diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch | 74 |
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch b/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..36e82f56dd --- /dev/null +++ b/toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645 +http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470 + +2011-12-03 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> + + PR ld/13470 + * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive + change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment. + * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise. + +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c,v +retrieving revision 1.302.2.1 +retrieving revision 1.302.2.2 +--- a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c ++++ b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c +@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; + edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed; + +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) +- return; +- + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) + { + if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL) +@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; + } + ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS ++ code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the ++ DIR sym here. */ ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) ++ return; ++ + /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to + the symbol which just became indirect. */ + edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount; +--- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c ++++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c +@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b + edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak; + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt; + +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */ +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) +- return; +- + /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */ + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL) + { +@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL; + } + ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all, ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS ++ code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the ++ DIR sym here. */ ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect) ++ return; ++ + /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the + symbol which just became indirect. */ + if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL) |