| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Where this is safe, it can reduce latency and cpu overhead compared
with scheduling the idle vcpu to perform the same tasklet work.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
...rather than in softirq context. This is expected to avoid a lot of
subtle deadlocks relating to the fact that softirqs can interrupt a
scheduled vcpu.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com>
|
|
This is preparation for implementing tasklets in vcpu context rather
than softirq context. There is no change to the implementation of
tasklets in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com>
|