blob: 36d5bee123bd71a1824a7d6e4afc8f411b04a14e (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
|
From 4311a94e7598ca19311b04eb965556b5bb33accd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:22:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mac80211: fix rate mask reset
[ Upstream commit 1944015fe9c1d9fa5e9eb7ffbbb5ef8954d6753b ]
Coverity reported the strange "if (~...)" condition that's
always true. It suggested that ! was intended instead of ~,
but upon further analysis I'm convinced that what really was
intended was a comparison to 0xff/0xffff (in HT/VHT cases
respectively), since this indicates that all of the rates
are enabled.
Change the comparison accordingly.
I'm guessing this never really mattered because a reset to
not having a rate mask is basically equivalent to having a
mask that enables all rates.
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Fixes: 2ffbe6d33366 ("mac80211: fix and optimize MCS mask handling")
Fixes: b119ad6e726c ("mac80211: add rate mask logic for vht rates")
Reviewed-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212112213.36b38078f569.I8546a20c80bc1669058eb453e213630b846e107b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
net/mac80211/cfg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
@@ -2779,14 +2779,14 @@ static int ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask(st
continue;
for (j = 0; j < IEEE80211_HT_MCS_MASK_LEN; j++) {
- if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j]) {
+ if (sdata->rc_rateidx_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xff) {
sdata->rc_has_mcs_mask[i] = true;
break;
}
}
for (j = 0; j < NL80211_VHT_NSS_MAX; j++) {
- if (~sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j]) {
+ if (sdata->rc_rateidx_vht_mcs_mask[i][j] != 0xffff) {
sdata->rc_has_vht_mcs_mask[i] = true;
break;
}
|
