't <= 0) and (isn't > 10) and (isn't equal to 3) and (isn't equal "
+      "to 5) and (isn't equal to 7)",
+      DescribeNegation(m));
 }
 
 // Tests that monomorphic matchers are safely cast by the AnyOf matcher.
@@ -3081,8 +3047,8 @@ TEST(DescribeMatcherTest, WorksWithPolymorphicMatcher) {
 }
 
 TEST(AllArgsTest, WorksForTuple) {
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(1, 2L), AllArgs(Lt()));
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(2L, 1), Not(AllArgs(Lt())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(1, 2L), AllArgs(Lt()));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(2L, 1), Not(AllArgs(Lt())));
 }
 
 TEST(AllArgsTest, WorksForNonTuple) {
@@ -4171,9 +4137,7 @@ class AClass {
   // A getter that returns a reference to const.
   const std::string& s() const { return s_; }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
   const std::string& s_ref() const & { return s_; }
-#endif
 
   void set_s(const std::string& new_s) { s_ = new_s; }
 
@@ -4230,7 +4194,6 @@ TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForReferenceToConstProperty) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 // Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property() is
 // ref-qualified.
 TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForRefQualifiedProperty) {
@@ -4247,7 +4210,6 @@ TEST(PropertyTest, WorksForRefQualifiedProperty) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(a));
   EXPECT_FALSE(m_with_name.Matches(a));
 }
-#endif
 
 // Tests that Property(&Foo::property, ...) works when property()
 // returns a reference to non-const.
@@ -4610,7 +4572,6 @@ TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForPolymorphicFunctors) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(matcher_string.Matches("shrt"));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForPolymorphicFunctorsIgnoringResultType) {
   Matcher<int*> matcher = ResultOf(PolymorphicFunctor(), "good ptr");
 
@@ -4625,7 +4586,6 @@ TEST(ResultOfTest, WorksForLambdas) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(matcher.Matches(3));
   EXPECT_FALSE(matcher.Matches(1));
 }
-#endif
 
 const int* ReferencingFunction(const int& n) { return &n; }
 
@@ -4788,6 +4748,12 @@ TEST(IsEmptyTest, ExplainsResult) {
   EXPECT_EQ("whose size is 1", Explain(m, container));
 }
 
+TEST(IsEmptyTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(IsEmpty()));
+  helper.Call({});
+}
+
 TEST(IsTrueTest, IsTrueIsFalse) {
   EXPECT_THAT(true, IsTrue());
   EXPECT_THAT(false, IsFalse());
@@ -4795,8 +4761,8 @@ TEST(IsTrueTest, IsTrueIsFalse) {
   EXPECT_THAT(false, Not(IsTrue()));
   EXPECT_THAT(0, Not(IsTrue()));
   EXPECT_THAT(0, IsFalse());
-  EXPECT_THAT(NULL, Not(IsTrue()));
-  EXPECT_THAT(NULL, IsFalse());
+  EXPECT_THAT(nullptr, Not(IsTrue()));
+  EXPECT_THAT(nullptr, IsFalse());
   EXPECT_THAT(-1, IsTrue());
   EXPECT_THAT(-1, Not(IsFalse()));
   EXPECT_THAT(1, IsTrue());
@@ -4810,7 +4776,6 @@ TEST(IsTrueTest, IsTrueIsFalse) {
   EXPECT_THAT(&a, Not(IsFalse()));
   EXPECT_THAT(false, Not(IsTrue()));
   EXPECT_THAT(true, Not(IsFalse()));
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
   EXPECT_THAT(std::true_type(), IsTrue());
   EXPECT_THAT(std::true_type(), Not(IsFalse()));
   EXPECT_THAT(std::false_type(), IsFalse());
@@ -4823,7 +4788,6 @@ TEST(IsTrueTest, IsTrueIsFalse) {
   EXPECT_THAT(null_unique, IsFalse());
   EXPECT_THAT(nonnull_unique, IsTrue());
   EXPECT_THAT(nonnull_unique, Not(IsFalse()));
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 }
 
 TEST(SizeIsTest, ImplementsSizeIs) {
@@ -4858,6 +4822,23 @@ TEST(SizeIsTest, WorksWithReferences) {
   EXPECT_THAT(container, m);
 }
 
+TEST(SizeIsTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(SizeIs(3)));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1, 2, 3}));
+}
+
+// SizeIs should work for any type that provides a size() member function.
+// For example, a size_type member type should not need to be provided.
+struct MinimalistCustomType {
+  int size() const { return 1; }
+};
+TEST(SizeIsTest, WorksWithMinimalistCustomType) {
+  MinimalistCustomType container;
+  EXPECT_THAT(container, SizeIs(1));
+  EXPECT_THAT(container, Not(SizeIs(0)));
+}
+
 TEST(SizeIsTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
   Matcher<vector<int> > m = SizeIs(2);
   EXPECT_EQ("size is equal to 2", Describe(m));
@@ -4958,7 +4939,7 @@ TYPED_TEST(ContainerEqTest, DuplicateDifference) {
 }
 #endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
 
-// Tests that mutliple missing values are reported.
+// Tests that multiple missing values are reported.
 // Using just vector here, so order is predictable.
 TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, MultipleValuesMissing) {
   static const int vals[] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8};
@@ -5060,11 +5041,11 @@ TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, WorksForNativeArrayAsTuple) {
   const int b[] = {1, 2, 3, 4};
 
   const int* const p1 = a1;
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(p1, 3), ContainerEq(a2));
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(p1, 3), Not(ContainerEq(b)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(p1, 3), ContainerEq(a2));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(p1, 3), Not(ContainerEq(b)));
 
   const int c[] = {1, 3, 2};
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(p1, 3), Not(ContainerEq(c)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(p1, 3), Not(ContainerEq(c)));
 }
 
 TEST(ContainerEqExtraTest, CopiesNativeArrayParameter) {
@@ -5306,7 +5287,6 @@ TEST(StreamlikeTest, Iteration) {
   }
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_FORWARD_LIST_
 TEST(BeginEndDistanceIsTest, WorksWithForwardList) {
   std::forward_list<int> container;
   EXPECT_THAT(container, BeginEndDistanceIs(0));
@@ -5318,7 +5298,6 @@ TEST(BeginEndDistanceIsTest, WorksWithForwardList) {
   EXPECT_THAT(container, Not(BeginEndDistanceIs(0)));
   EXPECT_THAT(container, BeginEndDistanceIs(2));
 }
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_FORWARD_LIST_
 
 TEST(BeginEndDistanceIsTest, WorksWithNonStdList) {
   const int a[5] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
@@ -5333,6 +5312,12 @@ TEST(BeginEndDistanceIsTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
             DescribeNegation(m));
 }
 
+TEST(BeginEndDistanceIsTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(BeginEndDistanceIs(2)));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1, 2}));
+}
+
 TEST(BeginEndDistanceIsTest, ExplainsResult) {
   Matcher<vector<int> > m1 = BeginEndDistanceIs(2);
   Matcher<vector<int> > m2 = BeginEndDistanceIs(Lt(2));
@@ -5494,13 +5479,19 @@ TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, MatchAndExplain) {
                                  " - element #2 is matched by matcher #0"));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) {
   const int numbers[] = {1, 3, 6, 2, 4, 5};
   EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSupersetOf({1, 2}));
   EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSupersetOf({3, 0})));
 }
-#endif
+
+TEST(IsSupersetOfTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(IsSupersetOf({Pointee(1)})));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1, 2}));
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(Not(IsSupersetOf({Pointee(1), Pointee(2)}))));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({2}));
+}
 
 TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksForNativeArray) {
   const int subset[] = {1, 4};
@@ -5616,13 +5607,19 @@ TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, MatchAndExplain) {
                                  " - element #1 is matched by matcher #2"));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) {
   const int numbers[] = {1, 2, 3};
   EXPECT_THAT(numbers, IsSubsetOf({1, 2, 3, 4}));
   EXPECT_THAT(numbers, Not(IsSubsetOf({1, 2})));
 }
-#endif
+
+TEST(IsSubsetOfTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(IsSubsetOf({Pointee(1), Pointee(2)})));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1}));
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(Not(IsSubsetOf({Pointee(1)}))));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({2}));
+}
 
 // Tests using ElementsAre() and ElementsAreArray() with stream-like
 // "containers".
@@ -5657,6 +5654,15 @@ TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithUncopyable) {
   EXPECT_THAT(objs, ElementsAre(UncopyableIs(-3), Truly(ValueIsPositive)));
 }
 
+TEST(ElementsAreTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(ElementsAre(Pointee(1), Pointee(2))));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1, 2}));
+
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(ElementsAreArray({Pointee(3), Pointee(4)})));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({3, 4}));
+}
+
 TEST(ElementsAreTest, TakesStlContainer) {
   const int actual[] = {3, 1, 2};
 
@@ -5724,7 +5730,6 @@ TEST(UnorderedElementsAreArrayTest, TakesStlContainer) {
   EXPECT_THAT(actual, Not(UnorderedElementsAreArray(expected)));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 
 TEST(UnorderedElementsAreArrayTest, TakesInitializerList) {
   const int a[5] = {2, 1, 4, 5, 3};
@@ -5758,7 +5763,13 @@ TEST(UnorderedElementsAreArrayTest,
       {Eq(1), Ne(-2), Ge(3), Le(4), Eq(6)})));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
+
+TEST(UnorderedElementsAreArrayTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper,
+              Call(UnorderedElementsAreArray({Pointee(1), Pointee(2)})));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({2, 1}));
+}
 
 class UnorderedElementsAreTest : public testing::Test {
  protected:
@@ -5807,6 +5818,12 @@ TEST_F(UnorderedElementsAreTest, WorksForStreamlike) {
   EXPECT_THAT(s, Not(UnorderedElementsAre(2, 2, 3, 4, 5)));
 }
 
+TEST_F(UnorderedElementsAreTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(UnorderedElementsAre(Pointee(1), Pointee(2))));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({2, 1}));
+}
+
 // One naive implementation of the matcher runs in O(N!) time, which is too
 // slow for many real-world inputs. This test shows that our matcher can match
 // 100 inputs very quickly (a few milliseconds).  An O(100!) is 10^158
@@ -6246,13 +6263,15 @@ TEST(PolymorphicMatcherTest, CanAccessImpl) {
 
 TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ExplainsMatchFailure) {
   stringstream ss1;
-  ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo(make_tuple(Matcher<char>(Eq('a')), GreaterThan(5)),
-                             make_tuple('a', 10), &ss1);
+  ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo(
+      std::make_tuple(Matcher<char>(Eq('a')), GreaterThan(5)),
+      std::make_tuple('a', 10), &ss1);
   EXPECT_EQ("", ss1.str());  // Successful match.
 
   stringstream ss2;
-  ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo(make_tuple(GreaterThan(5), Matcher<char>(Eq('a'))),
-                             make_tuple(2, 'b'), &ss2);
+  ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo(
+      std::make_tuple(GreaterThan(5), Matcher<char>(Eq('a'))),
+      std::make_tuple(2, 'b'), &ss2);
   EXPECT_EQ("  Expected arg #0: is > 5\n"
             "           Actual: 2, which is 3 less than 5\n"
             "  Expected arg #1: is equal to 'a' (97, 0x61)\n"
@@ -6260,8 +6279,9 @@ TEST(MatcherTupleTest, ExplainsMatchFailure) {
             ss2.str());  // Failed match where both arguments need explanation.
 
   stringstream ss3;
-  ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo(make_tuple(GreaterThan(5), Matcher<char>(Eq('a'))),
-                             make_tuple(2, 'a'), &ss3);
+  ExplainMatchFailureTupleTo(
+      std::make_tuple(GreaterThan(5), Matcher<char>(Eq('a'))),
+      std::make_tuple(2, 'a'), &ss3);
   EXPECT_EQ("  Expected arg #0: is > 5\n"
             "           Actual: 2, which is 3 less than 5\n",
             ss3.str());  // Failed match where only one argument needs
@@ -6350,21 +6370,27 @@ TEST(EachTest, AcceptsMatcher) {
 TEST(EachTest, WorksForNativeArrayAsTuple) {
   const int a[] = {1, 2};
   const int* const pointer = a;
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(pointer, 2), Each(Gt(0)));
-  EXPECT_THAT(make_tuple(pointer, 2), Not(Each(Gt(1))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(pointer, 2), Each(Gt(0)));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(pointer, 2), Not(Each(Gt(1))));
+}
+
+TEST(EachTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(Each(Pointee(Gt(0)))));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1, 2}));
 }
 
 // For testing Pointwise().
 class IsHalfOfMatcher {
  public:
   template <typename T1, typename T2>
-  bool MatchAndExplain(const tuple<T1, T2>& a_pair,
+  bool MatchAndExplain(const std::tuple<T1, T2>& a_pair,
                        MatchResultListener* listener) const {
-    if (get<0>(a_pair) == get<1>(a_pair)/2) {
-      *listener << "where the second is " << get<1>(a_pair);
+    if (std::get<0>(a_pair) == std::get<1>(a_pair) / 2) {
+      *listener << "where the second is " << std::get<1>(a_pair);
       return true;
     } else {
-      *listener << "where the second/2 is " << get<1>(a_pair)/2;
+      *listener << "where the second/2 is " << std::get<1>(a_pair) / 2;
       return false;
     }
   }
@@ -6441,7 +6467,6 @@ TEST(PointwiseTest, WorksForVectorOfBool) {
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Not(Pointwise(Eq(), rhs)));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 
 TEST(PointwiseTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) {
   const vector<int> lhs{2, 4, 6};
@@ -6449,7 +6474,6 @@ TEST(PointwiseTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) {
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Not(Pointwise(Lt(), {3, 3, 7})));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 
 TEST(PointwiseTest, RejectsWrongSize) {
   const double lhs[2] = {1, 2};
@@ -6481,17 +6505,28 @@ TEST(PointwiseTest, AcceptsCorrectContent) {
 TEST(PointwiseTest, AllowsMonomorphicInnerMatcher) {
   const double lhs[3] = {1, 2, 3};
   const int rhs[3] = {2, 4, 6};
-  const Matcher<tuple<const double&, const int&> > m1 = IsHalfOf();
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<const double&, const int&>> m1 = IsHalfOf();
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Pointwise(m1, rhs));
   EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(Pointwise(m1, rhs), lhs));
 
-  // This type works as a tuple<const double&, const int&> can be
-  // implicitly cast to tuple<double, int>.
-  const Matcher<tuple<double, int> > m2 = IsHalfOf();
+  // This type works as a std::tuple<const double&, const int&> can be
+  // implicitly cast to std::tuple<double, int>.
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<double, int>> m2 = IsHalfOf();
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Pointwise(m2, rhs));
   EXPECT_EQ("", Explain(Pointwise(m2, rhs), lhs));
 }
 
+MATCHER(PointeeEquals, "Points to an equal value") {
+  return ExplainMatchResult(::testing::Pointee(::testing::get<1>(arg)),
+                            ::testing::get<0>(arg), result_listener);
+}
+
+TEST(PointwiseTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(Pointwise(PointeeEquals(), std::vector<int>{1, 2})));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({1, 2}));
+}
+
 TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, DescribesSelf) {
   vector<int> rhs;
   rhs.push_back(1);
@@ -6552,7 +6587,6 @@ TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, WorksForRhsNativeArray) {
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Not(UnorderedPointwise(Lt(), rhs)));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 
 TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) {
   const vector<int> lhs{2, 4, 6};
@@ -6560,7 +6594,6 @@ TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, WorksForRhsInitializerList) {
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, Not(UnorderedPointwise(Lt(), {1, 1, 7})));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_STD_INITIALIZER_LIST_
 
 TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, RejectsWrongSize) {
   const double lhs[2] = {1, 2};
@@ -6597,15 +6630,22 @@ TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, AcceptsCorrectContentInDifferentOrder) {
 TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, AllowsMonomorphicInnerMatcher) {
   const double lhs[3] = {1, 2, 3};
   const int rhs[3] = {4, 6, 2};
-  const Matcher<tuple<const double&, const int&> > m1 = IsHalfOf();
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<const double&, const int&>> m1 = IsHalfOf();
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, UnorderedPointwise(m1, rhs));
 
-  // This type works as a tuple<const double&, const int&> can be
-  // implicitly cast to tuple<double, int>.
-  const Matcher<tuple<double, int> > m2 = IsHalfOf();
+  // This type works as a std::tuple<const double&, const int&> can be
+  // implicitly cast to std::tuple<double, int>.
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<double, int>> m2 = IsHalfOf();
   EXPECT_THAT(lhs, UnorderedPointwise(m2, rhs));
 }
 
+TEST(UnorderedPointwiseTest, WorksWithMoveOnly) {
+  ContainerHelper helper;
+  EXPECT_CALL(helper, Call(UnorderedPointwise(PointeeEquals(),
+                                              std::vector<int>{1, 2})));
+  helper.Call(MakeUniquePtrs({2, 1}));
+}
+
 // Sample optional type implementation with minimal requirements for use with
 // Optional matcher.
 class SampleOptionalInt {
@@ -6746,7 +6786,6 @@ TEST(AnyWithTest, TestBadCastType) {
   EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(SampleAnyType(1)));
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 TEST(AnyWithTest, TestUseInContainers) {
   std::vector<SampleAnyType> a;
   a.emplace_back(1);
@@ -6763,7 +6802,6 @@ TEST(AnyWithTest, TestUseInContainers) {
                                    AnyWith<std::string>("merhaba"),
                                    AnyWith<std::string>("salut")}));
 }
-#endif  //  GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 TEST(AnyWithTest, TestCompare) {
   EXPECT_THAT(SampleAnyType(1), AnyWith<int>(Gt(0)));
 }
@@ -6783,8 +6821,6 @@ TEST(AnyWithTest, ExplainsSelf) {
   EXPECT_THAT(Explain(m, SampleAnyType(2)), "whose value 2 doesn't match");
 }
 
-#if GTEST_LANG_CXX11
-
 TEST(PointeeTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) {
   std::unique_ptr<int> p(new int(3));
   EXPECT_THAT(p, Pointee(Eq(3)));
@@ -6797,7 +6833,228 @@ TEST(NotTest, WorksOnMoveOnlyType) {
   EXPECT_THAT(p, Not(Pointee(Eq(2))));
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11
+// Tests Args<k0, ..., kn>(m).
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsZeroTemplateArg) {
+  const std::tuple<int, bool> t(5, true);
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<>(Eq(std::tuple<>())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<>(Ne(std::tuple<>()))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsOneTemplateArg) {
+  const std::tuple<int, bool> t(5, true);
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<0>(Eq(std::make_tuple(5))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Args<1>(Eq(std::make_tuple(true))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<1>(Eq(std::make_tuple(false)))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsTwoTemplateArgs) {
+  const std::tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
+
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 1>(Lt())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<1, 2>(Lt())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<0, 2>(Gt())));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsRepeatedTemplateArgs) {
+  const std::tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 0>(Eq())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<1, 1>(Ne())));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsDecreasingTemplateArgs) {
+  const std::tuple<short, int, long> t(4, 5, 6L);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<2, 0>(Gt())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, Not(Args<2, 1>(Lt())));
+}
+
+MATCHER(SumIsZero, "") {
+  return std::get<0>(arg) + std::get<1>(arg) + std::get<2>(arg) == 0;
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsMoreTemplateArgsThanArityOfOriginalTuple) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(-1, 2), (Args<0, 0, 1>(SumIsZero())));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(1, 2), Not(Args<0, 0, 1>(SumIsZero())));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, CanBeNested) {
+  const std::tuple<short, int, long, int> t(4, 5, 6L, 6);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<1, 2, 3>(Args<1, 2>(Eq()))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(t, (Args<0, 1, 3>(Args<0, 2>(Lt()))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, CanMatchTupleByValue) {
+  typedef std::tuple<char, int, int> Tuple3;
+  const Matcher<Tuple3> m = Args<1, 2>(Lt());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple3('a', 1, 2)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple3('b', 2, 2)));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, CanMatchTupleByReference) {
+  typedef std::tuple<char, char, int> Tuple3;
+  const Matcher<const Tuple3&> m = Args<0, 1>(Lt());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(m.Matches(Tuple3('a', 'b', 2)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(m.Matches(Tuple3('b', 'b', 2)));
+}
+
+// Validates that arg is printed as str.
+MATCHER_P(PrintsAs, str, "") {
+  return testing::PrintToString(arg) == str;
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, AcceptsTenTemplateArgs) {
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(0, 1L, 2, 3L, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9),
+              (Args<9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(
+                  PrintsAs("(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)"))));
+  EXPECT_THAT(std::make_tuple(0, 1L, 2, 3L, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9),
+              Not(Args<9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(
+                  PrintsAs("(0, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)"))));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, DescirbesSelfCorrectly) {
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<int, bool, char> > m = Args<2, 0>(Lt());
+  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#2, #0) are a pair where "
+            "the first < the second",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, DescirbesNestedArgsCorrectly) {
+  const Matcher<const std::tuple<int, bool, char, int>&> m =
+      Args<0, 2, 3>(Args<2, 0>(Lt()));
+  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#0, #2, #3) are a tuple "
+            "whose fields (#2, #0) are a pair where the first < the second",
+            Describe(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, DescribesNegationCorrectly) {
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<int, char> > m = Args<1, 0>(Gt());
+  EXPECT_EQ("are a tuple whose fields (#1, #0) aren't a pair "
+            "where the first > the second",
+            DescribeNegation(m));
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, ExplainsMatchResultWithoutInnerExplanation) {
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<bool, int, int> > m = Args<1, 2>(Eq());
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#1, #2) are (42, 42)",
+            Explain(m, std::make_tuple(false, 42, 42)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#1, #2) are (42, 43)",
+            Explain(m, std::make_tuple(false, 42, 43)));
+}
+
+// For testing Args<>'s explanation.
+class LessThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<std::tuple<char, int> > {
+ public:
+  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {}
+
+  virtual bool MatchAndExplain(std::tuple<char, int> value,
+                               MatchResultListener* listener) const {
+    const int diff = std::get<0>(value) - std::get<1>(value);
+    if (diff > 0) {
+      *listener << "where the first value is " << diff
+                << " more than the second";
+    }
+    return diff < 0;
+  }
+};
+
+Matcher<std::tuple<char, int> > LessThan() {
+  return MakeMatcher(new LessThanMatcher);
+}
+
+TEST(ArgsTest, ExplainsMatchResultWithInnerExplanation) {
+  const Matcher<std::tuple<char, int, int> > m = Args<0, 2>(LessThan());
+  EXPECT_EQ(
+      "whose fields (#0, #2) are ('a' (97, 0x61), 42), "
+      "where the first value is 55 more than the second",
+      Explain(m, std::make_tuple('a', 42, 42)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("whose fields (#0, #2) are ('\\0', 43)",
+            Explain(m, std::make_tuple('\0', 42, 43)));
+}
+
+class PredicateFormatterFromMatcherTest : public ::testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  enum Behavior { kInitialSuccess, kAlwaysFail, kFlaky };
 
+  // A matcher that can return different results when used multiple times on the
+  // same input. No real matcher should do this; but this lets us test that we
+  // detect such behavior and fail appropriately.
+  class MockMatcher : public MatcherInterface<Behavior> {
+   public:
+    bool MatchAndExplain(Behavior behavior,
+                         MatchResultListener* listener) const override {
+      *listener << "[MatchAndExplain]";
+      switch (behavior) {
+        case kInitialSuccess:
+          // The first call to MatchAndExplain should use a "not interested"
+          // listener; so this is expected to return |true|. There should be no
+          // subsequent calls.
+          return !listener->IsInterested();
+
+        case kAlwaysFail:
+          return false;
+
+        case kFlaky:
+          // The first call to MatchAndExplain should use a "not interested"
+          // listener; so this will return |false|. Subsequent calls should have
+          // an "interested" listener; so this will return |true|, thus
+          // simulating a flaky matcher.
+          return listener->IsInterested();
+      }
+
+      GTEST_LOG_(FATAL) << "This should never be reached";
+      return false;
+    }
+
+    void DescribeTo(ostream* os) const override { *os << "[DescribeTo]"; }
+
+    void DescribeNegationTo(ostream* os) const override {
+      *os << "[DescribeNegationTo]";
+    }
+  };
+
+  AssertionResult RunPredicateFormatter(Behavior behavior) {
+    auto matcher = MakeMatcher(new MockMatcher);
+    PredicateFormatterFromMatcher<Matcher<Behavior>> predicate_formatter(
+        matcher);
+    return predicate_formatter("dummy-name", behavior);
+  }
+
+  const std::string kMatcherType =
+      "testing::gmock_matchers_test::PredicateFormatterFromMatcherTest::"
+      "Behavior";
+};
+
+TEST_F(PredicateFormatterFromMatcherTest, ShortCircuitOnSuccess) {
+  AssertionResult result = RunPredicateFormatter(kInitialSuccess);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(result);  // Implicit cast to bool.
+  std::string expect;
+  EXPECT_EQ(expect, result.message());
+}
+
+TEST_F(PredicateFormatterFromMatcherTest, NoShortCircuitOnFailure) {
+  AssertionResult result = RunPredicateFormatter(kAlwaysFail);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(result);  // Implicit cast to bool.
+  std::string expect =
+      "Value of: dummy-name\nExpected: [DescribeTo]\n"
+      "  Actual: 1, [MatchAndExplain]";
+  EXPECT_EQ(expect, result.message());
+}
+
+TEST_F(PredicateFormatterFromMatcherTest, DetectsFlakyShortCircuit) {
+  AssertionResult result = RunPredicateFormatter(kFlaky);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(result);  // Implicit cast to bool.
+  std::string expect =
+      "Value of: dummy-name\nExpected: [DescribeTo]\n"
+      "  The matcher failed on the initial attempt; but passed when rerun to "
+      "generate the explanation.\n"
+      "  Actual: 2, [MatchAndExplain]";
+  EXPECT_EQ(expect, result.message());
+}
+
+}  // namespace
 }  // namespace gmock_matchers_test
 }  // namespace testing
+
+#ifdef _MSC_VER
+# pragma warning(pop)
+#endif
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc
index 976b245e..b4e0fc30 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-more-actions_test.cc
@@ -35,21 +35,17 @@
 #include "gmock/gmock-more-actions.h"
 
 #include <functional>
+#include <memory>
 #include <sstream>
 #include <string>
 #include "gmock/gmock.h"
 #include "gtest/gtest.h"
-#include "gtest/internal/gtest-linked_ptr.h"
 
 namespace testing {
 namespace gmock_more_actions_test {
 
 using ::std::plus;
 using ::std::string;
-using testing::get;
-using testing::make_tuple;
-using testing::tuple;
-using testing::tuple_element;
 using testing::_;
 using testing::Action;
 using testing::ActionInterface;
@@ -65,7 +61,6 @@ using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
 using testing::Unused;
 using testing::WithArg;
 using testing::WithoutArgs;
-using testing::internal::linked_ptr;
 
 // For suppressing compiler warnings on conversion possibly losing precision.
 inline short Short(short n) { return n; }  // NOLINT
@@ -232,45 +227,46 @@ class Foo {
 // Tests using Invoke() with a nullary function.
 TEST(InvokeTest, Nullary) {
   Action<int()> a = Invoke(Nullary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a unary function.
 TEST(InvokeTest, Unary) {
   Action<bool(int)> a = Invoke(Unary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1)));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(-1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(-1)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a binary function.
 TEST(InvokeTest, Binary) {
   Action<const char*(const char*, short)> a = Invoke(Binary);  // NOLINT
   const char* p = "Hello";
-  EXPECT_EQ(p + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(p, Short(2))));
+  EXPECT_EQ(p + 2, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(p, Short(2))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a ternary function.
 TEST(InvokeTest, Ternary) {
   Action<int(int, char, short)> a = Invoke(Ternary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(make_tuple(1, '\2', Short(3))));
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, '\2', Short(3))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 4-argument function.
 TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes4Arguments) {
   Action<int(int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf4);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1234, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1234, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 5-argument function.
 TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes5Arguments) {
   Action<int(int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf5);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 6-argument function.
 TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes6Arguments) {
   Action<int(int, int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf6);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456,
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
 }
 
 // A helper that turns the type of a C-string literal from const
@@ -283,9 +279,9 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes7Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*, const char*)>
       a = Invoke(Concat7);
   EXPECT_EQ("1234567",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"))));
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                                      CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                                      CharPtr("7"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument function.
@@ -294,9 +290,9 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes8Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)>
       a = Invoke(Concat8);
   EXPECT_EQ("12345678",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"))));
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                                      CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                                      CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument function.
@@ -305,10 +301,10 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes9Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
                      const char*)>
       a = Invoke(Concat9);
-  EXPECT_EQ("123456789",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"))));
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(
+                             CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                             CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                             CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument function.
@@ -318,46 +314,46 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes10Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*)>
       a = Invoke(Concat10);
   EXPECT_EQ("1234567890",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"),
-                                 CharPtr("0"))));
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                                      CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                                      CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"),
+                                      CharPtr("0"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with functions with parameters declared as Unused.
 TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithUnusedParameters) {
   Action<int(int, int, double, const std::string&)> a1 = Invoke(SumOfFirst2);
-  tuple<int, int, double, std::string> dummy =
-      make_tuple(10, 2, 5.6, std::string("hi"));
+  std::tuple<int, int, double, std::string> dummy =
+      std::make_tuple(10, 2, 5.6, std::string("hi"));
   EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(dummy));
 
   Action<int(int, int, bool, int*)> a2 =
       Invoke(SumOfFirst2);
-  EXPECT_EQ(23,
-            a2.Perform(make_tuple(20, 3, true, static_cast<int*>(nullptr))));
+  EXPECT_EQ(
+      23, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple(20, 3, true, static_cast<int*>(nullptr))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with methods with parameters declared as Unused.
 TEST(InvokeTest, MethodWithUnusedParameters) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<int(std::string, bool, int, int)> a1 = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2);
-  EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("hi"), true, 10, 2)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("hi"), true, 10, 2)));
 
   Action<int(char, double, int, int)> a2 =
       Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2);
-  EXPECT_EQ(23, a2.Perform(make_tuple('a', 2.5, 20, 3)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(23, a2.Perform(std::make_tuple('a', 2.5, 20, 3)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a functor.
 TEST(InvokeTest, Functor) {
   Action<long(long, int)> a = Invoke(plus<long>());  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(3L, a.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3L, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1, 2)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke(f) as an action of a compatible type.
 TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithCompatibleType) {
   Action<long(int, short, char, bool)> a = Invoke(SumOf4);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(4321, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000, Short(300), Char(20), true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4321, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(4000, Short(300), Char(20), true)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with an object pointer and a method pointer.
@@ -366,14 +362,14 @@ TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithCompatibleType) {
 TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Nullary) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<int()> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Nullary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a unary method.
 TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Unary) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<short(long)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Unary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(4123, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4123, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(4000)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a binary method.
@@ -381,7 +377,7 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Binary) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<std::string(const std::string&, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Binary);
   std::string s("Hell");
-  tuple<std::string, char> dummy = make_tuple(s, 'o');
+  std::tuple<std::string, char> dummy = std::make_tuple(s, 'o');
   EXPECT_EQ("Hello", a.Perform(dummy));
 }
 
@@ -389,21 +385,21 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Binary) {
 TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Ternary) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<int(int, bool, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Ternary);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1124, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, true, Char(1))));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1124, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1000, true, Char(1))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 4-argument method.
 TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes4Arguments) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<int(int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf4);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1357, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1357, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 5-argument method.
 TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes5Arguments) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<int(int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf5);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 6-argument method.
@@ -411,7 +407,8 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes6Arguments) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<int(int, int, int, int, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
       Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456,
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 7-argument method.
@@ -421,9 +418,9 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes7Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*, const char*)>
       a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat7);
   EXPECT_EQ("1234567",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"))));
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                                      CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                                      CharPtr("7"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument method.
@@ -433,9 +430,9 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes8Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)>
       a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat8);
   EXPECT_EQ("12345678",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"))));
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                                      CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                                      CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument method.
@@ -445,10 +442,10 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes9Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
                      const char*)>
       a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat9);
-  EXPECT_EQ("123456789",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"))));
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(
+                             CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                             CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                             CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument method.
@@ -459,10 +456,10 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes10Arguments) {
                      const char*, const char*)>
       a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat10);
   EXPECT_EQ("1234567890",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
-                                 CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
-                                 CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"),
-                                 CharPtr("0"))));
+            a.Perform(std::make_tuple(CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"), CharPtr("3"),
+                                      CharPtr("4"), CharPtr("5"), CharPtr("6"),
+                                      CharPtr("7"), CharPtr("8"), CharPtr("9"),
+                                      CharPtr("0"))));
 }
 
 // Tests using Invoke(f) as an action of a compatible type.
@@ -470,48 +467,48 @@ TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodWithCompatibleType) {
   Foo foo;
   Action<long(int, short, char, bool)> a =  // NOLINT
       Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf4);
-  EXPECT_EQ(4444, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000, Short(300), Char(20), true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4444, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(4000, Short(300), Char(20), true)));
 }
 
 // Tests using WithoutArgs with an action that takes no argument.
 TEST(WithoutArgsTest, NoArg) {
   Action<int(int n)> a = WithoutArgs(Invoke(Nullary));  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(2)));
 }
 
 // Tests using WithArg with an action that takes 1 argument.
 TEST(WithArgTest, OneArg) {
   Action<bool(double x, int n)> b = WithArg<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_TRUE(b.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(b.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(b.Perform(std::make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(b.Perform(std::make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
 }
 
 TEST(ReturnArgActionTest, WorksForOneArgIntArg0) {
   const Action<int(int)> a = ReturnArg<0>();
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a.Perform(make_tuple(5)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a.Perform(std::make_tuple(5)));
 }
 
 TEST(ReturnArgActionTest, WorksForMultiArgBoolArg0) {
   const Action<bool(bool, bool, bool)> a = ReturnArg<0>();
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(true, false, false)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, false, false)));
 }
 
 TEST(ReturnArgActionTest, WorksForMultiArgStringArg2) {
   const Action<std::string(int, int, std::string, int)> a = ReturnArg<2>();
-  EXPECT_EQ("seven", a.Perform(make_tuple(5, 6, std::string("seven"), 8)));
+  EXPECT_EQ("seven", a.Perform(std::make_tuple(5, 6, std::string("seven"), 8)));
 }
 
 TEST(SaveArgActionTest, WorksForSameType) {
   int result = 0;
   const Action<void(int n)> a1 = SaveArg<0>(&result);
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(5));
   EXPECT_EQ(5, result);
 }
 
 TEST(SaveArgActionTest, WorksForCompatibleType) {
   int result = 0;
   const Action<void(bool, char)> a1 = SaveArg<1>(&result);
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 'a'));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 'a'));
   EXPECT_EQ('a', result);
 }
 
@@ -519,7 +516,7 @@ TEST(SaveArgPointeeActionTest, WorksForSameType) {
   int result = 0;
   const int value = 5;
   const Action<void(const int*)> a1 = SaveArgPointee<0>(&result);
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(&value));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(&value));
   EXPECT_EQ(5, result);
 }
 
@@ -527,36 +524,28 @@ TEST(SaveArgPointeeActionTest, WorksForCompatibleType) {
   int result = 0;
   char value = 'a';
   const Action<void(bool, char*)> a1 = SaveArgPointee<1>(&result);
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, &value));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, &value));
   EXPECT_EQ('a', result);
 }
 
-TEST(SaveArgPointeeActionTest, WorksForLinkedPtr) {
-  int result = 0;
-  linked_ptr<int> value(new int(5));
-  const Action<void(linked_ptr<int>)> a1 = SaveArgPointee<0>(&result);
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(value));
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, result);
-}
-
 TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksForSameType) {
   int value = 0;
   const Action<void(int&)> a1 = SetArgReferee<0>(1);
-  a1.Perform(tuple<int&>(value));
+  a1.Perform(std::tuple<int&>(value));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, value);
 }
 
 TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksForCompatibleType) {
   int value = 0;
   const Action<void(int, int&)> a1 = SetArgReferee<1>('a');
-  a1.Perform(tuple<int, int&>(0, value));
+  a1.Perform(std::tuple<int, int&>(0, value));
   EXPECT_EQ('a', value);
 }
 
 TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksWithExtraArguments) {
   int value = 0;
   const Action<void(bool, int, int&, const char*)> a1 = SetArgReferee<2>('a');
-  a1.Perform(tuple<bool, int, int&, const char*>(true, 0, value, "hi"));
+  a1.Perform(std::tuple<bool, int, int&, const char*>(true, 0, value, "hi"));
   EXPECT_EQ('a', value);
 }
 
@@ -583,7 +572,7 @@ TEST(DeleteArgActionTest, OneArg) {
   DeletionTester* t = new DeletionTester(&is_deleted);
   const Action<void(DeletionTester*)> a1 = DeleteArg<0>();      // NOLINT
   EXPECT_FALSE(is_deleted);
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(t));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(t));
   EXPECT_TRUE(is_deleted);
 }
 
@@ -593,7 +582,7 @@ TEST(DeleteArgActionTest, TenArgs) {
   const Action<void(bool, int, int, const char*, bool,
                     int, int, int, int, DeletionTester*)> a1 = DeleteArg<9>();
   EXPECT_FALSE(is_deleted);
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5, 6, CharPtr("hi"), false, 7, 8, 9, 10, t));
+  a1.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, 5, 6, CharPtr("hi"), false, 7, 8, 9, 10, t));
   EXPECT_TRUE(is_deleted);
 }
 
@@ -601,19 +590,19 @@ TEST(DeleteArgActionTest, TenArgs) {
 
 TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInVoidFunction) {
   const Action<void(int n)> a = Throw('a');
-  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple(0)), char);
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(std::make_tuple(0)), char);
 }
 
 class MyException {};
 
 TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInNonVoidFunction) {
   const Action<double(char ch)> a = Throw(MyException());
-  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple('0')), MyException);
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(std::make_tuple('0')), MyException);
 }
 
 TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInNullaryFunction) {
   const Action<double()> a = Throw(MyException());
-  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple()), MyException);
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(std::make_tuple()), MyException);
 }
 
 #endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
@@ -629,7 +618,7 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArray) {
   int* pn = n;
   char ch[4] = {};
   char* pch = ch;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pn, pch));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, pn, pch));
   EXPECT_EQ(1, n[0]);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, n[1]);
   EXPECT_EQ(3, n[2]);
@@ -644,7 +633,7 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArray) {
   a = SetArrayArgument<2>(letters.begin(), letters.end());
   std::fill_n(n, 4, 0);
   std::fill_n(ch, 4, '\0');
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pn, pch));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, pn, pch));
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n[0]);
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n[1]);
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n[2]);
@@ -663,7 +652,7 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithEmptyRange) {
 
   int n[4] = {};
   int* pn = n;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pn));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, pn));
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n[0]);
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n[1]);
   EXPECT_EQ(0, n[2]);
@@ -679,7 +668,7 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithConvertibleType) {
 
   int codes[4] = { 111, 222, 333, 444 };
   int* pcodes = codes;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, pcodes));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, pcodes));
   EXPECT_EQ(97, codes[0]);
   EXPECT_EQ(98, codes[1]);
   EXPECT_EQ(99, codes[2]);
@@ -693,17 +682,17 @@ TEST(SetArrayArgumentTest, SetsTheNthArrayWithIteratorArgument) {
   Action<MyFunction> a = SetArrayArgument<1>(letters.begin(), letters.end());
 
   std::string s;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(true, back_inserter(s)));
+  a.Perform(std::make_tuple(true, back_inserter(s)));
   EXPECT_EQ(letters, s);
 }
 
 TEST(ReturnPointeeTest, Works) {
   int n = 42;
   const Action<int()> a = ReturnPointee(&n);
-  EXPECT_EQ(42, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 
   n = 43;
-  EXPECT_EQ(43, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(43, a.Perform(std::make_tuple()));
 }
 
 }  // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
index dce66423..455e591c 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@
 // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
 // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 
-
-#include "gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h"
+#include "gmock/gmock-nice-strict.h"
 
 #include <string>
 #include <utility>
@@ -114,23 +113,22 @@ class MockBar {
   GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockBar);
 };
 
-#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11
 
 class MockBaz {
  public:
   class MoveOnly {
+   public:
     MoveOnly() = default;
 
     MoveOnly(const MoveOnly&) = delete;
-    operator=(const MoveOnly&) = delete;
+    MoveOnly& operator=(const MoveOnly&) = delete;
 
     MoveOnly(MoveOnly&&) = default;
-    operator=(MoveOnly&&) = default;
+    MoveOnly& operator=(MoveOnly&&) = default;
   };
 
   MockBaz(MoveOnly) {}
-}
-#endif  // GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_
+};
 
 #if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION
 
@@ -184,6 +182,13 @@ TEST(RawMockTest, InfoForUninterestingCall) {
   GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag;
 }
 
+TEST(RawMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
+  MockFoo raw_foo;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Mock::IsNaggy(&raw_foo));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsNice(&raw_foo));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsStrict(&raw_foo));
+}
+
 // Tests that a nice mock generates no warning for uninteresting calls.
 TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCall) {
   NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
@@ -285,14 +290,10 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, AllowLeak) {
   leaked->DoThis();
 }
 
-#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_
-
 TEST(NiceMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) {
-  NiceMock<MockBaz> nice_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly());
+  NiceMock<MockBaz> nice_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly{});
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_
-
 #if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 // Tests that NiceMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
 // class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock).  We had to work around an
@@ -309,6 +310,13 @@ TEST(NiceMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
 }
 #endif  // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 
+TEST(NiceMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
+  NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsNaggy(&nice_foo));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Mock::IsNice(&nice_foo));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsStrict(&nice_foo));
+}
+
 #if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION
 
 // Tests that a naggy mock generates warnings for uninteresting calls.
@@ -393,14 +401,10 @@ TEST(NaggyMockTest, AllowLeak) {
   leaked->DoThis();
 }
 
-#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_
-
 TEST(NaggyMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) {
-  NaggyMock<MockBaz> naggy_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly());
+  NaggyMock<MockBaz> naggy_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly{});
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_
-
 #if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 // Tests that NaggyMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
 // class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock).  We had to work around an
@@ -417,6 +421,13 @@ TEST(NaggyMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
 }
 #endif  // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 
+TEST(NaggyMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
+  NaggyMock<MockFoo> naggy_foo;
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Mock::IsNaggy(&naggy_foo));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsNice(&naggy_foo));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsStrict(&naggy_foo));
+}
+
 // Tests that a strict mock allows expected calls.
 TEST(StrictMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) {
   StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
@@ -482,14 +493,10 @@ TEST(StrictMockTest, AllowLeak) {
   leaked->DoThis();
 }
 
-#if GTEST_GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_
-
 TEST(StrictMockTest, MoveOnlyConstructor) {
-  StrictMock<MockBaz> strict_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly());
+  StrictMock<MockBaz> strict_baz(MockBaz::MoveOnly{});
 }
 
-#endif  // GTEST_LANG_CXX11 && GTEST_HAS_STD_MOVE_
-
 #if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 // Tests that StrictMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined
 // class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock).  We had to work around an
@@ -506,5 +513,12 @@ TEST(StrictMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) {
 }
 #endif  // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE
 
+TEST(StrictMockTest, IsNaggy_IsNice_IsStrict) {
+  StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsNaggy(&strict_foo));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(Mock::IsNice(&strict_foo));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Mock::IsStrict(&strict_foo));
+}
+
 }  // namespace gmock_nice_strict_test
 }  // namespace testing
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-pp-string_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-pp-string_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6f66cf15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-pp-string_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+// Copyright 2018, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the internal preprocessor macro library.
+#include "gmock/internal/gmock-pp.h"
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "gmock/gmock.h"
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace {
+
+// Matcher to verify that to strings are identical up to whitespace
+// Not 100% correct, because it treats "AB" as equal to "A B".
+::testing::Matcher<const std::string&> SameExceptSpaces(const std::string& s) {
+  auto remove_spaces = [](std::string to_split) {
+    to_split.erase(std::remove(to_split.begin(), to_split.end(), ' '),
+                   to_split.end());
+    return to_split;
+  };
+  return ::testing::ResultOf(remove_spaces, remove_spaces(s));
+}
+
+// Verify that a macro expands to a given text. Ignores whitespace difference.
+// In MSVC, GMOCK_PP_STRINGIZE() returns nothing, rather than "". So concatenate
+// with an empty string.
+#define EXPECT_EXPANSION(Result, Macro) \
+  EXPECT_THAT("" GMOCK_PP_STRINGIZE(Macro), SameExceptSpaces(Result))
+
+TEST(Macros, Cat) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("14", GMOCK_PP_CAT(1, 4));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("+=", GMOCK_PP_CAT(+, =));
+}
+
+TEST(Macros, Narg) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_NARG());
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_NARG(x));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("2", GMOCK_PP_NARG(x, y));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("3", GMOCK_PP_NARG(x, y, z));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("4", GMOCK_PP_NARG(x, y, z, w));
+
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_NARG0());
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_NARG0(x));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("2", GMOCK_PP_NARG0(x, y));
+}
+
+TEST(Macros, Comma) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA());
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA(, ));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA((, )));
+}
+
+TEST(Macros, IsEmpty) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY());
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(, ));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(a));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(()));
+
+#define GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_IS_EMPTY_TEST_1
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_IS_EMPTY_TEST_1));
+}
+
+TEST(Macros, If) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_IF(1, 1, 2));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("2", GMOCK_PP_IF(0, 1, 2));
+}
+
+TEST(Macros, HeadTail) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_HEAD(1));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_HEAD(1, 2));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_HEAD(1, 2, 3));
+
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("", GMOCK_PP_TAIL(1));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("2", GMOCK_PP_TAIL(1, 2));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("2", GMOCK_PP_HEAD(GMOCK_PP_TAIL(1, 2, 3)));
+}
+
+TEST(Macros, Parentheses) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS(sss));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS(sss()));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS(sss() sss));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS((sss)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS((sss)ss));
+
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS(sss));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS(sss()));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS(sss() sss));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS((sss)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("0", GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS((sss)ss));
+
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1 + 1", GMOCK_PP_REMOVE_PARENS((1 + 1)));
+}
+
+TEST(Macros, Increment) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("1", GMOCK_PP_INC(0));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("2", GMOCK_PP_INC(1));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("3", GMOCK_PP_INC(2));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("4", GMOCK_PP_INC(3));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("5", GMOCK_PP_INC(4));
+
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("16", GMOCK_PP_INC(15));
+}
+
+#define JOINER_CAT(a, b) a##b
+#define JOINER(_N, _Data, _Elem) JOINER_CAT(_Data, _N) = _Elem
+
+TEST(Macros, Repeat) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("", GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 0));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=", GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 1));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1=", GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 2));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2=", GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 3));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3=", GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 4));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4=", GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 5));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5=", GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 6));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6=",
+                   GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 7));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7=",
+                   GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 8));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7= X8=",
+                   GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 9));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7= X8= X9=",
+                   GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 10));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7= X8= X9= X10=",
+                   GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 11));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7= X8= X9= X10= X11=",
+                   GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 12));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7= X8= X9= X10= X11= X12=",
+                   GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 13));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7= X8= X9= X10= X11= X12= X13=",
+      GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 14));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0= X1= X2= X3= X4= X5= X6= X7= X8= X9= X10= X11= X12= X13= X14=",
+      GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(JOINER, X, 15));
+}
+TEST(Macros, ForEach) {
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("", GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, ()));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a", GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b", GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b X2=c", GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d",
+                   GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e",
+                   GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f",
+                   GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g",
+                   GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h",
+                   GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION("X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h X8=i",
+                   GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h X8=i X9=j",
+      GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h X8=i X9=j X10=k",
+      GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h X8=i X9=j X10=k X11=l",
+      GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h X8=i X9=j X10=k X11=l X12=m",
+      GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h X8=i X9=j X10=k X11=l X12=m "
+      "X13=n",
+      GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X, (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n)));
+  EXPECT_EXPANSION(
+      "X0=a X1=b X2=c X3=d X4=e X5=f X6=g X7=h X8=i X9=j X10=k X11=l X12=m "
+      "X13=n X14=o",
+      GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(JOINER, X,
+                        (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o)));
+}
+
+}  // namespace
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-pp_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-pp_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7387d398
--- /dev/null
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-pp_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+#include "gmock/internal/gmock-pp.h"
+
+// Static assertions.
+namespace testing {
+namespace internal {
+namespace gmockpp {
+
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_CAT(1, 4) == 14, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_INTERNAL_16TH(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
+                                              12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) == 16,
+              "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG() == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG(x) == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG(x, y) == 2, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG(x, y, z) == 3, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG(x, y, z, w) == 4, "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA(), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA(b, ), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA((, )), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(, ), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(a), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(()), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IF(1, 1, 2) == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IF(0, 1, 2) == 2, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG0(x) == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG0(x, y) == 2, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_HEAD(1) == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_HEAD(1, 2) == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_HEAD(1, 2, 3) == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_TAIL(1, 2) == 2, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_HEAD(GMOCK_PP_TAIL(1, 2, 3)) == 2, "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS(sss), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS(sss()), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS(sss() sss), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS((sss)), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IS_BEGIN_PARENS((sss)ss), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS(sss), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS(sss()), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS(sss() sss), "");
+static_assert(!GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS((sss)ss), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_REMOVE_PARENS((1 + 1)) * 2 == 3, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_INC(4) == 5, "");
+
+template <class... Args>
+struct Test {
+  static constexpr int kArgs = sizeof...(Args);
+};
+#define GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_TYPE_TEST(_i, _Data, _element) \
+  GMOCK_PP_COMMA_IF(_i) _element
+static_assert(Test<GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_TYPE_TEST, ~,
+                                     (int, float, double, char))>::kArgs == 4,
+              "");
+#define GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST_1(_x) 1
+#define GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST_2(_x, _y) 2
+#define GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST_3(_x, _y, _z) 3
+
+#define GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST(...) \
+  GMOCK_PP_VARIADIC_CALL(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST_, __VA_ARGS__)
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST(x, y) == 2, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST(silly) == 1, "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_VAR_TEST(x, y, z) == 3, "");
+
+// TODO(iserna): The following asserts fail in --config=lexan.
+#define GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_IS_EMPTY_TEST_1
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_IS_EMPTY_TEST_1), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IS_ENCLOSED_PARENS((sss)), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_IS_EMPTY(GMOCK_PP_TAIL(1)), "");
+static_assert(GMOCK_PP_NARG0() == 0, "");
+
+}  // namespace gmockpp
+}  // namespace internal
+}  // namespace testing
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
index 65c9fcc4..557abaea 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 
 #include "gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h"
 
+#include <memory>
 #include <ostream>  // NOLINT
 #include <sstream>
 #include <string>
@@ -99,7 +100,6 @@ using testing::internal::kFail;
 using testing::internal::kInfoVerbosity;
 using testing::internal::kWarn;
 using testing::internal::kWarningVerbosity;
-using testing::internal::linked_ptr;
 
 #if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION
 using testing::HasSubstr;
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ class ReferenceHoldingMock {
  public:
   ReferenceHoldingMock() {}
 
-  MOCK_METHOD1(AcceptReference, void(linked_ptr<MockA>*));
+  MOCK_METHOD1(AcceptReference, void(std::shared_ptr<MockA>*));
 
  private:
   GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(ReferenceHoldingMock);
@@ -1952,17 +1952,17 @@ TEST(DeletingMockEarlyTest, Failure2) {
 class EvenNumberCardinality : public CardinalityInterface {
  public:
   // Returns true iff call_count calls will satisfy this cardinality.
-  virtual bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const {
+  bool IsSatisfiedByCallCount(int call_count) const override {
     return call_count % 2 == 0;
   }
 
   // Returns true iff call_count calls will saturate this cardinality.
-  virtual bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int /* call_count */) const {
+  bool IsSaturatedByCallCount(int /* call_count */) const override {
     return false;
   }
 
   // Describes self to an ostream.
-  virtual void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const {
+  void DescribeTo(::std::ostream* os) const override {
     *os << "called even number of times";
   }
 };
@@ -2023,7 +2023,9 @@ class VerboseFlagPreservingFixture : public testing::Test {
   VerboseFlagPreservingFixture()
       : saved_verbose_flag_(GMOCK_FLAG(verbose)) {}
 
-  ~VerboseFlagPreservingFixture() { GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_verbose_flag_; }
+  ~VerboseFlagPreservingFixture() override {
+    GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_verbose_flag_;
+  }
 
  private:
   const std::string saved_verbose_flag_;
@@ -2619,7 +2621,7 @@ TEST(VerifyAndClearTest, DoesNotAffectOtherMockObjects) {
 
 TEST(VerifyAndClearTest,
      DestroyingChainedMocksDoesNotDeadlockThroughExpectations) {
-  linked_ptr<MockA> a(new MockA);
+  std::shared_ptr<MockA> a(new MockA);
   ReferenceHoldingMock test_mock;
 
   // EXPECT_CALL stores a reference to a inside test_mock.
@@ -2639,7 +2641,7 @@ TEST(VerifyAndClearTest,
 
 TEST(VerifyAndClearTest,
      DestroyingChainedMocksDoesNotDeadlockThroughDefaultAction) {
-  linked_ptr<MockA> a(new MockA);
+  std::shared_ptr<MockA> a(new MockA);
   ReferenceHoldingMock test_mock;
 
   // ON_CALL stores a reference to a inside test_mock.
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h b/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h
index e85f7502..175d2bdd 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_link_test.h
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ TEST(LinkTest, TestThrow) {
   Mock mock;
 
   EXPECT_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(_)).WillOnce(Throw(42));
-  EXPECT_THROW(mock.VoidFromString(NULL), int);
+  EXPECT_THROW(mock.VoidFromString(nullptr), int);
 }
 #endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 
diff --git a/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc b/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc
index 9ae0b1e5..20725d69 100644
--- a/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc
+++ b/googlemock/test/gmock_stress_test.cc
@@ -60,87 +60,8 @@ void JoinAndDelete(ThreadWithParam<T>* t) {
   delete t;
 }
 
-using internal::linked_ptr;
-
-// Helper classes for testing using linked_ptr concurrently.
-
-class Base {
- public:
-  explicit Base(int a_x) : x_(a_x) {}
-  virtual ~Base() {}
-  int x() const { return x_; }
- private:
-  int x_;
-};
-
-class Derived1 : public Base {
- public:
-  Derived1(int a_x, int a_y) : Base(a_x), y_(a_y) {}
-  int y() const { return y_; }
- private:
-  int y_;
-};
-
-class Derived2 : public Base {
- public:
-  Derived2(int a_x, int a_z) : Base(a_x), z_(a_z) {}
-  int z() const { return z_; }
- private:
-  int z_;
-};
-
-linked_ptr<Derived1> pointer1(new Derived1(1, 2));
-linked_ptr<Derived2> pointer2(new Derived2(3, 4));
-
 struct Dummy {};
 
-// Tests that we can copy from a linked_ptr and read it concurrently.
-void TestConcurrentCopyAndReadLinkedPtr(Dummy /* dummy */) {
-  // Reads pointer1 and pointer2 while they are being copied from in
-  // another thread.
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, pointer1->x());
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, pointer1->y());
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, pointer2->x());
-  EXPECT_EQ(4, pointer2->z());
-
-  // Copies from pointer1.
-  linked_ptr<Derived1> p1(pointer1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, p1->x());
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, p1->y());
-
-  // Assigns from pointer2 where the LHS was empty.
-  linked_ptr<Base> p2;
-  p2 = pointer1;
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, p2->x());
-
-  // Assigns from pointer2 where the LHS was not empty.
-  p2 = pointer2;
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, p2->x());
-}
-
-const linked_ptr<Derived1> p0(new Derived1(1, 2));
-
-// Tests that we can concurrently modify two linked_ptrs that point to
-// the same object.
-void TestConcurrentWriteToEqualLinkedPtr(Dummy /* dummy */) {
-  // p1 and p2 point to the same, shared thing.  One thread resets p1.
-  // Another thread assigns to p2.  This will cause the same
-  // underlying "ring" to be updated concurrently.
-  linked_ptr<Derived1> p1(p0);
-  linked_ptr<Derived1> p2(p0);
-
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, p1->x());
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, p1->y());
-
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, p2->x());
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, p2->y());
-
-  p1.reset();
-  p2 = p0;
-
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, p2->x());
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, p2->y());
-}
 
 // Tests that different mock objects can be used in their respective
 // threads.  This should generate no Google Test failure.
@@ -275,8 +196,6 @@ void TestPartiallyOrderedExpectationsWithThreads(Dummy /* dummy */) {
 // Tests using Google Mock constructs in many threads concurrently.
 TEST(StressTest, CanUseGMockWithThreads) {
   void (*test_routines[])(Dummy dummy) = {
-    &TestConcurrentCopyAndReadLinkedPtr,
-    &TestConcurrentWriteToEqualLinkedPtr,
     &TestConcurrentMockObjects,
     &TestConcurrentCallsOnSameObject,
     &TestPartiallyOrderedExpectationsWithThreads,