| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The following patch fixes:
* wrong indentations
* doubled gpio-keys-polled nodes (DIR-300-B7, DIR-320-B1, DIR-610-A1)
* duplicate spacings
* empty lines at end of files and after last child nodes
* trailing and leading whitespace
* unnecessary and commented-out code
* missing empty lines between nodes and between properties and nodes
* unnecessary empty lines between nodes properties [1]
in .dts{,i} files, for ramips target.
[1] Some of empty lines in SOCs dtsi files were left untouched, because they seem to be there for a reason (readability?).
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46613
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 42321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move eeprom extraction from scripts to dts files.
Additionally there are few other changes like:
- whitespace fixes
- add partition labels where needed
- BR6524N board doesn't exist (lost in translation?)
- fix Edimax 3g-6200nl model
- add wmac eeprom to dts for Asus RT-N14U board
Compile tested all subtargets and their profiles.
Run tested on:
- Asus RT-N15
- Asus RT-N14U
- Buffalo WHR-600D
- Argus ATP52B
- Sparklan WCR-150GN
Few problems noted:
- many boards didn't have wmac eeprom information defined at all
- several boards don't have any patitions defined (see FIXME comments in dts)
Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>
SVN-Revision: 41680
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 38026
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 37021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 37016
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-of-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 36290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Those are defined in the SoC specific .dtsi files.
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 36237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix a typo in the node name and add vendor prefix
for the compatible string.
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 36231
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 36216
|
|
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 36168
|