From ec780bdb9201182423688e38abd1f1959d32ae47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:37:53 +0200 Subject: kernel-5.4: backport latest patches for wireguard These are the latest patches that just landed upstream for 5.13, will be backported by Greg into 5.10 (because of stable@), and are now in the 5.4 backport branch of wireguard: https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/log/?h=backport-5.4.y Cc: Ilya Lipnitskiy Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Tested-by: Stijn Segers (cherry picked from commit 2a3b2f59fec10d7c08f90f019b310db418e775bf) --- ...131-wireguard-peer-allocate-in-kmem_cache.patch | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0131-wireguard-peer-allocate-in-kmem_cache.patch (limited to 'target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0131-wireguard-peer-allocate-in-kmem_cache.patch') diff --git a/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0131-wireguard-peer-allocate-in-kmem_cache.patch b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0131-wireguard-peer-allocate-in-kmem_cache.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..32ae327037 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0131-wireguard-peer-allocate-in-kmem_cache.patch @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" +Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:17:34 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: peer: allocate in kmem_cache + +commit a4e9f8e3287c9eb6bf70df982870980dd3341863 upstream. + +With deployments having upwards of 600k peers now, this somewhat heavy +structure could benefit from more fine-grained allocations. +Specifically, instead of using a 2048-byte slab for a 1544-byte object, +we can now use 1544-byte objects directly, thus saving almost 25% +per-peer, or with 600k peers, that's a savings of 303 MiB. This also +makes wireguard's memory usage more transparent in tools like slabtop +and /proc/slabinfo. + +Fixes: 8b5553ace83c ("wireguard: queueing: get rid of per-peer ring buffers") +Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann +Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox +Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org +Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld +Signed-off-by: David S. Miller +Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld +--- + drivers/net/wireguard/main.c | 7 +++++++ + drivers/net/wireguard/peer.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- + drivers/net/wireguard/peer.h | 3 +++ + 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) + +--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/main.c ++++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/main.c +@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ static int __init mod_init(void) + #endif + wg_noise_init(); + ++ ret = wg_peer_init(); ++ if (ret < 0) ++ goto err_peer; ++ + ret = wg_device_init(); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_device; +@@ -44,6 +48,8 @@ static int __init mod_init(void) + err_netlink: + wg_device_uninit(); + err_device: ++ wg_peer_uninit(); ++err_peer: + return ret; + } + +@@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ static void __exit mod_exit(void) + { + wg_genetlink_uninit(); + wg_device_uninit(); ++ wg_peer_uninit(); + } + + module_init(mod_init); +--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/peer.c ++++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/peer.c +@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ + #include + #include + ++static struct kmem_cache *peer_cache; + static atomic64_t peer_counter = ATOMIC64_INIT(0); + + struct wg_peer *wg_peer_create(struct wg_device *wg, +@@ -29,10 +30,10 @@ struct wg_peer *wg_peer_create(struct wg + if (wg->num_peers >= MAX_PEERS_PER_DEVICE) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + +- peer = kzalloc(sizeof(*peer), GFP_KERNEL); ++ peer = kmem_cache_zalloc(peer_cache, GFP_KERNEL); + if (unlikely(!peer)) + return ERR_PTR(ret); +- if (dst_cache_init(&peer->endpoint_cache, GFP_KERNEL)) ++ if (unlikely(dst_cache_init(&peer->endpoint_cache, GFP_KERNEL))) + goto err; + + peer->device = wg; +@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ struct wg_peer *wg_peer_create(struct wg + return peer; + + err: +- kfree(peer); ++ kmem_cache_free(peer_cache, peer); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } + +@@ -193,7 +194,8 @@ static void rcu_release(struct rcu_head + /* The final zeroing takes care of clearing any remaining handshake key + * material and other potentially sensitive information. + */ +- kzfree(peer); ++ memzero_explicit(peer, sizeof(*peer)); ++ kmem_cache_free(peer_cache, peer); + } + + static void kref_release(struct kref *refcount) +@@ -225,3 +227,14 @@ void wg_peer_put(struct wg_peer *peer) + return; + kref_put(&peer->refcount, kref_release); + } ++ ++int __init wg_peer_init(void) ++{ ++ peer_cache = KMEM_CACHE(wg_peer, 0); ++ return peer_cache ? 0 : -ENOMEM; ++} ++ ++void wg_peer_uninit(void) ++{ ++ kmem_cache_destroy(peer_cache); ++} +--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/peer.h ++++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/peer.h +@@ -80,4 +80,7 @@ void wg_peer_put(struct wg_peer *peer); + void wg_peer_remove(struct wg_peer *peer); + void wg_peer_remove_all(struct wg_device *wg); + ++int wg_peer_init(void); ++void wg_peer_uninit(void); ++ + #endif /* _WG_PEER_H */ -- cgit v1.2.3