From aaf1c600437e3c485fcc05f5fcb63e6e10d257f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward O'Callaghan Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:44:39 +1000 Subject: flashrom.c: Fix up stale FIXME comment when doit() was removed Once upon a time flashrom had a entry point function called doit(). Excise the last mention of it here so that we may never mention it again. BUG=none TEST=none Change-Id: I40d815b7154456c323b4230cd3fed2cc2e8e3641 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52365 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel Reviewed-by: Angel Pons --- flashrom.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/flashrom.c b/flashrom.c index c89abad6..056fc57e 100644 --- a/flashrom.c +++ b/flashrom.c @@ -2189,8 +2189,8 @@ int selfcheck(void) return ret; } -/* FIXME: This function signature needs to be improved once doit() has a better - * function signature. +/* FIXME: This function signature needs to be improved once prepare_flash_access() + * has a better function signature. */ static int chip_safety_check(const struct flashctx *flash, int force, int read_it, int write_it, int erase_it, int verify_it) -- cgit v1.2.3