1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
From 0ff035231edca3713c3d0839c44e64a4ac41ef38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:09:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] leds: trigger: netdev: fix handling on interface rename
The NETDEV_CHANGENAME code is not "unneeded" like it is stated in commit
4cb6560514fa ("leds: trigger: netdev: fix refcnt leak on interface
rename").
The event was accidentally misinterpreted equivalent to
NETDEV_UNREGISTER, but should be equivalent to NETDEV_REGISTER.
This was the case in the original code from the openwrt project.
Otherwise, you are unable to set netdev led triggers for (non-existent)
netdevices, which has to be renamed. This is the case, for example, for
ppp interfaces in openwrt.
Fixes: 06f502f57d0d ("leds: trigger: Introduce a NETDEV trigger")
Fixes: 4cb6560514fa ("leds: trigger: netdev: fix refcnt leak on interface rename")
Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
---
drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
@@ -299,10 +299,12 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct not
notifier);
if (evt != NETDEV_UP && evt != NETDEV_DOWN && evt != NETDEV_CHANGE
- && evt != NETDEV_REGISTER && evt != NETDEV_UNREGISTER)
+ && evt != NETDEV_REGISTER && evt != NETDEV_UNREGISTER
+ && evt != NETDEV_CHANGENAME)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
if (!(dev == trigger_data->net_dev ||
+ (evt == NETDEV_CHANGENAME && !strcmp(dev->name, trigger_data->device_name)) ||
(evt == NETDEV_REGISTER && !strcmp(dev->name, trigger_data->device_name))))
return NOTIFY_DONE;
@@ -312,6 +314,7 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct not
clear_bit(NETDEV_LED_MODE_LINKUP, &trigger_data->mode);
switch (evt) {
+ case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
case NETDEV_REGISTER:
if (trigger_data->net_dev)
dev_put(trigger_data->net_dev);
|
