diff options
| author | gdisirio <gdisirio@35acf78f-673a-0410-8e92-d51de3d6d3f4> | 2008-11-15 11:08:53 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | gdisirio <gdisirio@35acf78f-673a-0410-8e92-d51de3d6d3f4> | 2008-11-15 11:08:53 +0000 |
| commit | c247b6b26c704931435490ce51fe42da7bf67be5 (patch) | |
| tree | 020ef423bc3471ec7ea28787b590d9ce4fa613ce | |
| parent | 554e9da84ac99455e812d366418dc508eb51f09d (diff) | |
| download | ChibiOS-c247b6b26c704931435490ce51fe42da7bf67be5.tar.gz ChibiOS-c247b6b26c704931435490ce51fe42da7bf67be5.tar.bz2 ChibiOS-c247b6b26c704931435490ce51fe42da7bf67be5.zip | |
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/chibios/svn/trunk@512 35acf78f-673a-0410-8e92-d51de3d6d3f4
| -rw-r--r-- | demos/MSP430-MSP430x1611-GCC/chconf.h | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/reports/MSP430F1611-0.75.txt | 53 |
2 files changed, 33 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/demos/MSP430-MSP430x1611-GCC/chconf.h b/demos/MSP430-MSP430x1611-GCC/chconf.h index 785abb912..c6ca7420a 100644 --- a/demos/MSP430-MSP430x1611-GCC/chconf.h +++ b/demos/MSP430-MSP430x1611-GCC/chconf.h @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ /** Configuration option: enforces the use of the C-runtime \p malloc() and
* \p free() functions as backend for the system heap allocator.*/
-#define CH_USE_MALLOC_HEAP
+//#define CH_USE_MALLOC_HEAP
/** Configuration option: if specified then the memory pools allocator APIs
* are included in the kernel.*/
diff --git a/docs/reports/MSP430F1611-0.75.txt b/docs/reports/MSP430F1611-0.75.txt index 2bd16df83..7e6e39ee8 100644 --- a/docs/reports/MSP430F1611-0.75.txt +++ b/docs/reports/MSP430F1611-0.75.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ ***************************************************************************
-Kernel: ChibiOS/RT 0.7.3
+Kernel: ChibiOS/RT 0.8.0
Compiler: GCC 3.2.3 (MSPGCC)
Options: -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
Settings: MCLK=DCOCLK 750Khz
@@ -27,49 +27,60 @@ Settings: MCLK=DCOCLK 750Khz --- Test Case 7 (Mutexes, priority inheritance, complex case)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 8 (Messages, dispatch test)
+--- Test Case 8 (CondVar, signal test)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 9 (Heap, allocation and fragmentation test)
---- Size : 0 bytes, fragmented, test skipped
+--- Test Case 9 (CondVar, broadcast test)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 10 (Memory Pools, allocation and enqueuing test)
+--- Test Case 10 (Messages, dispatch test)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 11 (Dynamic APIs, threads creation from heap)
+--- Test Case 11 (Events, wait and broadcast)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 12 (Dynamic APIs, threads creation from memory pool)
+--- Test Case 12 (Heap, allocation and fragmentation test)
+--- Size : 508 bytes, not fragmented
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 13 (Benchmark, context switch #1, optimal)
---- Score : 1892 msgs/S, 3784 ctxswc/S
+--- Test Case 13 (Memory Pools, allocation and enqueuing test)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 14 (Benchmark, context switch #2, empty ready list)
---- Score : 1577 msgs/S, 3154 ctxswc/S
+--- Test Case 14 (Dynamic APIs, threads creation from heap)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 15 (Benchmark, context switch #3, 4 threads in ready list)
---- Score : 1577 msgs/S, 3154 ctxswc/S
+--- Test Case 15 (Dynamic APIs, threads creation from memory pool)
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 16 (Benchmark, threads creation/termination, worst case)
---- Score : 1157 threads/S
+--- Test Case 16 (Benchmark, context switch #1, optimal)
+--- Score : 1887 msgs/S, 3774 ctxswc/S
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 17 (Benchmark, threads creation/termination, optimal)
---- Score : 1521 threads/S
+--- Test Case 17 (Benchmark, context switch #2, empty ready list)
+--- Score : 1573 msgs/S, 3146 ctxswc/S
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 18 (Benchmark, mass reschedulation, 5 threads)
+--- Test Case 18 (Benchmark, context switch #3, 4 threads in ready list)
+--- Score : 1573 msgs/S, 3146 ctxswc/S
+--- Result: SUCCESS
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- Test Case 19 (Benchmark, threads creation/termination, worst case)
+--- Score : 1166 threads/S
+--- Result: SUCCESS
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- Test Case 20 (Benchmark, threads creation/termination, optimal)
+--- Score : 1537 threads/S
+--- Result: SUCCESS
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- Test Case 21 (Benchmark, mass reschedulation, 5 threads)
--- Score : 498 reschedulations/S, 2988 ctxswc/S
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Test Case 19 (Benchmark, I/O Queues throughput)
+--- Test Case 22 (Benchmark, I/O Queues throughput)
--- Score : 5432 bytes/S
--- Result: SUCCESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Final result: SUCCESS
+--- Test Case 23 (Benchmark, virtual timers set/reset)
+--- Score : 5632 timers/S
+--- Result: SUCCESS
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|