1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
From 107d54931df3c28d81648122e219bf0034ef4e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 21:19:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 25/29] mm: multi-gen LRU: shuffle should_run_aging()
Move should_run_aging() next to its only caller left.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-6-yuzhao@google.com
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michael Larabel <Michael@MichaelLarabel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4183,68 +4183,6 @@ done:
return true;
}
-static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
- struct scan_control *sc, bool can_swap, unsigned long *nr_to_scan)
-{
- int gen, type, zone;
- unsigned long old = 0;
- unsigned long young = 0;
- unsigned long total = 0;
- struct lru_gen_page *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
- DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
-
- /* whether this lruvec is completely out of cold pages */
- if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS > max_seq) {
- *nr_to_scan = 0;
- return true;
- }
-
- for (type = !can_swap; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
- unsigned long seq;
-
- for (seq = min_seq[type]; seq <= max_seq; seq++) {
- unsigned long size = 0;
-
- gen = lru_gen_from_seq(seq);
-
- for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++)
- size += max(READ_ONCE(lrugen->nr_pages[gen][type][zone]), 0L);
-
- total += size;
- if (seq == max_seq)
- young += size;
- else if (seq + MIN_NR_GENS == max_seq)
- old += size;
- }
- }
-
- /* try to scrape all its memory if this memcg was deleted */
- *nr_to_scan = mem_cgroup_online(memcg) ? (total >> sc->priority) : total;
-
- /*
- * The aging tries to be lazy to reduce the overhead, while the eviction
- * stalls when the number of generations reaches MIN_NR_GENS. Hence, the
- * ideal number of generations is MIN_NR_GENS+1.
- */
- if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS < max_seq)
- return false;
-
- /*
- * It's also ideal to spread pages out evenly, i.e., 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+1)
- * of the total number of pages for each generation. A reasonable range
- * for this average portion is [1/MIN_NR_GENS, 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+2)]. The
- * aging cares about the upper bound of hot pages, while the eviction
- * cares about the lower bound of cold pages.
- */
- if (young * MIN_NR_GENS > total)
- return true;
- if (old * (MIN_NR_GENS + 2) < total)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
static bool lruvec_is_sizable(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
int gen, type, zone;
@@ -4828,6 +4766,68 @@ retry:
return scanned;
}
+static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
+ struct scan_control *sc, bool can_swap, unsigned long *nr_to_scan)
+{
+ int gen, type, zone;
+ unsigned long old = 0;
+ unsigned long young = 0;
+ unsigned long total = 0;
+ struct lru_gen_page *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
+ DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
+
+ /* whether this lruvec is completely out of cold pages */
+ if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS > max_seq) {
+ *nr_to_scan = 0;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ for (type = !can_swap; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
+ unsigned long seq;
+
+ for (seq = min_seq[type]; seq <= max_seq; seq++) {
+ unsigned long size = 0;
+
+ gen = lru_gen_from_seq(seq);
+
+ for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++)
+ size += max(READ_ONCE(lrugen->nr_pages[gen][type][zone]), 0L);
+
+ total += size;
+ if (seq == max_seq)
+ young += size;
+ else if (seq + MIN_NR_GENS == max_seq)
+ old += size;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* try to scrape all its memory if this memcg was deleted */
+ *nr_to_scan = mem_cgroup_online(memcg) ? (total >> sc->priority) : total;
+
+ /*
+ * The aging tries to be lazy to reduce the overhead, while the eviction
+ * stalls when the number of generations reaches MIN_NR_GENS. Hence, the
+ * ideal number of generations is MIN_NR_GENS+1.
+ */
+ if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS < max_seq)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * It's also ideal to spread pages out evenly, i.e., 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+1)
+ * of the total number of pages for each generation. A reasonable range
+ * for this average portion is [1/MIN_NR_GENS, 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+2)]. The
+ * aging cares about the upper bound of hot pages, while the eviction
+ * cares about the lower bound of cold pages.
+ */
+ if (young * MIN_NR_GENS > total)
+ return true;
+ if (old * (MIN_NR_GENS + 2) < total)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* For future optimizations:
* 1. Defer try_to_inc_max_seq() to workqueues to reduce latency for memcg
|
