diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0246-net-mscc-ocelot-limit-vlan-ingress-filtering-to-actu.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0246-net-mscc-ocelot-limit-vlan-ingress-filtering-to-actu.patch | 28 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0246-net-mscc-ocelot-limit-vlan-ingress-filtering-to-actu.patch b/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0246-net-mscc-ocelot-limit-vlan-ingress-filtering-to-actu.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 532db74c83..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/layerscape/patches-5.4/701-net-0246-net-mscc-ocelot-limit-vlan-ingress-filtering-to-actu.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -From acc105226493e7cfdb6e72d130c36f21e951fc1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> -Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 15:02:55 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH] net: mscc: ocelot: limit vlan ingress filtering to actual - number of ports - -The VSC7514 switch (Ocelot) is a 10-port device, while VSC9959 (Felix) -is 6-port. Therefore the VLAN filtering mask would be out of bounds when -calling for this new switch. Fix that. - -Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> -Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> ---- - drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c | 3 ++- - 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - ---- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c -+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c -@@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ static void ocelot_vlan_init(struct ocel - /* Set vlan ingress filter mask to all ports but the CPU port by - * default. - */ -- ocelot_write(ocelot, GENMASK(9, 0), ANA_VLANMASK); -+ ocelot_write(ocelot, GENMASK(ocelot->num_phys_ports - 1, 0), -+ ANA_VLANMASK); - - for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++) { - ocelot_write_gix(ocelot, 0, REW_PORT_VLAN_CFG, port); |