| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Jeff Kletsky noted in his patch titled:
"utils/spidev_test: Update to current source from upstream Linux"
that the spidev_test utility OpenWrt ships is severly out of date.
Instead of updating the spidev_test.c from the current kernel,
this patch replaces the package building code to utilize the
very file that gets shipped with the kernel we compiling for
anyway much like the "perf" package already does.
Reported-by: Jeff Kletsky <git-commits@allycomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- document indirect source code fixup affecting spidev_test
v2: check against old Kernel versions
Signed-off-by: Dirk Neukirchen <dirkneukirchen@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info.
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 43167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
|
|
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 37007
|