aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9331_tplink_tl-wr710n.dtsi
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* ath79: remove model name from LED labelsAdrian Schmutzler2020-10-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
* ath79: move dts-v1 statement to ath79.dtsiAdrian Schmutzler2020-09-251-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "/dts-v1/;" identifier is supposed to be present once at the top of a device tree file after the includes have been processed. In ath79, we therefore requested to have in the DTS files so far, and omit it in the DTSI files. However, essentially the syntax of the parent ath79.dtsi file already determines the DTS version, so putting it into the DTS files is just a useless repetition. Consequently, this patch puts the dts-v1 statement into the parent ath79.dtsi, which is (indirectly) included by all DTS files. All other occurences are removed. Since the dts-v1 statement needs to be before any other definitions, this also moves the includes to make sure the ath79.dtsi or its descendants are always included first. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
* ath79: add support for TP-Link TL-WR710N v2.1Adrian Schmutzler2020-08-211-0/+88
This adds support for the TP-Link TL-WR710N v2.1. It is basically a re-issue of the v1.2. Specifications: SoC: Atheros AR9331 CPU: 400 MHz Flash: 8 MiB RAM: 32 MiB WiFi: 2.4 GHz b/g/n Ethernet: 2x 100M ports USB: 1x 2.0 The only difference from the v1 is the TP-Link hardware ID/revision. Attention: The TL-WR710N v2.0 (!) has only 4 MB flash and cannot be flashed with this image. It has a different TPLINK_HWREV, so accidental flashing of the factory image should be impossible without additional measures. Unfortunately, the v2.0 in ar71xx has the same board name, so sysupgrade from ar71xx v2.0 into ath79 v1/v2.1 will not be prevented, but will brick the device. Flashing instruction: Upload the factory image via the OEM firmware GUI upgrade mechanism. Further notes: To make implementation easier if somebody desires to port the 4M v2.0, this already creates two DTSI files. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de> Tested-by: Fabian Eppig <fabian@eppig.de>