kernel: bump 4.14 to 4.14.154

Refreshed all patches.

Altered patches:
- 902-debloat_proc.patch
- 040-dmaengine-qcom-bam-Process-multiple-pending-descript.patch
- 807-usb-support-layerscape.patch
- 809-flexcan-support-layerscape.patch
- 816-pcie-support-layerscape.patch

Remove upstreamed:
- 303-spi-nor-enable-4B-opcodes-for-mx66l51235l.patch

New symbols:
X86_INTEL_MPX
X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
CONFIG_X86_INTEL_TSX_MODE_OFF
X86_INTEL_TSX_MODE_ON
X86_INTEL_TSX_MODE_AUTO
SGL_ALLOC

Compile-tested on: ar71xx, cns3xxx, imx6, x86_64
Runtime-tested on: ar71xx, cns3xxx, imx6

Signed-off-by: Koen Vandeputte <koen.vandeputte@ncentric.com>

2 files changed, 35 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/040-dmaengine-qcom-bam-Process-multiple-pending-descript.patch b/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/040-dmaengine-qcom-bam-Process-multiple-pending-descript.patch
index 881d08c7e5..164b3fb48e 100644
--- a/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/040-dmaengine-qcom-bam-Process-multiple-pending-descript.patch
+++ b/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/040-dmaengine-qcom-bam-Process-multiple-pending-descript.patch
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  
  	async_desc->num_desc = num_alloc;
  	async_desc->curr_desc = async_desc->desc;
-@@ -685,14 +688,16 @@ err_out:
+@@ -685,29 +688,16 @@ err_out:
  static int bam_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
  {
  	struct bam_chan *bchan = to_bam_chan(chan);
@@ -142,17 +142,32 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  
  	/* remove all transactions, including active transaction */
  	spin_lock_irqsave(&bchan->vc.lock, flag);
+-	/*
+-	 * If we have transactions queued, then some might be committed to the
+-	 * hardware in the desc fifo.  The only way to reset the desc fifo is
+-	 * to do a hardware reset (either by pipe or the entire block).
+-	 * bam_chan_init_hw() will trigger a pipe reset, and also reinit the
+-	 * pipe.  If the pipe is left disabled (default state after pipe reset)
+-	 * and is accessed by a connected hardware engine, a fatal error in
+-	 * the BAM will occur.  There is a small window where this could happen
+-	 * with bam_chan_init_hw(), but it is assumed that the caller has
+-	 * stopped activity on any attached hardware engine.  Make sure to do
+-	 * this first so that the BAM hardware doesn't cause memory corruption
+-	 * by accessing freed resources.
+-	 */
 -	if (bchan->curr_txd) {
+-		bam_chan_init_hw(bchan, bchan->curr_txd->dir);
 -		list_add(&bchan->curr_txd->vd.node, &bchan->vc.desc_issued);
 -		bchan->curr_txd = NULL;
-+	list_for_each_entry_safe(async_desc, tmp,
-+				 &bchan->desc_list, desc_node) {
-+		list_add(&async_desc->vd.node, &bchan->vc.desc_issued);
-+		list_del(&async_desc->desc_node);
- 	}
+-	}
++        list_for_each_entry_safe(async_desc, tmp,
++                                &bchan->desc_list, desc_node) {
++                list_add(&async_desc->vd.node, &bchan->vc.desc_issued);
++                list_del(&async_desc->desc_node);
  
  	vchan_get_all_descriptors(&bchan->vc, &head);
-@@ -764,9 +769,9 @@ static int bam_resume(struct dma_chan *c
+ 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bchan->vc.lock, flag);
+@@ -778,9 +768,9 @@ static int bam_resume(struct dma_chan *c
   */
  static u32 process_channel_irqs(struct bam_device *bdev)
  {
@@ -164,7 +179,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  
  	srcs = readl_relaxed(bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_IRQ_SRCS_EE));
  
-@@ -786,27 +791,40 @@ static u32 process_channel_irqs(struct b
+@@ -800,27 +790,40 @@ static u32 process_channel_irqs(struct b
  		writel_relaxed(pipe_stts, bam_addr(bdev, i, BAM_P_IRQ_CLR));
  
  		spin_lock_irqsave(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
@@ -214,7 +229,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  		}
  
  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
-@@ -868,6 +886,7 @@ static enum dma_status bam_tx_status(str
+@@ -882,6 +885,7 @@ static enum dma_status bam_tx_status(str
  		struct dma_tx_state *txstate)
  {
  	struct bam_chan *bchan = to_bam_chan(chan);
@@ -222,7 +237,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  	struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
  	int ret;
  	size_t residue = 0;
-@@ -883,11 +902,17 @@ static enum dma_status bam_tx_status(str
+@@ -897,11 +901,17 @@ static enum dma_status bam_tx_status(str
  
  	spin_lock_irqsave(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
  	vd = vchan_find_desc(&bchan->vc, cookie);
@@ -244,7 +259,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
  
-@@ -928,63 +953,86 @@ static void bam_start_dma(struct bam_cha
+@@ -942,63 +952,86 @@ static void bam_start_dma(struct bam_cha
  {
  	struct virt_dma_desc *vd = vchan_next_desc(&bchan->vc);
  	struct bam_device *bdev = bchan->bdev;
@@ -311,19 +326,19 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
 +			async_desc->xfer_len = avail;
 +		else
 +			async_desc->xfer_len = async_desc->num_desc;
-+
+ 
+-	if (bchan->tail + async_desc->xfer_len > MAX_DESCRIPTORS) {
+-		u32 partial = MAX_DESCRIPTORS - bchan->tail;
 +		/* set any special flags on the last descriptor */
 +		if (async_desc->num_desc == async_desc->xfer_len)
 +			desc[async_desc->xfer_len - 1].flags |=
 +						cpu_to_le16(async_desc->flags);
  
--	if (bchan->tail + async_desc->xfer_len > MAX_DESCRIPTORS) {
--		u32 partial = MAX_DESCRIPTORS - bchan->tail;
-+		vd = vchan_next_desc(&bchan->vc);
- 
 -		memcpy(&fifo[bchan->tail], desc,
 -				partial * sizeof(struct bam_desc_hw));
 -		memcpy(fifo, &desc[partial], (async_desc->xfer_len - partial) *
++		vd = vchan_next_desc(&bchan->vc);
++
 +		dmaengine_desc_get_callback(&async_desc->vd.tx, &cb);
 +
 +		/*
@@ -367,7 +382,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  
  	/* ensure descriptor writes and dma start not reordered */
  	wmb();
-@@ -1013,7 +1061,7 @@ static void dma_tasklet(unsigned long da
+@@ -1027,7 +1060,7 @@ static void dma_tasklet(unsigned long da
  		bchan = &bdev->channels[i];
  		spin_lock_irqsave(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
  
@@ -376,7 +391,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  			bam_start_dma(bchan);
  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
  	}
-@@ -1034,7 +1082,7 @@ static void bam_issue_pending(struct dma
+@@ -1048,7 +1081,7 @@ static void bam_issue_pending(struct dma
  	spin_lock_irqsave(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
  
  	/* if work pending and idle, start a transaction */
@@ -385,7 +400,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
  		bam_start_dma(bchan);
  
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bchan->vc.lock, flags);
-@@ -1138,6 +1186,7 @@ static void bam_channel_init(struct bam_
+@@ -1152,6 +1185,7 @@ static void bam_channel_init(struct bam_
  
  	vchan_init(&bchan->vc, &bdev->common);
  	bchan->vc.desc_free = bam_dma_free_desc;
diff --git a/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/303-spi-nor-enable-4B-opcodes-for-mx25l25635f.patch b/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/303-spi-nor-enable-4B-opcodes-for-mx25l25635f.patch
index 28a04fae6d..01de239814 100644
--- a/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/303-spi-nor-enable-4B-opcodes-for-mx25l25635f.patch
+++ b/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/303-spi-nor-enable-4B-opcodes-for-mx25l25635f.patch
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 +	{ "mx25l25635f", INFO(0xc22019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
  	{ "mx25u25635f", INFO(0xc22539, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
  	{ "mx25l25655e", INFO(0xc22619, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
- 	{ "mx66l51235l", INFO(0xc2201a, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
+ 	{ "mx66l51235l", INFO(0xc2201a, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
 @@ -1201,11 +1202,12 @@ static const struct flash_info spi_nor_i
  	{ },
  };