1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
From 2e9c468b513031e497d0133d7a2e396cb29d70c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 14:01:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Add missing clk_core_init_rate_req calls
Some callers of clk_core_round_rate_nolock() will initialize the
clk_rate_request structure by hand, missing a few parameters that leads
to inconsistencies in what drivers can expect from that structure.
Let's use clk_core_init_rate_req() everywhere to make sure it's built in
a consistent manner.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ unsigned long clk_hw_round_rate(struct c
int ret;
struct clk_rate_request req;
- req.rate = rate;
+ clk_core_init_rate_req(hw->core, &req, rate);
ret = clk_core_round_rate_nolock(hw->core, &req);
if (ret)
@@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, uns
if (clk->exclusive_count)
clk_core_rate_unprotect(clk->core);
- req.rate = rate;
+ clk_core_init_rate_req(clk->core, &req, rate);
ret = clk_core_round_rate_nolock(clk->core, &req);
@@ -2214,8 +2214,7 @@ static unsigned long clk_core_req_round_
if (cnt < 0)
return cnt;
- clk_core_get_boundaries(core, &req.min_rate, &req.max_rate);
- req.rate = req_rate;
+ clk_core_init_rate_req(core, &req, req_rate);
ret = clk_core_round_rate_nolock(core, &req);
|
