1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
From 27f699e578b1a72df89dfa3bc42e093a01dc8d10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 15:03:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: core: add support for fixed cells *layout*
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This adds support for the "fixed-layout" NVMEM layout binding. It allows
defining NVMEM cells in a layout DT node named "nvmem-layout".
While NVMEM subsystem supports layout drivers it has been discussed that
"fixed-layout" may actually be supperted internally. It's because:
1. It's a very basic layout
2. It allows sharing code with legacy syntax parsing
3. It's safer for soc_device_match() due to -EPROBE_DEFER
4. This will make the syntax transition easier
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230611140330.154222-26-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static int nvmem_validate_keepouts(struc
return 0;
}
-static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
+static int nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, struct device_node *np)
{
struct nvmem_layout *layout = nvmem->layout;
struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struc
const __be32 *addr;
int len, ret;
- for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
+ for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
struct nvmem_cell_info info = {0};
addr = of_get_property(child, "reg", &len);
@@ -742,6 +742,28 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struc
return 0;
}
+static int nvmem_add_cells_from_legacy_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
+{
+ return nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(nvmem, nvmem->dev.of_node);
+}
+
+static int nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
+{
+ struct device_node *layout_np;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ layout_np = of_nvmem_layout_get_container(nvmem);
+ if (!layout_np)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(layout_np, "fixed-layout"))
+ err = nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(nvmem, layout_np);
+
+ of_node_put(layout_np);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
int __nvmem_layout_register(struct nvmem_layout *layout, struct module *owner)
{
layout->owner = owner;
@@ -972,7 +994,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(cons
if (rval)
goto err_remove_cells;
- rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_of(nvmem);
+ rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_legacy_of(nvmem);
if (rval)
goto err_remove_cells;
@@ -982,6 +1004,10 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(cons
if (rval)
goto err_remove_cells;
+ rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout(nvmem);
+ if (rval)
+ goto err_remove_cells;
+
rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_layout(nvmem);
if (rval)
goto err_remove_cells;
|
