From 1a392636a5b5694178d5f802efa9c220ff9dbabf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Crispin Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:24:34 +0000 Subject: ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach. The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target: * fixes wrong indentation * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body) * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files) * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds) Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz SVN-Revision: 46664 --- target/linux/ramips/dts/WHR-600D.dts | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'target/linux/ramips/dts/WHR-600D.dts') diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/WHR-600D.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WHR-600D.dts index 5e06060422..8e20859617 100644 --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/WHR-600D.dts +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WHR-600D.dts @@ -80,37 +80,37 @@ compatible = "gpio-leds"; power { - label = "buffalo:red:power"; + label = "whr-600d:red:power"; gpios = <&gpio0 7 1>; }; wifi { - label = "buffalo:green:wifi"; + label = "whr-600d:green:wifi"; gpios = <&gpio0 8 1>; }; power2 { - label = "buffalo:green:power"; + label = "whr-600d:green:power"; gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>; }; wifi2 { - label = "buffalo:orange:wifi"; + label = "whr-600d:orange:wifi"; gpios = <&gpio0 10 1>; }; internet { - label = "buffalo:green:internet"; + label = "whr-600d:green:internet"; gpios = <&gpio2 17 1>; }; router { - label = "buffalo:green:router"; + label = "whr-600d:green:router"; gpios = <&gpio2 18 1>; }; router2 { - label = "buffalo:orange:router"; + label = "whr-600d:orange:router"; gpios = <&gpio2 19 1>; }; }; -- cgit v1.2.3