| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This provides better context for board patches.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The only difference between both boards is the DSL annex.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
A couple of SPROM IDs are missing.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
All boards with EHCI enabled should also have OHCI enabled.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
There's no EHCI controller on BCM6348.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current board patches format is crazy.
Let's try to put some order.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows better context for board patches and we no longer need a
downstream patch for that.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are older devices which require overriding the RGMII ports, so this
shouldn't be limited and forced to BCM63268.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
|
|
Let's put some order on board patches.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
