| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
size-cells should be 0 in order to avoid dummy values in reg properties.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add node aliases to dtsi files.
Reword dts files so they're more in-line with upstream.
Fix some more warnings and errors reported by dtc
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Galabov <sgalabov@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
be done properly for the entire device trees.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Galabov <sgalabov@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to fix probe issues
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 47935
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 47900
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
|
|
|
There is another Zbtlink board (ZBT-WA05) supported in ramips target, so use the same naming scheme for ZBT-WR8305RT board and its dts file.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46614
|
