From ccb7d794ff2ea14369c1759a1e2bcf885e64d456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:22:24 +0000 Subject: kernel: update bcma by backporting 4.4 and 4.5 patches MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki SVN-Revision: 48111 --- ...a-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch | 65 ---------------------- ...a-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch | 65 ---------------------- ...a-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch | 65 ---------------------- 3 files changed, 195 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch delete mode 100644 target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.3/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch delete mode 100644 target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.4/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch (limited to 'target/linux/bcm53xx') diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 9f2cd396ae..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.1/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,65 +0,0 @@ -From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= -Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - -This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall. -Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on -mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to -do the same in bcma. -Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM -proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom. - -Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki ---- -While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and -module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def -tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if -bcma_modinit_early failed. - -Do you see any better idea of solving this? ---- - drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - ---- a/drivers/bcma/main.c -+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c -@@ -637,13 +637,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev - core->id.rev, core->id.class); - } - -+/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */ -+static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void) -+{ -+ return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type); -+} -+#ifndef MODULE -+fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early); -+#endif -+ -+/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */ - static int __init bcma_modinit(void) - { - int err; - -- err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type); -+#ifdef MODULE -+ err = bcma_modinit_early(); - if (err) - return err; -+#endif - - err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver(); - if (err) { -@@ -660,7 +672,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void) - - return err; - } --fs_initcall(bcma_modinit); -+module_init(bcma_modinit); - - static void __exit bcma_modexit(void) - { diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.3/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.3/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 4e5793bc86..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.3/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,65 +0,0 @@ -From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= -Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - -This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall. -Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on -mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to -do the same in bcma. -Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM -proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom. - -Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki ---- -While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and -module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def -tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if -bcma_modinit_early failed. - -Do you see any better idea of solving this? ---- - drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - ---- a/drivers/bcma/main.c -+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c -@@ -673,13 +673,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev - core->id.rev, core->id.class); - } - -+/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */ -+static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void) -+{ -+ return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type); -+} -+#ifndef MODULE -+fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early); -+#endif -+ -+/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */ - static int __init bcma_modinit(void) - { - int err; - -- err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type); -+#ifdef MODULE -+ err = bcma_modinit_early(); - if (err) - return err; -+#endif - - err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver(); - if (err) { -@@ -696,7 +708,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void) - - return err; - } --fs_initcall(bcma_modinit); -+module_init(bcma_modinit); - - static void __exit bcma_modexit(void) - { diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.4/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch b/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.4/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch deleted file mode 100644 index eb9ab2fe8a..0000000000 --- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-4.4/800-bcma-use-two-different-initcalls-if-built-in.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,65 +0,0 @@ -From 666bdfc027cde41a171862dc698987a378c8b66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= -Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:00:42 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH RFC] bcma: use two different initcalls if built-in -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - -This is needed as we can't initialize bus during fs_initcall. -Initialization requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on -mtd. Since mtd, spi, nand, spi-nor use standard module_init, we have to -do the same in bcma. -Without this we'll try to initialize SPROM without having a ready SPROM -proviver registered using bcma_arch_register_fallback_sprom. - -Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki ---- -While this patch seems to work and I can compile bcma as built-in and -module, I'm not too proud of it. I don't really like these #if(n)def -tricks and I'm afraid bcma_modinit may be called even if -bcma_modinit_early failed. - -Do you see any better idea of solving this? ---- - drivers/bcma/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - ---- a/drivers/bcma/main.c -+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c -@@ -668,13 +668,25 @@ static int bcma_device_uevent(struct dev - core->id.rev, core->id.class); - } - -+/* Bus has to be registered early, before any bcma driver */ -+static int __init bcma_modinit_early(void) -+{ -+ return bus_register(&bcma_bus_type); -+} -+#ifndef MODULE -+fs_initcall(bcma_modinit_early); -+#endif -+ -+/* Initialization has to be done later with SPI/mtd/NAND/SPROM available */ - static int __init bcma_modinit(void) - { - int err; - -- err = bus_register(&bcma_bus_type); -+#ifdef MODULE -+ err = bcma_modinit_early(); - if (err) - return err; -+#endif - - err = bcma_host_soc_register_driver(); - if (err) { -@@ -691,7 +703,7 @@ static int __init bcma_modinit(void) - - return err; - } --fs_initcall(bcma_modinit); -+module_init(bcma_modinit); - - static void __exit bcma_modexit(void) - { -- cgit v1.2.3