From 5337af031e4cb489f0bfc0ee9becea4eb39fb2db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luka Perkov Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:10:38 +0000 Subject: imx6: fix sdma Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov SVN-Revision: 37752 --- ...ea-enable-to-build-host-support-as-module.patch | 3 ++- ...imx6sl-imx6qdl-use-the-same-SDMA-firmware.patch | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++ target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/101-sdma.patch | 22 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0004-ARM-dts-imx6sl-imx6qdl-use-the-same-SDMA-firmware.patch create mode 100644 target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/101-sdma.patch (limited to 'target/linux/imx6') diff --git a/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0003-usb-chipidea-enable-to-build-host-support-as-module.patch b/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0003-usb-chipidea-enable-to-build-host-support-as-module.patch index 9d922536eb..e5cac57d72 100644 --- a/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0003-usb-chipidea-enable-to-build-host-support-as-module.patch +++ b/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0003-usb-chipidea-enable-to-build-host-support-as-module.patch @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST does not need to depend on USB=y, USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST will work just fine even if USB=m is used. The depends line can be safely removed since USB_CHIPIDEA already depends on USB. -Tested on Gateworks imx6 Ventana board (gw-5400-a). +Tested on Gateworks imx6q Ventana board (gw-5400-a) and imx6dl Wandboard Dual +(imx6dl-wandboard). Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov --- diff --git a/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0004-ARM-dts-imx6sl-imx6qdl-use-the-same-SDMA-firmware.patch b/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0004-ARM-dts-imx6sl-imx6qdl-use-the-same-SDMA-firmware.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8b1126f865 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/0004-ARM-dts-imx6sl-imx6qdl-use-the-same-SDMA-firmware.patch @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +From 1e8efc07613f5fbf59ad7e580132c473a9b1d3eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Luka Perkov +Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:13:16 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: imx6sl/imx6qdl: use the same SDMA firmware + +Patch for SDMA firmware sent by Fabio Estevam in January [1] didn't make +upstream. Nonetheless, it was pointed out that all imx6 use the same SDMA +firmware [2]. Reflect this fact in appropriate .dtsi files. + +[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/143025.html +[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/143150.html + +Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov +--- + arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 2 +- + arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi | 2 +- + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi ++++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi +@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ + interrupts = <0 2 0x04>; + clocks = <&clks 155>, <&clks 155>; + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb"; +- fsl,sdma-ram-script-name = "imx/sdma/sdma-imx6q.bin"; ++ fsl,sdma-ram-script-name = "imx/sdma/sdma-imx6.bin"; + }; + }; + diff --git a/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/101-sdma.patch b/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/101-sdma.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2c69b93bed --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/imx6/patches-3.10/101-sdma.patch @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +From 2714c54667f4e9267e7ee9a7f27fa9184d570459 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Luka Perkov +Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:14:39 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH 3/3] sdma: keep the firmware binaries in firmware directory + +Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov +--- + arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 2 +- + arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi | 2 +- + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi ++++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi +@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ + interrupts = <0 2 0x04>; + clocks = <&clks 155>, <&clks 155>; + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb"; +- fsl,sdma-ram-script-name = "imx/sdma/sdma-imx6.bin"; ++ fsl,sdma-ram-script-name = "sdma-imx6.bin"; + }; + }; + -- cgit v1.2.3